Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.
hashcat Forum › Search
Results

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views [asc] Posted
    Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
... is this a real question?
 epixoip Hardware 28 44,389 02-08-2013, 11:09 PM
    Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
there are lots of factors that influence speed. freaking out over a 20K variance is unwarranted.
 epixoip Hardware 28 44,389 02-08-2013, 11:28 PM
    Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
there is nothing wrong with your card.
 epixoip Hardware 28 44,389 02-09-2013, 12:39 AM
    Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
you should use --gpu-loops 4096 with WPA.
 epixoip Hardware 28 44,389 02-09-2013, 01:30 PM
    Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
exus_28 doesn't have a problem.
 epixoip Hardware 28 44,389 02-11-2013, 01:35 AM
    Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
your command is correct. brute forcing wpa is braindead.
 epixoip Hardware 28 44,389 02-12-2013, 06:44 AM
    Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
The numbers in your benchmark are actually a bit low. At 925 Mhz, single hash NTLM performance should be about 15700 MH/s per GPU, or 125.6 GH/s total. But actually stock clock for your 7990 should be...
 epixoip User Contributions 20 44,139 10-20-2013, 08:37 PM
    Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
this is more like what you should be seeing for single ntlm brute force: Code: -- [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s Session.Name...: oclHashcat-lite Status.........: Running Hash.Target.....
 epixoip User Contributions 20 44,139 10-21-2013, 03:30 AM
    Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
i'm just going to leave this right here... Code: -- [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [q]uit => s Session.Name...: oclHashcat Status.........: Running Input.Mode.....: Mask (?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a...
 epixoip User Contributions 20 44,139 12-29-2013, 05:25 PM
    Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
8x R9 290X @ 1200 Mhz, Catalyst 13.12, oclHashcat 1.00
 epixoip User Contributions 20 44,139 12-30-2013, 01:11 AM
    Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
i have yet to get these cards over 72C! but that said, i do get asic hangs at 1200 Mhz at stock voltage. need to adjust the voltage a tick to make them stable.
 epixoip User Contributions 20 44,139 12-30-2013, 03:01 AM
    Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
yeah in the benchmarks i did, i tested at a memory clock of 1375 since that is the 7970's default memory clock. not sure if you've seen those or not yet, but i posted a link on twitter.
 epixoip User Contributions 20 44,139 12-30-2013, 05:53 AM
    Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
What OS?
 epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 22 44,002 02-17-2013, 02:43 AM
    Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
But what version of Windows, smartass? :)
 epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 22 44,002 02-17-2013, 02:58 AM
    Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
M@LIK Wrote: (02-17-2013, 07:42 PM) -- epixoip Wrote: -- But what version of Windows, smartass? :) -- alexusswe Wrote: -- Im using Windows 7 64Bit -- Now what, smartass? -- Oh I don't know, I don...
 epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 22 44,002 02-18-2013, 07:10 AM
    Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
there's nothing in your screenshot to indicate that the cpu version is not working on your box. looks to me like you didn't really give it much work to do so it finished almost immediately.
 epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 22 44,002 02-23-2013, 09:22 AM
    Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
i see output in your screenshot. if you're looking for the status, you won't see it unless you press 'enter' in that window, just like it tells you. if you gave it a larger workload you would probably...
 epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 22 44,002 02-23-2013, 07:00 PM
    Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
it only writes to the output file if it actually cracks something.
 epixoip Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 22 44,002 02-24-2013, 09:09 AM
    Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
you're chaining too many rules together.
 epixoip Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 26 43,866 10-22-2013, 07:48 PM
    Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: (kindof) Newbie questions (hardware, amazon ec...
son of a bitch
 epixoip General Help 17 43,217 01-09-2014, 03:31 AM