Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post [asc] Author Forum Replies Views Posted
    Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds

yes, i was there briefly to socialize
epixoip General Talk 29 55,584 12-05-2012, 05:28 AM
    Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds

no, supercl just shifts where you need the high bandwidth/low latency link from between your broker and compute nodes, to between your compute nodes and your storage. why do you want to eliminate inf...
epixoip General Talk 29 55,584 12-15-2012, 02:29 AM
    Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds

nicely done! welcome to the club :D
epixoip General Talk 29 55,584 01-10-2013, 08:46 PM
    Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds

sort of. supercl reduces the amount of kernel executions that occur over the network. instead of making one call for each kernel execution, it allows you to make just one call for *all* your kernel...
epixoip General Talk 29 55,584 01-11-2013, 03:12 AM
    Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds

Man, I have no idea what you guys are on about. The entire 5000-series in general is very power efficient and quite easy to cool, and the 5970s draw less watts than a 7970. I run all four of my 5970s ...
epixoip General Talk 29 55,584 01-11-2013, 06:00 PM
    Thread: sha512crypt issue
Post: RE: sha512crypt issue

Phenom x4 is your CPU. mastercracker asked about your GPU.
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 9 13,806 03-03-2014, 03:39 AM
    Thread: sha512crypt hash error
Post: RE: sha512crypt hash error

press "s".
epixoip Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 10 24,508 10-01-2012, 09:37 PM
    Thread: sha512($salt.md5($password))
Post: RE: sha512($salt.md5($password))

Wow, that's much improved over the old dynamic formats. Which only serves to remind me that I really need to find some spare time to work on my dynamic cracker.
epixoip General Help 3 5,966 07-19-2015, 10:57 AM
    Thread: SHA512 without salt
Post: RE: SHA512 without salt

Ok I did some digging into this one and was able to figure out what you've got. My initial assumption was that the salt was null and that what you had was equivalent to "$6$rounds=5000$$", which assu...
epixoip hashcat 4 5,167 06-29-2017, 11:00 PM
    Thread: SHA512 without salt
Post: RE: SHA512 without salt

Yeah, I'm going to open an issue for a few cases I ran into. Some quick examples: When I input `$6$$rounds=5$gTCqLuWl...` hashcat turns it into `$6$$rounds65qgTCqLuWl...` When I input `$6$rounds=500...
epixoip hashcat 4 5,167 06-30-2017, 05:26 PM
    Thread: sha512 Unix
Post: RE: sha512 Unix

sha512crypt (-m 1800) support was added in -plus v0.09 and -lite v0.10
epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 9 20,265 10-14-2012, 03:30 AM
    Thread: sha512 Unix
Post: RE: sha512 Unix

DiG Wrote: (10-15-2012, 12:43 AM) -- Not the UNIX variant if I understand correctly, hence MuMMeL's question. Hashcat-plus does implement sha512crypt but is too slow on my GPU (500c/s). I've been try...
epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 9 20,265 10-16-2012, 01:05 AM
    Thread: sha512 line length exception
Post: RE: sha512 line length exception

$6$ hashes in /etc/shadow are not sha512($salt.$pass). try harder.
epixoip General Help 2 7,056 03-28-2013, 05:23 AM
    Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?

oclHaschat only implements a single block of sha256, therefore total input (salt + plain) cannot exceed the size of one block.
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 9 16,286 02-13-2014, 08:35 PM
    Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?

for sha256, 55 bytes.
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 9 16,286 02-13-2014, 08:57 PM
    Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?

yes. and it does crack the password. except there does seem to be a bug as it does mangle up the plaintext. Code: -- epixoip@token:~/oclHashcat-1.02$ ./oclHashcat64.bin -d 1 -n 1 -m 1410 ~/example_...
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 9 16,286 02-13-2014, 09:16 PM
    Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?

Ah ok, yeah, that's more clear. So yes, you should file a bug report about this on Trac. Might also want to include the bug in my example as well, where it cracked "1234567" as "4321[76" (not just a d...
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 9 16,286 02-13-2014, 09:59 PM
    Thread: SHA256
Post: RE: SHA256

no, you do it.
epixoip Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 8 20,821 11-25-2013, 10:54 AM
    Thread: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Post: RE: SHA1 underscore salted ?

just add an underscore to the end of each salt and use the 'u' rule. Edit: aww, Rolf beat me to it.
epixoip General Help 9 15,119 02-26-2013, 08:07 PM
    Thread: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Post: RE: SHA1 underscore salted ?

i do not know if the string parser will be confused by the second : or not, too lazy to test, but if it is, you could always just use a hexsalt.
epixoip General Help 9 15,119 02-27-2013, 01:15 PM