Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Axcrypt support
Post: RE: Axcrypt support
ANSI is alright, always use it for hash lists. UTF-8 only works when your text editor does not write a BOM (or has a way to disable it).
Your attack looks alright now. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
28 |
15,225 |
08-02-2018, 04:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: Axcrypt support
Post: RE: Axcrypt support
axcrypt is a highly iterated, thus slow, hash. Even for very fast hashes, brute-forcing more than 8 characters is hardly feasible. Brute-force is the last resort if you have no other options. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
28 |
15,225 |
08-03-2018, 11:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any version later than v4.2.1 !!
Post: RE: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any ...
Did you actually read the error message you posted? Your driver is probably broken. There may be driver bugs that are triggered only by some hashcat versions. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
29 |
21,222 |
01-30-2019, 01:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
Post: RE: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
-a 0 is default, so you can omit it. But adding it is not going to cause any problems.
The words in your wordlist must be delimited by a newline character not a comma. |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
29 |
5,284 |
04-17-2020, 11:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
Post: RE: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
A dictionary attack runs each word in your dictionary and applies rules if you specified any. What you describe would be a combinator attack but even that doesn't really fit your use case well.
You... |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
29 |
5,284 |
04-20-2020, 12:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
Post: RE: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
whops, minor typo on my part. Should be -a 6 not -a 0
?s201?d is a mask |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
29 |
5,284 |
04-20-2020, 01:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
Post: RE: Dictiionary Attack - how-to-question
Are you sure you were running the command with -a 6? The error message shows an error for the -a 1 kernel. |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
29 |
5,284 |
04-22-2020, 12:17 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
did not read properly. meh. |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,028 |
04-05-2015, 10:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
InfDoleo Wrote: (04-09-2015, 03:36 AM)
--
Any chance in the next version, one side of the combo attack can be piped?
--
use a fifo |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,028 |
04-09-2015, 05:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Line-length exception....
Post: RE: Line-length exception....
maybe a BOM problem? Or even a totally weird encoding like UTF16? |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
30 |
23,352 |
01-16-2018, 12:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Line-length exception....
Post: RE: Line-length exception....
hashcat returns a completely different error, that is definitely a different problem. Have you tried saving as UTF8 (no BOM)? |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
30 |
23,352 |
01-17-2018, 01:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Line-length exception....
Post: RE: Line-length exception....
Hashes generally have to be in one single line. Your browser probably adds line breaks on the example hash page for easier readability. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
30 |
23,352 |
01-20-2018, 02:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Line-length exception....
Post: RE: Line-length exception....
onis_uk Wrote: (01-21-2018, 11:02 AM)
--
$ethereum$s*262144*8*1*
but the example has was
$ethereum$s*262144*1*8*
so I swapped the 1 and 8 around
--
that will make your hash uncrackable. those are... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
30 |
23,352 |
01-21-2018, 06:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
Post: RE: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
There's a problem with the 5.1.0 version and AMD cards. This problem is fixed in the beta version. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
31 |
12,818 |
08-28-2019, 10:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
get some 5gb partition, install ubuntu there and test of it works. If it does your other installation is screwed. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-04-2013, 07:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
all in all the performance is ok. you can tweak --gpu-loops and -n to get some improvement. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-06-2013, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Mangix Wrote: (05-22-2013, 02:44 PM)
--
Is it me or is a titan faster than a 7970 at Whirlpool based on those results? If so, why?
--
orks and golems are also damn fast! |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,766 |
05-22-2013, 11:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Electrum support - aes_decrypt (sha256 (sha256 ($pass), $data)
Post: RE: Anyone interested in being paid to add support...
atom Wrote: (06-27-2017, 11:32 AM)
--
Is this something useful for other people too? How many people use this wallet?
--
By my estimation electrum is the most popular offline wallet for bitcoin, li... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
32 |
25,733 |
06-27-2017, 04:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
atom Wrote: (04-11-2015, 07:53 PM)
--
Finally the more important question than the one how many rules we want is how we do it and which reference hashes we use.
--
The last contest lead to rather du... |
|
undeath |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,152 |
04-11-2015, 08:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
I'm not sure if uniq'ed wordlists pose a problem for this contest (linkedin). I guess the difference between total number of cracked passwords vs unique cracked passwords is relatively small because c... |
|
undeath |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,152 |
04-13-2015, 04:55 PM |