Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Well, the thing is, hashcat does obviously not check the candidates but the input words, which is a significant difference. And only performing the check on the input words does not achieve any of the... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 08:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
As I said, an option to skip the check would be nice. Because as you have just demostrated the filter is very crude/imperfect and it can easily cause valid candidates to be skipped. And it does not pr... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 10:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
@royce: but that "better approach" would only include -S I suppose. Given that WPA, on faster hardware, will be throttled by this it's hardly a proper solution. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
09-03-2018, 11:30 AM |
|
|
Thread: First Cracking Rig
Post: RE: First Cracking Rig
certainly depends on how many pcie lanes your board/cpu(s) have |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
19 |
10,139 |
02-19-2019, 06:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: First Cracking Rig
Post: RE: First Cracking Rig
depends on the attacks you run. For wordlist attacks (a0) with no or few rules your bandwidth will limit the cards. With those cards you might even see a bottleneck with slower algorithms such as WPA ... |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
19 |
10,139 |
02-19-2019, 06:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: First Cracking Rig
Post: RE: First Cracking Rig
That technique reduces the bottleneck when using slower pcie bandwidths but doesn't remove it. There certainly is a tradeoff to be made. But if you do intend to run straight wordlist attacks with no o... |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
19 |
10,139 |
02-20-2019, 11:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
how about using oclHashcat with -j option? |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,523 |
11-17-2011, 09:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
the problem is not generating the rules at all but storing them. |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,523 |
11-18-2011, 02:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: mp64: generate total random words
Post: RE: mp64: generate total random words
you might be interested in the fingerprint attack. Take a close look at the expander. (hashcat-utils) |
|
undeath |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
20 |
42,461 |
04-23-2012, 12:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: mp64: generate total random words
Post: RE: mp64: generate total random words
|
undeath |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
20 |
42,461 |
05-06-2012, 04:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
you can try the OSC hash mode. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,862 |
08-06-2012, 12:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
uhm, sorry. Seems like OSC is not supported by lite. Due to the way lite works you should not use a mask like 12345678?1?1?1?1 ... because lite relies on the first part of the plaintext not to be fixe... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,862 |
08-06-2012, 01:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
OSC is md5(salt.pass), however it is not supported by lite. Read my other post. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,862 |
08-06-2012, 01:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDto...
AMD 7970 is currently the fastest card i think. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
20 |
27,494 |
01-12-2013, 02:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
looks like another one to skip. AMD fails so much. Thank you for testing, atom! |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,161 |
01-18-2013, 11:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
nobody ever said this driver is officially supported. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,161 |
01-18-2013, 12:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
12.8 runs fine on 3.6.11. 13.1 will too. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,161 |
01-28-2013, 07:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
as speed doesn't even vary between Win and Linux we can safely assume the kernel won't affect performance at all. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,161 |
01-28-2013, 08:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: hcstatgen not making 32.1MB files
Post: RE: hcstatgen not making 32.1MB files
epixoip Wrote: (01-30-2013, 02:20 AM)
--
æš•à´š
--
that does not look like it is meant to be utf16. While the first character is chinese the second is not. Looks more like arabic. |
|
undeath |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
20 |
38,798 |
01-30-2013, 01:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: need help about crack hash
Post: RE: need help about crack hash
sorry, but hashcat does not replace brains. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
32,451 |
09-07-2014, 05:24 PM |