|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
| We don't measure "hash correctness", this is not an issue. We measure stability by whether or not the GPU hangs at certain frequencies.
And you could easily measure "hash correctness" by running a li... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
22 |
65,496 |
05-15-2015, 05:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
| Not going to say it's impossible but this is not something that has been observed. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
22 |
65,496 |
05-15-2015, 06:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
| The GPU will hang very quickly if the frequency is unstable.
You'd have to do some serious overvolting to get much more of an overclock out of these GPUs. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
22 |
65,496 |
05-15-2015, 06:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
| Those don't stress the ALUs though, which are all we care about. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
22 |
65,496 |
05-16-2015, 08:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
txczwgffr Wrote: (10-11-2013, 05:59 PM)
--
Do you not think hashcat would be better if more people could contribute?
--
absolutely not. |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,490 |
10-11-2013, 07:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| you know what else is a nice compromise? not having to pay money to use the program. |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,490 |
10-14-2013, 02:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| "linux is better than windows" is highly subjective and purely a matter of opinion. there are certainly many things that microsoft does better than the open source community.
probably could have pi... |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,490 |
10-12-2013, 06:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
txczwgffr Wrote: (10-13-2013, 06:43 PM)
--
No one is going to help defend license violations on proprietary code except lawyers the copyright holders pay themselves.
--
and no one is going to go ch... |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,490 |
10-13-2013, 10:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| I'm in favor of a new contest, but it should be against a larger corpus of non-uniqued hashes from multiple sources.
best30 & best100 makes sense, but only as long as best30 is simply the top30 rul... |
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,141 |
04-08-2015, 05:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| rockyou for sure, but linkedin was uniq'd so it's no good for this purpose. |
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,141 |
04-11-2015, 09:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| I strongly disagree, James. Duplicates are essential for sorting rules by probability. Just as you'd never generate an hcstat file with a wordlist that's been uniq'd. By removing duplicates you are sk... |
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,141 |
04-13-2015, 09:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| Presumably we'd be working against a list of plains, not hashes, and use -m 9999 to help develop the rules. |
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,141 |
04-15-2015, 09:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| I would kind of like to see a rolling contest, one that never really ends. Make it an automated website so there's no manual work involved. You just submit your ruleset, it tallies up the score, then ... |
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,141 |
04-24-2015, 03:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,141 |
04-24-2015, 11:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 2015 Hardware
Post: RE: 4x 7990 build
| vcl is closed source, and there are only binaries for linux x86_64. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
39 |
63,646 |
11-18-2013, 08:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2015 Hardware
Post: RE: 4x 7990 build
| because no one in the HPC world uses Windows. do you know who MOSIX are? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
39 |
63,646 |
11-18-2013, 10:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2015 Hardware
Post: RE: 4x 7990 build
| they do a lot more than sponsor vcl's development. their main business is developing a linux-based cluster operating system... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
39 |
63,646 |
11-19-2013, 01:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 2015 Hardware
Post: RE: 4x 7990 build
| it is on topic. you asked why there are no windows vcl binaries, and if they have intentions of making windows binaries. the answer is they only care about linux binaries, because they only care about... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
39 |
63,646 |
11-19-2013, 03:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 2015 Hardware
Post: RE: 4x 7990 build
| do you really mean > 5000, or do you really mean < 5000? if you mean > 5000, then go with the tyan ft77, hands down. if you mean < 5000, go with a UD7 in a Chenbro RM41300. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
39 |
63,646 |
11-19-2013, 05:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| it's also still GCN, not GCN2. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,905 |
09-26-2013, 07:45 PM |
