|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
Post: RE: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
| That's just the way it works. GPUs work on massively parallel problems, therefore you have to give them lots of work to do in order to gain acceleration. Once you start to run out of work, you start t... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,748 |
12-06-2014, 02:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
Post: RE: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
| how are you measuring this? or is this from memory only. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,748 |
12-06-2014, 04:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
Post: RE: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,748 |
12-07-2014, 03:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vclHashcat-plus64 [s]tatus
Post: RE: vclHashcat-plus64 [s]tatus
| status doesn't work, you just have to live with it.
no, those speeds are not normal for a 7970. a single 7970 should be able to pull about 130 kh/s. but, those speeds are probably to be expected with... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,076 |
05-06-2013, 03:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vclHashcat-plus64 [s]tatus
Post: RE: vclHashcat-plus64 [s]tatus
| broker specs are solid, although more ram may be needed if you ever decide to use all 32 GPUs. you won't be able to use very high -n values with that "little" ram.
you're on ethernet, so you're guara... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,076 |
05-06-2013, 05:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
Post: RE: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
| The official 7990 comes out in two weeks. If you're considering something like this it would probably just be best to pick up 4x7990. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
22,939 |
04-29-2013, 05:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
Post: RE: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
| It might work in a 2U chassis like the Supermicro SYS-2027GR-TRFH but I don't know for sure. The Tyan B7015F77V4R is 4U, not 3U, and it will definitely work in there, although you will only be able to... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
22,939 |
04-30-2013, 07:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
Post: RE: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
| unless you're feeling adventurous and have money to burn, i would forget the splitter solution |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
22,939 |
05-15-2013, 01:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
Post: RE: VCL-Cluster vs PCI Express Splitter solution
| B7015F77V4R is my favorite for everything |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
22,939 |
05-11-2013, 01:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: VCL, a few questions
Post: RE: VCL, a few questions
| Kuci pretty much said it all.
It's difficult to calculate what percentage of speed loss you will see because it depends on a number of factors (number of nodes, number of GPUs, network topology, at... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
8 |
13,012 |
05-17-2013, 08:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: VCL, a few questions
Post: RE: VCL, a few questions
| third-party wrappers like disthc are currently the only way to distribute hashcat over the internet |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
8 |
13,012 |
05-18-2013, 05:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| VCL does not use Catalyst. Use --force with vclHashcat to ignore the message about the driver. Your compute nodes absolutely must be using 12.8. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
12-19-2012, 03:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| It's hard telling what you've done wrong. You ignored the wiki when you installed catalyst 12.10 at first, so who knows where else you deviated from the wiki. You also have oclHashcat installed on a c... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
12-22-2012, 06:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| My point is that there's no way for us to know what you have done in order to help troubleshoot your environment. But you did in fact deviate from the wiki when you used VCL 1.16. Nobody has gotten 1.... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
12-23-2012, 06:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| 1. this is normal
2. this is also normal |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
01-08-2013, 12:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| yeah, the vclHashcat binary is still needed. it does not work with the oclHashcat binary. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
01-09-2013, 08:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| right. but we found out that vcl 1.17 doesn't actually fix all the issues, and that the vclHashcat binaries are still required. that is why they're still mentioned in the updated wiki article. atom sa... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
01-09-2013, 08:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| it's not a huge pain to configure the broker on a compute node, no. just follow all of the instructions in the wiki for the broker configuration on one of your compute nodes. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
01-09-2013, 05:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| It means your broker ran out of memory. The only person I know who has had this problem ended up having a misconfigured network, where he tried to multi-home each node but he put the second NICs on a ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
01-10-2013, 02:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
| yeah, rurapenthe thought it was a memory leak, too. bitched about how the oclHashcat process was leaking like a sieve. turns out, it was his misconfigured network the whole time.
so if you're seeing ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
01-11-2013, 10:31 AM |
