|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 1Password - need help using hashcat
Post: RE: 1Password - need help using hashcat
| That's not at all how that works.
First, it would be $HEX[c2] and $HEX[a7], not what you have above.
Moreover, $HEX[] encoding only works for wordlists, not masks.
Maybe what you meant was --... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
21 |
19,496 |
05-02-2017, 02:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 16 characters password
Post: RE: 16 characters password
| Brute force would take much longer than "several weeks." You're talking about a keyspace of 62^15 and that is just not possible to brute force.
Best approach would be wordlist-based attacks, using ... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
1 |
3,887 |
06-15-2015, 07:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 15k budget - how would you spend it?
Post: RE: 15k budget - how would you spend it?
| search through the hardware forum, we cover this a lot :) but the ft77 is definitely a great place to start, either with 8x 7970 or 4x 7990. and i'd absolutely avoid water cooling. also, i just sent y... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
4 |
9,557 |
11-22-2013, 12:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 15k budget - how would you spend it?
Post: RE: 15k budget - how would you spend it?
| there's a complicated reason for why i haven't done that, but the simple answer is, i have a financial motivation not to do so, and it would be inappropriate for me to advertise on these forums. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
4 |
9,557 |
11-22-2013, 03:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
| it would be less of an issue if combinator in hashcat behaved like combinator.bin or combinator in oclHashcat-plus. but, it would be even nicer if the a0 and a1 kernels just supported longer lengths.
... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,741 |
01-06-2013, 12:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
| there's always a tradeoff, and a small loss of speed is an acceptable tradeoff to make something more flexible and more powerful. speed isn't everything. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,741 |
01-06-2013, 01:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (01-09-2013, 01:33 AM)
--
However as the passwords on that list are only the ones that were found, I wonder how many of the "not found" hashes were > 15 characters in length?
--
prec... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,741 |
01-09-2013, 02:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
|
atom Wrote: (01-09-2013, 10:07 AM)
--
The full rockyou analysis:
--
but keep in mind rockyou's demographics: primarily kids, teenagers, and hopeless housewives who pass their time playing myspace a... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,741 |
01-09-2013, 05:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 13 gpu issue
Post: RE: 13 gpu issue
| '$' denotes a variable name in the bash shell. If you provide the bare hash string without escaping it, bash thinks '$ethereum' is the name of a variable, whose value is null.
The '$' character abs... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
9,747 |
01-18-2018, 07:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1204_HWE_EOL
Post: RE: 1204_HWE_EOL
| i haven't tested the saucy or trusty backports, but the raring backports work well.
Code:
--
aptitude -R install linux-generic-lts-raring xserver-xorg-lts-raring xserver-xorg-core-lts-raring xse... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
2 |
6,975 |
07-15-2014, 09:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080gtx running slow with WPA
Post: RE: 1080gtx running slow with WPA
| At stock clocks you should be around 415 KH/s, with an overclock you should be around 530 KH/s. So yes, 290 KH/s is pretty low -- that's actually right in line with how a GTX 1070 performs. Assuming y... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,869 |
08-13-2017, 07:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080gtx running slow with WPA
Post: RE: 1080gtx running slow with WPA
| Are you sure there's only one handshake in your capture? Because it sounds like there may be two different SSIDs. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,869 |
08-14-2017, 05:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080gtx running slow with WPA
Post: RE: 1080gtx running slow with WPA
| Two Hashcat processes running simultaneously? One you forgot about running under screen? :P I don't know, I'm kind of at a loss on this one. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,869 |
08-15-2017, 04:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI FE not buyable, 1070 TI FE on the rise
Post: RE: 1080 TI FE not buyable, 1070 TI FE on the rise
| You're doing something terribly, terribly wrong if you're having trouble cooling FE GPUs. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
18 |
13,646 |
12-08-2017, 03:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Everyone please note: when Flomac says "So new is always better in energy terms. And the performance of a GPU generation scales very good under hashcat. 30% more performance result in 30% more energy ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-11-2017, 04:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| R9 Fury X was never the best.
GTX 1080 Ti and GTX Titan XP should have clock-for-clock identical performance. But it won't have the best bang for the buck. If we look at MD5 perf per dollar:
GTX... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-01-2017, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Well... Yes and no ;)
You're correct: you should take the total build cost into consideration. There's a reason we do not offer the GTX 1070 in the Brutalis in a clustered configuration, it throws t... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-02-2017, 03:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Yeah I didn't realize until later that the price points Nvidia advertised were for OEM cards, not FE. We used FE prices when calculating the new Brutalis price points.
However, if you're simply looki... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-02-2017, 08:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
|
NikosD Wrote: (03-11-2017, 09:00 AM)
--
VEGA is already faster than 1080 in OpenCL benchmarks. Take a look at the bitcoin mining.
--
I'm not inclined to believe that, as I just had a long discussio... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-11-2017, 08:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| My heart is pretty big, but you're way more optimistic about AMD than I am ;) |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-11-2017, 11:55 PM |
