|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 7 GPU set-up
Post: RE: 7 GPU set-up
| The GTX 970 reference design is a unicorn, you'd be lucky to find one let alone seven of them. The ASUS card you linked to is a good card though. The estimated wattage for 7x GTX 970 is 980 ~ 1100 wat... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
18,950 |
07-17-2015, 09:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 7 GPU set-up
Post: RE: 7 GPU set-up
| Either one of those will be just fine |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
18,950 |
07-18-2015, 12:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 7 GPU set-up
Post: RE: 7 GPU set-up
| No. No. No. And also no.
First, I just recommend the GTX 970, not the Titan X. I never mentioned the Titan X in this thread, nor did I mention anything about the Tyan chassis. In fact, rarely do I ev... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
18,950 |
07-17-2015, 06:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: lack of transpancey
Post: RE: lack of transpancey
| you wonder why there is no "transpancey", yet you have not made any effort to get involved with hashcat. this is your first post on the forums, we've never seen you on IRC, you've never filed any repo... |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
7 |
18,932 |
01-30-2014, 06:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AES
Post: RE: AES
| It's still impossible to brute force 2^128, let alone 2^256. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
18,866 |
01-31-2016, 02:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Building 8xhd7970
Post: RE: Building 8xhd7970
| if you want to build an 8 GPU rig, you really should use a TYAN FT77B7015. it will save you a TON of headaches.
https://ob-security.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/P1010020.jpg
https://ob-security.info... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
18,844 |
02-08-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Building 8xhd7970
Post: RE: Building 8xhd7970
| it's not available in stores in the US either, just from companies who drop-ship it from Tyan.
i'm sure Tyan will ship to Poland, just shoot them an email. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
18,844 |
02-08-2013, 09:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Building 8xhd7970
Post: RE: Building 8xhd7970
| he'll go over budget doing it the other way, too. it's more complicated the other way, and as he builds and tests it he'll realize he needs to buy this, that and the other to get it working. it'll tur... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
18,844 |
02-09-2013, 12:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ati 7990 x4
Post: RE: ati 7990 x4
| optimal loops for wpa is 4096, not 1024. keyspace is a bit odd for benchmarking. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
18,813 |
10-22-2013, 07:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ati 7990 x4
Post: RE: ati 7990 x4
| you will need to use --status and --status-timer with vcl |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
18,813 |
10-22-2013, 07:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Not a single percent of progress : (
Post: RE: Not a single percent of progress : (
| the problem is likely due to you using "combination" mode. oclHashcat-plus can only accept password candidates that are shorter than 16 characters, and by combining the words in your "premium_wordlist... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
18,789 |
01-09-2013, 12:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Not a single percent of progress : (
Post: RE: Not a single percent of progress : (
| The GUI you are using is a third party GUI developed by Blandy. It's not officially supported here, but maybe if you're lucky he will see your post and help answer your questions.
My advice is to jus... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
18,789 |
01-09-2013, 12:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't reverse known hash ?
Post: RE: Can't reverse known hash ?
| You're missing a mask. But that hash is too slow to brute force anyway. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
15 |
18,780 |
08-14-2015, 01:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bcrypt recovery with known salt?
Post: RE: Bcrypt recovery with known salt?
| it would help if you posted your command line.
also, if you're going to specify a username before the hash, you need to use the --username flag. otherwise, get rid of it and just supply the hash. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
4 |
18,779 |
12-29-2013, 12:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| why would you use -u 320 for wpa? that doesn't make any sense. use -u 4096
Code:
--
epixoip@butters:~/oclHashcat-1.01$ ./oclHashcat64.bin -m 2500 -b
oclHashcat v1.01 starting in benchmark-mode.... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-06-2014, 07:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| did you prepare your wordlists? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-06-2014, 09:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| hm, that's really weird. are you giving them enough work to do? maybe you can post the output of `s' during a run. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-07-2014, 05:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| ah yep, that's it. he's cracking 10 different hashes with 10 different salts. 13099 * 10 = 130990 H/s which is the expected speed. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-07-2014, 08:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
| This is a visual bug only, it still finds the correct password. What you are seeing is not a "corrupt" hash, but rather the byte-swapped hash (SHA1 is big endian, x86 is little endian.) This is actual... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 08:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
| Here's some code to illustrate what is happening inside Hashcat:
Code:
--
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
uint32_t hash[5];
uint32_t bswap_hash[5];
s... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 08:31 PM |
