|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: combination of attack mode?
Post: RE: combination of attack mode?
| That would be the most appropriate approach |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
5 |
6,436 |
12-19-2016, 09:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: combination of attack mode?
Post: RE: combination of attack mode?
| You won't get an estimated end time because you're streaming candidates to hashcat and therefore it has no way of knowing how many candidates you are going to send it. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
5 |
6,436 |
12-20-2016, 06:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: performance diffrence PCIe
Post: RE: performance diffrence PCIe
| There's no difference between PCI-e 2.0 and PCI-e 3.0.
Going from x16 -> x1 you will experience longer loading times, but the cracking speed itself is essentially the same (there are some caveats t... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
6,437 |
01-09-2015, 06:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Question on hardware lifespan
Post: RE: Question on hardware lifespan
| If you choose the right GPU and follow all the advice we've provided here in the Hardware forum over the years, your card should last a good long while. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
4 |
6,453 |
04-13-2016, 04:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hash Cracking Project
Post: RE: Hash Cracking Project
| This is not the appropriate place to discuss this matter. |
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
1 |
6,482 |
05-01-2015, 04:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Integer overflow detected in keyspace of mask
Post: RE: Integer overflow detected in keyspace of mask
| Keyspace is stored as an unsigned 64-bit integer. 16^64 is much, much larger than 2^64 - 1.
You might want to do the math on how long it would take to crack 16^64. |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
7 |
6,482 |
04-28-2019, 10:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
| you must have missed the releases? |
|
epixoip |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-01-2013, 12:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
| no, he didn't. he posted it 30m after the hashcat release, and about 5 hours after the plus/lite release. |
|
epixoip |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-01-2013, 03:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
| yes, and me and K9's point is that the beta versions are obsolete, so it does not matter. |
|
epixoip |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-01-2013, 04:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Identifying Hash type
Post: RE: Identifying Hash type
| If you don't have a known ciphertext:plaintext pair then there's really no way we can help you.
But what you're likely seeing is just a nonce / anti-csrf token which is typically generated with som... |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
3 |
6,488 |
07-13-2015, 09:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
Post: RE: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
| Your -n/-u values do not make any sense. Just use -w 3 instead. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,490 |
11-24-2015, 01:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need help with cudaHashcat and The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali)
Post: RE: Need help with cudaHashcat and The-Distributio...
| The legacy driver will not work, and cudaHashcat will not work with your GPU, it is simply too old. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,491 |
01-30-2016, 11:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need help with cudaHashcat and The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali)
Post: RE: Need help with cudaHashcat and The-Distributio...
| 100% positive. cudaHashcat requires CUDA 7, and CUDA 7 does not not support your GPU. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,491 |
01-31-2016, 08:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hd7970 supported?
Post: RE: hd7970 supported?
| the error you have pasted is not an error. maybe you can paste the real error. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,504 |
11-01-2013, 11:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hd7970 supported?
Post: RE: hd7970 supported?
| you do not have a 7970, you have a 7790. this gpu is supported in plus 0.15. if you're using 0.15, you likely didn't extract the archive with full paths. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,504 |
11-01-2013, 04:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 2.01 vs 3.1
Post: RE: hashcat 2.01 vs 3.1
| In your first test you only have one device, in your second test you have at least 3 devices (though you've skipped #2). Is this really an apples-to-apples comparison you're doing? Also, have you trie... |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
5 |
6,504 |
11-08-2016, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hash type?
Post: RE: Hash type?
| It's just simple "XOR encryption." The key is 594b455940315a3846244d. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
6,508 |
07-03-2015, 06:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hash type?
Post: RE: Hash type?
| This thread is getting all script-kiddie way too fast. We gave you way more help than we probably should have. We told you what type of "encryption" is used, and even gave you the key. You should be a... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
6,508 |
07-03-2015, 07:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: feature DVB common scrambling algorithm
Post: RE: feature DVB common scrambling algorithm
| feature requests go on trac, not the forums |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
1 |
6,534 |
11-07-2014, 05:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How is keyspace calculated
Post: RE: How is keyspace calculated
| for -a 3, --keyspace is not the full keyspace of the attack as you might expect, but rather the keyspace of the base loop excluding the modifier. it's pretty complicated, that's why atom recommends y... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
6,544 |
05-24-2014, 01:45 AM |
