Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Segmentation fault (core dump) on --show and --left
Post: RE: Segmentation fault (core dump) on --show and -...
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
24,118 |
10-17-2012, 12:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: Segfault on --show
Post: RE: Segfault on --show
Does it happen with 1.37 as well? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,188 |
11-08-2015, 12:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Seeking Sensei
Post: RE: Seeking Sensei
So, if you really want to learn from me, I am doing a free* training class at CircleCityCon this weekend on June 10. There are still four open seats. https://circlecitycon.com/news/glossary/password-c... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,368 |
06-06-2017, 08:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Second GPU Missing after first cudaHashcat run
Post: RE: Second GPU Missing after first cudaHashcat run
If you're using risers, then bad riser. If you're not using risers, then bad PCI-e slot. If it's not the motherboard, then bad GPU. Basic Layer 1 troubleshooting. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,067 |
06-25-2015, 09:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Second GPU Missing after first cudaHashcat run
Post: RE: Second GPU Missing after first cudaHashcat run
That actually doesn't rule out anything that I said. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,067 |
06-28-2015, 01:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Searching very big word list
Post: RE: Searching very big word list
you don't want or need very big wordlists. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
4 |
8,654 |
05-23-2013, 04:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: Scrape Twitter hashtags
Post: RE: Scrape Twitter hashtags
This is a pretty cool idea, good work |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
1 |
4,672 |
03-20-2016, 12:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Scoping out new 4xGPU or 6xGPU 1080 FE build
Post: RE: Scoping out new 4xGPU or 6xGPU 1080 FE build
I'd stay away from risers unless you have a lot of previous experience with them. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
14,372 |
12-13-2016, 04:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: save calculated hashes or check against partial hash
Post: RE: save calculated hashes or check against partia...
Two part question, two part answer.
r00t Wrote: (07-19-2015, 11:41 PM)
--
Is there any way to save hashes calculated with oclhashcat?
--
No.
r00t Wrote: (07-19-2015, 11:41 PM)
--
I have t... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,264 |
07-20-2015, 12:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: save calculated hashes or check against partial hash
Post: RE: save calculated hashes or check against partia...
Maybe. Hashcat won't help you with this, but you could just write a quick cracker and find out. You don't need to save the output of anything, just write a cracker that tests if substr(md5(md5(str)), ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,264 |
07-20-2015, 01:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire r9 290x 4gb
Post: RE: Sapphire r9 290x 4gb
The reported memory is fine. Not all of the memory is available for compute tasks. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,584 |
06-08-2015, 08:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire r9 290x 4gb
Post: RE: Sapphire r9 290x 4gb
Are you manually setting your fan to 90-100%? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,584 |
06-08-2015, 08:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire r9 290x 4gb
Post: RE: Sapphire r9 290x 4gb
It's a really bad idea to let the BIOS manage the fan speed automatically, because it's programmed for gaming workloads, not compute workloads. You really must set the fan speed manually. Yes, it's ok... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,584 |
06-08-2015, 10:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Post: RE: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
doesn't make sense, something is not right. it might be because you aren't specifying a mask and thus aren't gaining full acceleration for smaller keyspaces. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,898 |
10-28-2014, 09:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Post: RE: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
What's the output of ./oclHashcat64.bin -m 7100 -b on each GPU?
Also why are you using sudo? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,898 |
10-28-2014, 12:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Post: RE: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Hm, doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
The R9 270 is showing up as Pitcairn, but Pitcairn is HD 7850 -- there aren't any Pitcairn-based R9 GPUs, and your core clock doesn't match the stock clock o... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,898 |
10-28-2014, 01:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Post: RE: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
what does the output of ''clinfo | grep Name'' show on the R9 270? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,898 |
10-28-2014, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Post: RE: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Actually Pitcairn is GCN, I was thinking it was VLIW5, but that's just 7350 - 7670. So Hashcat should be loading a VLIW1 kernel regardless. But it may still be doing something else that is suboptimal ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,898 |
10-28-2014, 02:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
Post: RE: Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X slower than HD5850
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,898 |
10-28-2014, 04:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sapphire HD7970 Reference Design
Post: RE: Sapphire HD7970 Reference Design
the first gpu is the reference design card, which is what you want. i would not consider the "newer" model as it suggests.
cpu only matters if you plan to use cpu hashcat as well. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
2 |
6,381 |
06-20-2013, 10:51 AM |