|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| My pessimism is grounded in realism though ;) Keep in mind that Bitweasil and I predicted AMD's sharp downturn back in 2012. Even though the 7970 had just been released and was by all rights a fantast... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-12-2017, 08:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| The numbers in your benchmark are actually a bit low. At 925 Mhz, single hash NTLM performance should be about 15700 MH/s per GPU, or 125.6 GH/s total. But actually stock clock for your 7990 should be... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,137 |
10-20-2013, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| this is more like what you should be seeing for single ntlm brute force:
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat-lite
Status.........: Running
Hash.Target..... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,137 |
10-21-2013, 03:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i'm just going to leave this right here...
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat
Status.........: Running
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,137 |
12-29-2013, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| 8x R9 290X @ 1200 Mhz, Catalyst 13.12, oclHashcat 1.00 |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,137 |
12-30-2013, 01:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i have yet to get these cards over 72C! but that said, i do get asic hangs at 1200 Mhz at stock voltage. need to adjust the voltage a tick to make them stable. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,137 |
12-30-2013, 03:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| yeah in the benchmarks i did, i tested at a memory clock of 1375 since that is the 7970's default memory clock. not sure if you've seen those or not yet, but i posted a link on twitter. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,137 |
12-30-2013, 05:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1/4 cpu cores being used
Post: RE: 1/4 cpu cores being used
| i think that's his point, is that it is using 25% cpu when he feels he shouldn't be.
however, in this example he is cracking 13.8 million hashes. and while he didn't paste his command line, he's prob... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,853 |
04-30-2013, 02:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1 gtx1080 ti vs 2 gtx 1070
Post: RE: 1 gtx1080 ti vs 2 gtx 1070
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
2 |
3,892 |
03-20-2017, 07:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0/1 hashes recovered errorr
Post: RE: 0/1 hashes recovered errorr
| Since you're using The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali), let me put this in terms you will understand: "Try Harder." |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,142 |
02-23-2017, 03:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| you're chaining too many rules together. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-22-2013, 07:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0% runs too fast no results
Post: RE: 0% runs too fast no results
| 100 threads? You have 100 CPU cores? |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
4,503 |
12-29-2014, 10:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0% Progress
Post: RE: 0% Progress
| try reading the wiki and the output of -h instead of tutorials. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
8,319 |
05-14-2014, 01:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .ZIP files? (again)
Post: RE: .ZIP files? (again)
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
2 |
5,948 |
09-08-2015, 02:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: .zip archive add support
Post: RE: .zip archive add support
| 1. Feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums.
2. There's already a ticket open for this request, https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/161, and it has been accepted. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,035 |
11-28-2015, 08:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .onion domain brute
Post: RE: .onion domain brute
| First, feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums. Second, generating vanity names and addresses is certainly outside the scope of Hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,256 |
11-28-2015, 08:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .cap hash extraction
Post: RE: .cap hash extraction
| you are specifying a salted hash mode without supplying the hash and salt in "hash:salt" format. it looks like you are just concatenating the salt with the hash. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
39,553 |
08-25-2014, 12:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: -t option statsprocessor
Post: RE: -t option statsprocessor
| https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1274-post-7000.html#pid7000 |
|
epixoip |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
8 |
14,425 |
09-01-2013, 12:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -t option statsprocessor
Post: RE: -t option statsprocessor
| ah sorry, that's in the beta tester forum.
basically the threshold parameter defines the maximum number of characters to be added to the Markov table. it's used for keyspace reduction, e.g. for an ... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
8 |
14,425 |
09-01-2013, 12:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -t option statsprocessor
Post: RE: -t option statsprocessor
| well, it wouldn't be random letter combinations. they would be probabilistically-ordered. but yes, it would only try the 26^8-th most probable combinations, without trying the more unlikely ones. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
8 |
14,425 |
09-01-2013, 12:59 PM |
