Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
Post: RE: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
how are you measuring this? or is this from memory only. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,748 |
12-06-2014, 04:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
Post: RE: Very slow at the end (>=1.30)
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,748 |
12-07-2014, 03:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: No AMD/SDS Compatible Platform Found
Post: RE: No AMD/SDS Compatible Platform Found
use the cudaHashcat-plus binary, not the oclHashcat-plus binary. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
9,764 |
03-26-2013, 09:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: how to cracking with mobility vga card (laptop)
Post: RE: how to cracking with mobility vga card (laptop...
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
9,782 |
03-21-2013, 04:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
Post: RE: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
This is likely your problem:
Quote:
--
-w 2 --gpu-temp-retain 45
--
Get rid of --gpu-temp-retain and use -w 3.
Your 7870 is also clocked at 725 Mhz instead of 975 Mhz, so that's another ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,783 |
12-29-2014, 11:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
Post: RE: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
Ok, so with the proper workload settings you're getting 102.7 KH/s - 103.3 KH/s with your 7870, which aligns perfectly with the theoretical max performance of 106.9 KH/s. Therefore oclHashcat is quite... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,783 |
12-29-2014, 10:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
Post: RE: Very very smallest the cracking speed 7870 XT
First, there is no "special limitation."
Second, those other programs are lying to you. Your GPU has 1536 cores @ 975 Mhz, and WPA2 has ~ 14000000 instructions. Therefore the theoretical maximum pe... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,783 |
12-29-2014, 10:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Dictionnary handling
Post: RE: Dictionnary handling
most likely whatever order readdir() returns the files in. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
4 |
9,784 |
06-16-2012, 10:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: Benchmark dies on 64bits (32bit ok)
Post: RE: Benchmark dies on 64bits (32bit ok)
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,790 |
02-17-2015, 01:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: Stopping decoding
Post: RE: Stopping decoding
are you asking how you can restore a session that was interrupted? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
9,799 |
07-11-2013, 02:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: Stopping decoding
Post: RE: Stopping decoding
read the output of --help and the wiki, you will see --restore |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
9,799 |
07-11-2013, 02:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Yep, looks like your problem is the high reject rate. Spending more time rejecting than it is cracking. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,828 |
04-22-2015, 02:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: password problem help please
Post: RE: password problem help please
it's not a script, it's pseudo code. you can use it as a model to write your own program. |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
4 |
9,851 |
01-03-2013, 12:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: fgdump layout
Post: RE: fgdump layout
they are called machine accounts.
https://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2009/02/15/test2.aspx
yes, they are ntlm hashes. iirc they are 14-character random passwords. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
9,873 |
11-12-2014, 07:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: fgdump layout
Post: RE: fgdump layout
i believe machine hashes are used to join machines to the domain, so if you crack a machine hash, then i believe you can use it to join a rogue machine to the domain.
edit: but you are very unlikely ... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
9,873 |
11-12-2014, 08:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
1. You're comparing single hash speeds to multi-hash speeds, and dict + rules to brute force, etc. These are not an apples v oranges comparisons.
2. My benchmarks are at +250Mhz. You said you're runn... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 01:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
Well when you say you're comparing apples and oranges, you're saying 8100 MH/s for brute force, but that must be multi-hash not single hash. Multi-hash loses about 50% performance over single hash, so... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 03:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
No. GFLOPS has literally nothing to do with hash cracking, as hash algorithms use integer math, not floating point math. Just because a device is good at floating point math doesn't necessarily mean i... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 06:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
Wait, you do not need to physically connect a monitor to card to set the fan speeds! You can simply tell the driver a monitor is connected even when one isn't. This is most easily accomplished with th... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-19-2016, 01:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Basic Questions - Hashs
Post: RE: Basic Questions - Hashs
jharris473 Wrote: (10-18-2012, 07:13 PM)
--
Sorry for such a basic question - How does hashcat actually get "hashes" from a Windows network. The network is "switched-based". Please, any help is app... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
9,892 |
10-19-2012, 09:00 AM |