|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
| Really, it would be useful if rejection based on min length can be disabled if there is no technical reason to do so. And for WPA there clearly isn't. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 08:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
| Well, the thing is, hashcat does obviously not check the candidates but the input words, which is a significant difference. And only performing the check on the input words does not achieve any of the... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 08:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
| As I said, an option to skip the check would be nice. Because as you have just demostrated the filter is very crude/imperfect and it can easily cause valid candidates to be skipped. And it does not pr... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 10:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is there a mask, if only one (unkown) digit of the pass is wrong?
Post: RE: Is there a mask, if only one (unkown) digit of...
| There is no such mask. Several solutions are possible.
1. create a hcmask file that has a mask for each position you want to alter. eg
Code:
--
?aassword
p?aassword
pa?asword
…
--
2. create a tabl... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
2,510 |
09-02-2018, 12:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is there a mask, if only one (unkown) digit of the pass is wrong?
Post: RE: Is there a mask, if only one (unkown) digit of...
| No, that's simply not something masks were desgined to be used for, hence no such option. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
2,510 |
09-02-2018, 01:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
| @royce: but that "better approach" would only include -S I suppose. Given that WPA, on faster hardware, will be throttled by this it's hardly a proper solution. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
09-03-2018, 11:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Wrong Time Estimated with -w 4 parameter
Post: RE: Wrong Time Estimated with -w 4 parameter
| There can be lots of reasons for this. Some other program may have used the GPU within those four hours, leading to a temporary speed drop. Or maybe thermal throttling kicked in, slowing the cards dow... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
4 |
2,732 |
09-04-2018, 04:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MBP - memory is not enough to use?
Post: RE: MBP - memory is not enough to use?
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,248 |
09-06-2018, 10:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Input and Output user/email:pass
Post: RE: Input and Output user/email:pass
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
4,955 |
09-08-2018, 03:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce partial HASH SHA1
Post: RE: Bruteforce partial HASH SHA1
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,923 |
09-08-2018, 03:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Slow Speed With Tesla V100
Post: RE: Slow Speed With Tesla V100
| You can use -w4 for slightly better speed. Other than that, you are comparing a straight wordlist attack with over 3m hashes with a bruteforce on one single hash. Performance will definitely be worse.... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,542 |
09-09-2018, 04:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Slow Speed With Tesla V100
Post: RE: Slow Speed With Tesla V100
| If you want to compare the speed of two cards at least use the same hash list and the same attack. Everything else is not going to give much meaningful information.
300gb is crap because it will ma... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,542 |
09-09-2018, 04:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Restore File How to Use it
Post: RE: Restore File How to Use it
| only run
Code:
--
hashcat --restore
--
with no additional arguments |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
7 |
4,560 |
09-13-2018, 11:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat64 4.2.1 getting killed OOM
Post: RE: hashcat64 4.2.1 getting killed OOM
| Ideally you have as much RAM as you have VRAM. The lower limit for available system RAM hashcat requires was set to 2GB per opencl device if I remember correctly. (thus, running with only three device... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
2 |
2,121 |
09-17-2018, 10:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
Post: RE: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
| what happens when you run
Code:
--
hashcat64.exe -m 2500 -a3 crackme.hccapx password123
--
?
Try the example hccapx file: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,466 |
09-18-2018, 05:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
Post: RE: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
| as noted otherwise, the password for the example hccapx is "hashcat!" (with trailing exclamation mark) |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,466 |
09-18-2018, 08:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
Post: RE: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
| your input word must be at least eight characters (before rule manipulation), otherwise it'll be skipped |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,466 |
09-18-2018, 09:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Kerberos v.5 hashing key
Post: RE: Kerberos v.5 hashing key
| pretty sure you need to set user/realm/salt appropriately |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
2 |
2,238 |
09-19-2018, 02:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Freeze / no response when trying to see status or output, most of the time
Post: RE: Freeze / no response when trying to see status...
| sounds like an ASIC hang, are you overclocking?
also see this thread: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6202.html |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,008 |
09-25-2018, 09:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
Post: RE: Pls help - simple rule does not work!
|
john2014 Wrote: (09-19-2018, 12:18 AM)
--
If this is the case, why? Maybe because the minimum length for WPA is 8 chars and so the code first rejects BEFORE the rule is applied?
--
exactly
john20... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,466 |
09-19-2018, 08:58 AM |
