Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views [desc] Posted
    Thread: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
Post: RE: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)

how are you measuring this? or is this from memory only.
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 7 9,748 12-06-2014, 04:25 PM
    Thread: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
Post: RE: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)

ok...
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 7 9,748 12-07-2014, 03:56 AM
    Thread: No AMD/SDS Compatible Platform Found
Post: RE: No AMD/SDS Compatible Platform Found

use the cudaHashcat-plus binary, not the oclHashcat-plus binary.
epixoip Old hashcat Support 1 9,764 03-26-2013, 09:58 AM
    Thread: how to cracking with mobility vga card (laptop)
Post: RE: how to cracking with mobility vga card (laptop...

what OS? what driver?
epixoip General Help 5 9,782 03-21-2013, 04:45 PM
    Thread: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
Post: RE: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT

This is likely your problem: Quote: -- -w 2 --gpu-temp-retain 45 -- Get rid of --gpu-temp-retain and use -w 3. Your 7870 is also clocked at 725 Mhz instead of 975 Mhz, so that's another ...
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 7 9,783 12-29-2014, 11:45 AM
    Thread: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
Post: RE: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT

Ok, so with the proper workload settings you're getting 102.7 KH/s - 103.3 KH/s with your 7870, which aligns perfectly with the theoretical max performance of 106.9 KH/s. Therefore oclHashcat is quite...
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 7 9,783 12-29-2014, 10:08 PM
    Thread: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
Post: RE: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT

First, there is no "special limitation." Second, those other programs are lying to you. Your GPU has 1536 cores @ 975 Mhz, and WPA2 has ~ 14000000 instructions. Therefore the theoretical maximum pe...
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 7 9,783 12-29-2014, 10:54 AM
    Thread: Dictionnary handling
Post: RE: Dictionnary handling

most likely whatever order readdir() returns the files in.
epixoip General Help 4 9,784 06-16-2012, 10:36 AM
    Thread: Benchmark dies on 64bits (32bit ok)
Post: RE: Benchmark dies on 64bits (32bit ok)

Did you try with 1.33?
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 4 9,790 02-17-2015, 01:04 AM
    Thread: Stopping decoding
Post: RE: Stopping decoding

are you asking how you can restore a session that was interrupted?
epixoip Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 6 9,799 07-11-2013, 02:09 PM
    Thread: Stopping decoding
Post: RE: Stopping decoding

read the output of --help and the wiki, you will see --restore
epixoip Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 6 9,799 07-11-2013, 02:58 PM
    Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?

Yep, looks like your problem is the high reject rate. Spending more time rejecting than it is cracking.
epixoip Old oclHashcat Support 8 9,828 04-22-2015, 02:36 AM
    Thread: password problem help please
Post: RE: password problem help please

it's not a script, it's pseudo code. you can use it as a model to write your own program.
epixoip General Talk 4 9,851 01-03-2013, 12:48 AM
    Thread: fgdump layout
Post: RE: fgdump layout

they are called machine accounts. https://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2009/02/15/test2.aspx yes, they are ntlm hashes. iirc they are 14-character random passwords.
epixoip General Help 6 9,873 11-12-2014, 07:46 PM
    Thread: fgdump layout
Post: RE: fgdump layout

i believe machine hashes are used to join machines to the domain, so if you crack a machine hash, then i believe you can use it to join a rogue machine to the domain. edit: but you are very unlikely ...
epixoip General Help 6 9,873 11-12-2014, 08:06 PM
    Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?

1. You're comparing single hash speeds to multi-hash speeds, and dict + rules to brute force, etc. These are not an apples v oranges comparisons. 2. My benchmarks are at +250Mhz. You said you're runn...
epixoip Hardware 7 9,884 01-18-2016, 01:37 AM
    Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?

Well when you say you're comparing apples and oranges, you're saying 8100 MH/s for brute force, but that must be multi-hash not single hash. Multi-hash loses about 50% performance over single hash, so...
epixoip Hardware 7 9,884 01-18-2016, 03:15 AM
    Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?

No. GFLOPS has literally nothing to do with hash cracking, as hash algorithms use integer math, not floating point math. Just because a device is good at floating point math doesn't necessarily mean i...
epixoip Hardware 7 9,884 01-18-2016, 06:57 PM
    Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?

Wait, you do not need to physically connect a monitor to card to set the fan speeds! You can simply tell the driver a monitor is connected even when one isn't. This is most easily accomplished with th...
epixoip Hardware 7 9,884 01-19-2016, 01:16 AM
    Thread: Basic Questions - Hashs
Post: RE: Basic Questions - Hashs

jharris473 Wrote: (10-18-2012, 07:13 PM) -- Sorry for such a basic question - How does hashcat actually get "hashes" from a Windows network. The network is "switched-based". Please, any help is app...
epixoip General Help 5 9,892 10-19-2012, 09:00 AM