Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD published some teasers back in December of last year, but haven't said a word about it since. they continue to release GCN-based GPUs, so i presume GCN2 just simply doesn't exist. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
09-27-2013, 10:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Gig11gs Wrote: (09-30-2013, 11:16 AM)
--
R9 260X and above are GCN 2.0 based
--
no, this was a pre-release rumor. all the official materials from AMD say it's GCN, not GCN2. show me something offic... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-01-2013, 03:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
ok. so, assuming the rumored core configuration is correct, we can conservatively expect a 25-30% increase in performance over the 7970 Ghz Edition, and optimistically expect a 37.5% increase. and pos... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-02-2013, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
nah, it's not risky. that's precisely what the r&d budget is for ;) we'll toss 8 into a tyan ft77 and see how they perform. if they aren't stellar, we can still use them internally. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-02-2013, 05:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
i'll let you know when we are hiring ;) |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-03-2013, 06:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
ouch, that price! you can buy 2x 7990 for that... but i wonder if it's more because it's a special edition or whatever. or maybe this company is just being greedy, trying to rip off the suckers like m... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-03-2013, 12:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-04-2013, 06:44 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
those temps are almost exclusively with the boosted clock. at the base 800 Mhz i think (hope!) it will do a little bit better. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-24-2013, 10:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
we'll do some serious experimentation with ours when we get them, but my hope is that they can be passively cooled. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-24-2013, 10:44 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
yeah, we'll see what newegg sets the price at. they just raised the price on all their 7970s by $40-$80 overnight, so... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-24-2013, 11:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
this is just a guess based on all the information we have so far (core configuration, clock rates, raw compute power, and bitcoin benchmarks), but i reckon that single hash MD5 performance will be so... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-25-2013, 10:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: Brute Force / Mask
Post: RE: Brute Force / Mask
first, you're not going to brute force past length 8 on CPU. you probably won't even get past length 7.
second, you don't need to specify --pw-max
third, -c with -a 3 does nothing
forth, you can r... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
61,416 |
05-16-2013, 02:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
None of the Maxwell cards have issue with heat. Even the Titan X at +225 runs low-mid 60s. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
06-04-2015, 08:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
You're trying to compare single hash brute force vs multi-hash brute force speeds. Apples and oranges comparison. 10.5 GH/s for multi-hash when your single hash kernel gets 16.6 GH/s is pretty damn go... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
06-05-2015, 04:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
Ok, let's math:
Perf/$ (MSRP)
R9 290X: 18.67M
GTX 970: 30.8M
GTX 980: 23.5M
GTX 980Ti: 30.3M
GTX Titan X: 18.9M
Perf/Watt
R9 290X: 34.2M
GTX 970: 72M
GTX 98... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
06-07-2015, 06:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
Usually on register-bound algorithms like MD4 and MD5 the card runs close to TDP (or over TDP in the case of AMD, which is why we have to set Powertune to +50%.) Titan X for example draws 235W at +200... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
06-07-2015, 11:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
MSRP and TDP are fixed variables, and Ivan Golubev's original tables used MSRP. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
06-08-2015, 05:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
346 is the stable branch, so 346.82 would be the recommended driver. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
07-07-2015, 06:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2
Post: RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2
K520 is 5.3x slower than a GTX 970 and 6x slower than a GTX 980, so probably not worth the cost. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
12 |
60,342 |
03-03-2015, 12:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2
Post: RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2
Those speeds are so dismal :P |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
12 |
60,342 |
05-12-2015, 04:49 PM |