|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| But what version of Windows, smartass? :) |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-17-2013, 02:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
|
M@LIK Wrote: (02-17-2013, 07:42 PM)
--
epixoip Wrote:
--
But what version of Windows, smartass? :)
--
alexusswe Wrote:
--
Im using Windows 7 64Bit
--
Now what, smartass?
--
Oh I don't know, I don... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-18-2013, 07:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| there's nothing in your screenshot to indicate that the cpu version is not working on your box. looks to me like you didn't really give it much work to do so it finished almost immediately. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-23-2013, 09:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| i see output in your screenshot. if you're looking for the status, you won't see it unless you press 'enter' in that window, just like it tells you. if you gave it a larger workload you would probably... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-23-2013, 07:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| it only writes to the output file if it actually cracks something. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-24-2013, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| The numbers in your benchmark are actually a bit low. At 925 Mhz, single hash NTLM performance should be about 15700 MH/s per GPU, or 125.6 GH/s total. But actually stock clock for your 7990 should be... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
10-20-2013, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| this is more like what you should be seeing for single ntlm brute force:
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat-lite
Status.........: Running
Hash.Target..... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
10-21-2013, 03:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i'm just going to leave this right here...
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat
Status.........: Running
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-29-2013, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| 8x R9 290X @ 1200 Mhz, Catalyst 13.12, oclHashcat 1.00 |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-30-2013, 01:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i have yet to get these cards over 72C! but that said, i do get asic hangs at 1200 Mhz at stock voltage. need to adjust the voltage a tick to make them stable. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-30-2013, 03:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| yeah in the benchmarks i did, i tested at a memory clock of 1375 since that is the 7970's default memory clock. not sure if you've seen those or not yet, but i posted a link on twitter. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-30-2013, 05:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
| ... is this a real question? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
44,389 |
02-08-2013, 11:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
| there are lots of factors that influence speed. freaking out over a 20K variance is unwarranted. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
44,389 |
02-08-2013, 11:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
| there is nothing wrong with your card. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
44,389 |
02-09-2013, 12:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
| you should use --gpu-loops 4096 with WPA. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
44,389 |
02-09-2013, 01:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
| exus_28 doesn't have a problem. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
44,389 |
02-11-2013, 01:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
| your command is correct. brute forcing wpa is braindead. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
44,389 |
02-12-2013, 06:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How do I crack substr hash?
Post: RE: How do I crack substr hash?
| hashcat does not support anything like that.
however, there are only 2**32 possible combinations, so there's a 50% chance you'll find a collision after 77k attempts, and a 75% chance after 110k attem... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
44,519 |
01-22-2013, 12:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How do I crack substr hash?
Post: RE: How do I crack substr hash?
| no, i mean write your own program or script that will generate a collision. it doesn't have to be very fast or efficient because you are likely to find a collision in only 110,000 guesses when compari... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
44,519 |
01-25-2013, 05:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How do I crack substr hash?
Post: RE: How do I crack substr hash?
| here's my stab at creating a program to crack this type of hash. not exceptionally good since it doesn't use sse2 or anything, but it is multithreaded and should be quite a bit faster than the other t... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
44,519 |
01-29-2013, 11:00 PM |
