Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
if the same hash appears multiple times it is only removed once. sort -u your hash file before running it through hashcat. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,100 |
03-30-2012, 07:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
i guess you have to use the --hex-salt option |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,490 |
04-06-2012, 05:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus not working in backtrack r2
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus not working in backtrack r2
did you try not to install the sdk but only the driver? If you install the sdk it will never work. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
28,787 |
04-10-2012, 06:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
This is because atom creates custom optimized modules per hash type. If anyone requests md5($salt.$pass) with a 9 char salt (your 8 random chars + "/"), your hashes will be as weak as any other salted... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
18,057 |
04-11-2012, 12:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
As you already realized, cracking this is no problem at all. I think "security through obfuscation" applies here. Never do this, when there is a better way of solving your problem!
The reason for c... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
18,057 |
04-11-2012, 01:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: cuModuleLoad
Post: RE: cuModuleLoad
Did you only download+extract the hotfix? You need to copy it over the normal 0.07 files! |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
8,764 |
04-14-2012, 12:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
Post: RE: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
specify custom charset 1: ?l?d?u and mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
this will run a brutefoce with all passes of length 8. For longer passes you need to specify more ?1.
But this will take very much time... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
21,943 |
04-14-2012, 06:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: cHC+64 skips the first hash O.o
Post: RE: cHC+64 skips the first hash O.o
i think it depends on whether the BOM is set or not. If no BOM is set, everything should be ok. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
10,976 |
04-14-2012, 10:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
Post: RE: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
There are too many zeros ;)
2.400k = 2.400 * 1000 = 2.400 (the dot is not a thousand-separator)
As is said before, WPA takes very much time. You _cannot_ brute-force this in your lifetime. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
21,943 |
04-15-2012, 01:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
The problem is AMD's ram management is not that good. You loose much performance on I/O. If you run millions of hashes frequently, better buy some nvidia cards. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-15-2012, 01:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
Post: RE: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
Brute forcing an upper/lower/digit pass of 10 chars will take too much time, no matter what type of hash.
If you however cannot limit the password to a mask, you need to run a wordlist attack and h... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
21,943 |
04-15-2012, 05:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
are you sure? works fine for me. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,235 |
04-16-2012, 05:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
doesn't work for directories of course. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,235 |
04-16-2012, 10:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to run in windows 7?
Post: RE: How to run in windows 7?
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,470 |
04-22-2012, 03:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
It doesn't really decrement, but there is an overflow.
The reason for having so many rejected ones appearing right after starting is simple: olchashcat-plus caches a part of the dict and at first s... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,225 |
04-25-2012, 09:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
undeath Wrote: (03-30-2012, 07:58 PM)
--
if the same hash appears multiple times it is only removed once. sort -u your hash file before running it through hashcat.
--
|
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,100 |
04-25-2012, 08:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Any progress on this? Still doesn't work. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,305 |
04-28-2012, 03:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
doesn't work for me.
Code:
--
H:\oclHashcat-plus-0.08b60>oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m11 joomla.txt ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d -a3
WARNING: Hashfile 'joomla.txt' in line 1 (hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh:ssss... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,305 |
04-28-2012, 06:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: DES random generated bforcing
Post: RE: DES random generated bforcing
there is no guarantee for a "total random word" not to equal "aaaaaa" |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,480 |
05-06-2012, 08:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: DES random generated bforcing
Post: RE: DES random generated bforcing
phillips321 Wrote: (05-07-2012, 10:08 AM)
--
26*26*10 per character position
* length of 6
--
check your math: (26+26+10)^6 |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,480 |
05-07-2012, 01:40 PM |