Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: [HELP REQUEST]; Brute force MySQL5
Post: RE: [HELP REQUEST]; Brute force MySQL5
cool story. now take a week off to read the forum rules. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,943 |
01-10-2013, 04:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: [HD 5870] Benchmark
Post: RE: [HD 5870] Benchmark
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,999 |
12-31-2013, 08:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Excel 2003] Read-only password : need second hash ?
Post: RE: [Excel 2003] Read-only password : need second ...
The modify password doesn't need to be cracked, it can simply be removed. Save an unencrypted copy of the file, then use any of the tools available on the Internet to remove the modify password. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
2 |
4,427 |
09-16-2015, 03:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Copying] for a long time
Post: RE: [Copying] for a long time
https://hashcat.net/faq#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,424 |
05-08-2018, 02:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
This is a visual bug only, it still finds the correct password. What you are seeing is not a "corrupt" hash, but rather the byte-swapped hash (SHA1 is big endian, x86 is little endian.) This is actual... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,754 |
02-05-2013, 08:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
Here's some code to illustrate what is happening inside Hashcat:
Code:
--
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
uint32_t hash[5];
uint32_t bswap_hash[5];
s... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,754 |
02-05-2013, 08:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Beta] cudaHashcat-1.20 - GTX 750 TI Benchmark
Post: RE: [Beta] cudaHashcat-1.20 - GTX 750 TI Benchmark
actually i don't think there's any technical reason it shouldn't work as long as your motherboard supports PCIe MR-IOV. from a technical standpoint, i don't think this would be much different from usi... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
28,994 |
03-27-2014, 07:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
using -n 160 -u 1024 will yield better performance than the defaults, yes.
if the password is in the dictionary you're using, then of course dictionary would be faster than brute force. checking more... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 11:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
first, you should be comparing your speed to "PC1", not "PC3."
second, you are benchmarking with 202 hashes, instead of one hash. this will slow down your speed by a factor of 202. 388k * 202 = 78376... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 11:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
no, it will not damage your hardware.
no, the operating system does not affect speed. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 02:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
ghz edition? overlclocking? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 03:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
your speed is 8750 M/s, the reference benchmark is 7500 M/s.. that 7500 M/s is using the stock clock of 925 Mhz. so if you have a ghz edition card, or are overclocking, then that explains why your car... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-26-2013, 01:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: [.Net 4.5] Leukocyte_GUI_for_oclHashcat (GUI wrapper)
Post: RE: [.Net 4.5] Leukocyte_GUI_for_oclHashcat (GUI w...
Wow, that interface is really clean. Haven't looked at the code, but the interface looks fantastic. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
19 |
35,838 |
02-27-2015, 02:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: zip compressed wordlist
Post: RE: zip compressed wordlist
people still use zip compression? |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
13,783 |
11-07-2012, 09:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
it really does not matter that it is reporting the memory size incorrectly. it's a cosmetic "defect" only and does not impact anything. and no, it's not hashcat's fault.
but you DO need cat 13.1. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-02-2013, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
it's stopping because you don't have catalyst 13.1 installed, not because it thinks you have 512MB of ram.
you may think you have it installed, but you don't. you're still using the old version. you ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-02-2013, 11:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
Hm, perplexing. Everything looks okay, but something must not be right. Atom does several checks to ensure that all of the libraries being loaded belong to the correct driver version. Something is fai... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-03-2013, 12:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
The way I upgraded my servers from 12.8 to 13.1 was:
Code:
--
stop lightdm
sh amd-driver-installer-8.982-x86.x86_64.run --uninstall=force
rm -f /etc/X11/xorg.conf*
reboot -f
sh amd-driver-installer... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-03-2013, 01:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
you're the only person to report such an issue, and all of your symptoms point toward bad driver install. something just isn't right with your setup. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-04-2013, 06:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
Wolf_Blitzer Wrote: (02-04-2013, 07:16 PM)
--
Please, show me where it's wrong.
We've covered that my driver is installed correctly. I even used your method removing it and installing it again, bu... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-04-2013, 08:55 PM |