|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: mask order change
Post: RE: mask order change
| No, the order in the charset does matter as long as you are using the --markov-disable flag, which is precisely what rico said. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
14,234 |
02-17-2016, 02:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: mask order change
Post: RE: mask order change
| No, don't doubt yourself. Yes, your character set is too small. There's a reason the old default charsets & mask were as follows:
Code:
--
-1 ae10i2onrls938t45m67cdyhubkgpjvfwzAxEILORNSMTCDBqHYK... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
14,234 |
02-17-2016, 02:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
| Not really enough information to go off of. Which CPUs specifically? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-16-2015, 06:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
| In this specific instance the single X5690 will be faster.
E5430 - quad core, no HT
X5690 - six core with HT
That's 8 threads @ 2.66 Ghz vs 12 threads @ 3.46 ~ 3.73 Ghz. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-16-2015, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
| That's a fair question. I'm assuming this is old, decommissioned hardware that being sold for like $10 or something (at least I hope he's not paying more than that for it.) It will be noisy and power-... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-16-2015, 09:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
| Hmm, stretching my memory to remember and too lazy to Google, but I *believe* the X5690 is equivalent to an i7 990X. So it was a pretty sweet processor for its time, but it *is* nearly 5 years old.
... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-17-2015, 07:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Job Listing - Fix hashcat!
Post: RE: Job Listing - Fix hashcat!
| i don't understand. in your freelancer thread you talk about following my linux server howto on the wiki... but then you're also talking about nvidia drivers? that guide is only for amd |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
8 |
14,158 |
10-06-2013, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Help me get the result, please.
Post: RE: Help me get the result, please.
|
nutflush Wrote: (06-20-2013, 11:11 PM)
--
Hint: there are 6,652,800 possible plaintext strings that can be generated by this regular expression
--
no. 11^8 = 214,358,881 combinations.
but you ca... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
8 |
14,133 |
06-21-2013, 12:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Help me get the result, please.
Post: RE: Help me get the result, please.
| you wouldn't use permute.bin, you'd use maskprocessor.
Code:
--
./mp64.bin -1 'defnopqrst|' ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
--
|
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
8 |
14,133 |
06-21-2013, 10:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
Post: RE: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
| it's just the way your terminal is representing those characters. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
7 |
14,129 |
09-04-2013, 07:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Supported ATI GPUs?
Post: RE: Supported ATI GPUs?
| All AMD Radeon HD 5xxx, 6xxx, and 7xxx GPUs are supported.
You can find a comprehensive list of devices here:
https://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/heterogeneous-computing/amd-accelerated-parall... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
14,124 |
05-23-2013, 11:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| No, it's not a nice choice at all. The R9 Nano is a piece of shit, stay far away from it. Don't buy into AMD's lies about low power consumption.
You said you had a HD7990 and it had insane power usag... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-22-2015, 08:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| You'll likely be fine with the mini if you want to go that route. Normally I'm vehemently opposed to OEM design cards, but the GTX 970 is kind of the exception to the rule for two reasons,
1. The r... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-24-2015, 09:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| There's no official release date for Pascal. Everything that is out there is all rumors and speculation. And "a lot faster" at pushing pixels rarely translates into faster for password cracking -- we ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-26-2015, 09:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| Not necessarily. Floating point operations are handled by the FPUs, not the ALUs. Each CUDA core currently has one FPU and one ALU (referred to in the diagram below as the "FP unit and "INT unit.")
... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-27-2015, 12:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Want to calculate Sha1 through Rent supercomputer.
Post: RE: Want to calculate Sha1 through Rent supercompu...
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
4 |
14,071 |
01-16-2014, 08:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: cudaHashcat 0 H/s bcrypt
Post: RE: cudaHashcat 0 H/s bcrypt
| 0 H/s in this case doesn't mean literally "no hashes per second", it means the kernel is taking too long to run and hasn't reached a checkpoint yet and thus the main thread is not able to calculate th... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
14,071 |
04-04-2016, 07:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: reuse restore file after upgrade (was oclHashcat v1.01)
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.01
| no, this is not possible. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,058 |
01-05-2014, 02:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
Post: RE: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
| maybe upgrade to catalyst 13.8 beta1 and oclHashcat-plus 0.15? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,055 |
10-07-2013, 11:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
Post: RE: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
| clinfo only shows one gpu, so the problem is with your opencl platform, not with hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,055 |
10-07-2013, 01:11 PM |
