|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: GTX Titan X
Post: RE: GTX Titan X
| Hmm, the last rumors I heard said 3072 shaders for the 980Ti, but it's possible that they were seeing the Titan X and thinking it was the 980Ti. Guess we'll have to wait and see.
I strongly disagre... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
26,515 |
03-15-2015, 07:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX Titan X
Post: RE: GTX Titan X
| 295X2 doesn't just throttle for heat, it also throttles for power consumption. 4096 cores on GCN with the die shrink will likely want to draw somewhere between 375W - 425W at full load, but the card i... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
26,515 |
03-16-2015, 05:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX Titan X
Post: RE: GTX Titan X
| Oh, you KNOW that we'll immediately buy eight when they come out to test in the Brutalis :) |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
26,515 |
03-16-2015, 11:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX Titan X
Post: RE: GTX Titan X
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
26,515 |
03-18-2015, 08:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX Titan
Post: RE: GTX Titan
| if by "green team" you mean nvidia, and "red team" you mean amd, then no, the green team most definitely doesn't have more compute power than the red team. the titan is only a 3.5 TFLOPS card, compare... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
10,837 |
02-23-2013, 02:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 980M Slow speed
Post: RE: GTX 980M Slow speed
| GTX 980M is not the same as a GTX 980. Mobile GPUs are slower due to power and heat constraints.
The amount of video memory is inconsequential for cracking performance, unless you're cracking scryp... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
3 |
5,925 |
08-27-2015, 12:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 970 VRAM allocation bug
Post: RE: GTX 970 VRAM allocation bug
| It doesn't sound bad at all, and it's certainly not a matter of Nvidia not testing their hardware. It's a matter of using a lower-performing memory controller on a non-flagship GPU, which is entirely ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
2 |
5,574 |
01-26-2015, 06:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 970 Benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX 970 Benchmarks
| You just answered your own question: no Xorg, so no PowerMizer tuning. Cards are throttling to save power. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
17 |
35,950 |
02-23-2015, 10:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 970 Benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX 970 Benchmarks
| No :( You need xorg to enable CoolBits and set the Performance Level. You also need xorg to disable the kernel timeout.
For a headless system you can just use this:
Code:
--
nvidia-xconfig -... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
17 |
35,950 |
02-24-2015, 12:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 970 Benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX 970 Benchmarks
| check your clocks. maybe one card is factory overclock and the other one isn't.
100 Mhz overclock is quite mild, so you likely won't have any issues running that 24/7. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
17 |
35,950 |
02-24-2015, 08:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 970 Benchmark
Post: RE: GTX 970 Benchmark
| Yes, as philsmd said, you forgot the most important part ;) You have to add rules to get acceleration. Otherwise you are better off using CPU. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
29,519 |
01-16-2015, 09:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 970 Benchmark
Post: RE: GTX 970 Benchmark
| best64.rule is not enough rules to gain full acceleration. try using d3ad0ne.rule or rockyou-30000.rule |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
29,519 |
01-16-2015, 08:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 960m Benchmark
Post: RE: GTX 960m Benchmark
| GTX 960M should be 2.6x slower than untuned GTX 970 / 3.4x slower than tuned GTX 970. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,750 |
05-05-2016, 07:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 960m Benchmark
Post: RE: GTX 960m Benchmark
| Would be ~40% slower than the 960M. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,750 |
05-05-2016, 10:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 950 bench?
Post: RE: GTX 950 bench?
| 950 will be 2.67x slower than a GTX 980, but actually a bit slower than that even since it won't overclock as well. So I'd just divide 980 benchmarks by 3 and that should roughly give you the speed yo... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
1 |
4,199 |
11-06-2015, 01:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: gtx 780 ti x 3
Post: RE: gtx 780 ti x 3
| hash cracking performance will suck, so if you're building this exclusively for password cracking, you're going about it all wrong. especially for that price tag. perf per dollar would be horrendous o... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,210 |
01-13-2014, 11:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 670 extreme lag when bruteforcing wpa
Post: RE: GTX 670 extreme lag when bruteforcing wpa
| adjust your -n and -u values |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,261 |
04-07-2013, 06:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 470 or Radeon 5970?
Post: RE: GTX 470 or Radeon 5970?
|
themask Wrote: (02-03-2013, 05:15 PM)
--
Radeon HD is faster
--
A LOT faster. Like 6x faster. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,975 |
02-03-2013, 09:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 1080: errors
Post: RE: GTX 1080: errors
|
DoNoHarm Wrote: (02-16-2017, 02:30 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (02-16-2017, 01:18 PM)
--
The "Device #1: Graphics Device" is kind of strange. Maybe your GPU does not support this driver. Try again with lates... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
12 |
13,777 |
02-16-2017, 08:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 1080 Nvidia driver performance
Post: RE: GTX 1080 Nvidia driver performance
| There really isn't any significant impact to performance for any of the drivers that support the GTX 1080. There are, however, drivers that break things like overclocking, which does impact performanc... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,421 |
02-18-2017, 10:27 AM |
