|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| get some 5gb partition, install ubuntu there and test of it works. If it does your other installation is screwed. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-04-2013, 07:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13 on Win7 x64
Post: RE: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13...
| so you only need to figure out where your second card went to. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
10,878 |
02-04-2013, 07:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13 on Win7 x64
Post: RE: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13...
| the speed for one card is fine. No idea about the second card. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
10,878 |
02-04-2013, 08:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.14
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
| HD4000 series is not supported anymore. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
35 |
89,008 |
02-04-2013, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
| can reproduce
Code:
--
../oclHashcat-lite-0.14/oclHashcat-lite64.bin deadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeef:abcdef -m110 "?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?a?d?a?d?d" --pw-min=10 --pw-max=12 --hex-salt
oclHashcat-li... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 11:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
| this is not related to this bug and should therefore be in a new thread. Also hashcat works heavily multithreaded, unless you run on cpu with -n1 it will always "mix" the results. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 06:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
| what i said applies to every version of oclhashcat-* too. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 06:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
Post: RE: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
|
Quote:
--
Warning: cudaHashcat-plus64.bin is running from /opt/oclhashcat-plus-bin so be careful of relative paths.
--
mastercracker Wrote: (02-06-2013, 03:09 PM)
--
In this case it consider that a... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
33,732 |
02-06-2013, 03:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
Post: RE: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
| hashcat doesn't care for file extensions. Just read the goddamn error msg...
Quote:
--
Warning: cudaHashcat-plus64.bin is running from /opt/oclhashcat-plus-bin so be careful of relative paths.
--
|
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
33,732 |
02-06-2013, 04:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| all in all the performance is ok. you can tweak --gpu-loops and -n to get some improvement. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-06-2013, 11:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
Post: RE: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
|
mastercracker Wrote: (02-08-2013, 07:39 AM)
--
There has to be a space between -m and 500 also...
--
no space needed. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
33,732 |
02-08-2013, 03:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Building 8xhd7970
Post: RE: Building 8xhd7970
| for hashcracking PCIe x1 is sufficient for the GPUs. You don't need 8x PCIe x16.
Biggest problem will be cooling. Experience of most people is: not more than 4 cards per case (unless you have an open... |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
11 |
18,841 |
02-08-2013, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What type of hash is this?
Post: RE: What type of hash is this?
| either SHA3 or some kind of encryption. |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
2 |
6,654 |
02-08-2013, 07:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
| Maybe put your finger into the fan while it's spinning. Will remove dust and stuff. And is 1125MHz really everything you can do to that card? |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
28 |
44,389 |
02-09-2013, 01:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: automatic password rule analysis and generation
Post: RE: automatic password rule analysis and generatio...
| wow, that's a very cool article. Thanks for linking! |
|
undeath |
User Contributions
|
1 |
7,015 |
02-14-2013, 01:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: IKE file testcase for oclHashcat
Post: RE: IKE file testcase for oclHashcat
| you are improperly saving the file then. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
28,017 |
02-14-2013, 04:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [solved] How to remove numbers from dictionary .txt or .dic
Post: RE: How to remove numbers from dictionary .txt or ...
| msys/mingw is your friend |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
12,710 |
02-14-2013, 04:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
|
squadx Wrote: (02-20-2013, 06:18 PM)
--
So to be clear what I am reading
"Sure, you can easily do -1 012345 9?1?d?d?d?d?d?d "
So to get the remainder of the values in that 9000000000-999999999
Afte... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-20-2013, 07:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
| no exactly. It would not go up to 9100000000 but only 9099999999 |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-21-2013, 12:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
Post: RE: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
|
Wojcio Wrote: (02-26-2013, 12:19 AM)
--
but why no longer supported SL3 ?
--
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1887.html |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
14 |
26,026 |
02-26-2013, 04:33 PM |
