|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Build Spec Review
Post: RE: Build Spec Review
| that chassis you linked to definitely won't hold four GPUs.
the best chassis for the UD7 is Chenbro RM41300-FS81. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
23,979 |
11-27-2013, 09:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Build Spec Review
Post: RE: Build Spec Review
|
brav0hax Wrote: (11-27-2013, 08:19 PM)
--
Thats good to know...but I am curious because I see boxes with like 8-10 7990s and not watercooling so somebody has it figured out somewhere ;-)
--
the mos... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
23,979 |
11-27-2013, 09:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Build Spec Review
Post: RE: Build Spec Review
| you need a server chassis with high static pressure fans |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
23,979 |
11-28-2013, 12:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack !
Post: RE: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack ...
| cannot reproduce. positive you're using the correct driver version? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
23,941 |
03-05-2013, 03:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack !
Post: RE: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack ...
| above you said oclHashcat-plus.exe, now you're saying cudaHashcat-plus.exe? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
23,941 |
03-05-2013, 12:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack !
Post: RE: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack ...
| Please open a ticket on Trac. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
23,941 |
03-06-2013, 04:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat v3?
Post: RE: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat...
| Are you actually getting any kind of decent hitrate from the unsupported rules? I wouldn't think that you are. Seems like a lot of effort for very little return. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
16 |
23,766 |
07-20-2016, 03:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: O H/sec with PhpBB
Post: RE: O H/sec with PhpBB
| for salted algorithms, each plaintext candidate has to be hashed with each unique salt. therefore when cracking salted hashes, your effective speed is the total speed divided by number of unique salts... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
23,752 |
01-13-2014, 09:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() : -1 : CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND Help PLz
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() : -1 : CL_DEVICE_NOT_F...
| For Debian and The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) you may be able to install my Intel OpenCL .deb at https://github.com/stricture/intel-opencl/releases/tag/16.1_1.2_5.2.0.10002_... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
11 |
23,740 |
09-14-2016, 08:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus Benchmark Script
Post: oclHashcat-plus Benchmark Script
| Just a little shell script radix and I whipped up for benchmarking oclHashcat-plus. Written in (mostly) portable POSIX shell, so it should work in any shell on any distro. Let me know if you have prob... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
23,657 |
02-01-2013, 05:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha1($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha...
| sha1(pass.salt) and sha1(salt.pass) are two different algorithms. if you need sha1(salt.pass) then you cannot use lite.
but if you have a hash in user:hash format, what leads you to believe it is a s... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
23,610 |
03-27-2013, 06:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha1($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha...
| oh, osx 10.4 hashes, ok. so in that case, you will need to do a little work to use hashcat with this algorithm.
the algorithm is sha1(salt.pass), and the salt is a four-byte hex salt prepended to the... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
23,610 |
03-27-2013, 08:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha1($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha...
| actually i just realized you said you were using a vm, in that case you wouldn't be able to use litecat or pluscat anyway. you can only use hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
23,610 |
03-27-2013, 08:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
| your problem sounds like it's heat or power related. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
23,609 |
09-22-2014, 07:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
| that's a tricky one to troubleshoot, great job pinpointing the issue |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
23,609 |
10-25-2014, 02:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
Post: RE: Hashcat bruteforcing with spezial rules
| Do not request help cracking a hash or offer a cash reward. This is against the forum rules.
Basically what you are looking for here is a mask attack. https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attac... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
17 |
23,547 |
04-01-2015, 11:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
Post: RE: Hashcat bruteforcing with spezial rules
| You will need multiple masks to accomplish this, so you should probably use an hcmask file.
I will help you construct one mask. You will need to construct the others.
-1 '.,' -2 ';.-_):' '!Ii!... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
17 |
23,547 |
04-01-2015, 01:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
Post: RE: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
| Those masks are looking good. Unfortunately since your custom charset includes a comma, and hcmasks use commas to separate fields, an hcmask file would not work. So what you'll need to do is run each ... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
17 |
23,547 |
04-01-2015, 09:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
Post: RE: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
| I've not tested attempting to escape commas in the custom charset, but you can try.
So the first two lines of your hcmask file (based on the masks you generated above) would be:
.\,,;.-_):,!Ii!?... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
17 |
23,547 |
04-01-2015, 10:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
Post: RE: Hashcat bruteforcing with special rules
| Yes, that's precisely how you would script it out as I suggested.
OS is irrelevant.
No, a slash is not a problem.
No, the size of the container is irrelevant. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
17 |
23,547 |
04-02-2015, 01:21 AM |
