|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to recover a blockchain.info wallet
Post: RE: Trying to recover a blockchain.info wallet
| What hardware are you using? Can you try with the beta version? https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
14 |
3,929 |
12-11-2019, 12:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to recover a blockchain.info wallet
Post: RE: Trying to recover a blockchain.info wallet
| Note that post is about v1 blockchain wallets only. I don't know if it applies to v2 wallets as well. And if the hash gets loaded excessive data length should make no difference in cracking a v2 hash.... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
14 |
3,929 |
12-11-2019, 04:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to recover a blockchain.info wallet
Post: RE: Trying to recover a blockchain.info wallet
| that just means hashcat can't find the myhash.txt file |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
14 |
3,929 |
12-11-2019, 11:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Gpu Limit
Post: RE: Gpu Limit
| 1. Don't buy AMD cards for hashcat.
2. How are you going to cool that many GPUs?
3. Mining rigs are not usually what you can use well with hashcat. They are lacking RAM and for most attacks you will... |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
14 |
4,531 |
01-16-2020, 11:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Gpu Limit
Post: RE: Gpu Limit
| What type of hashes are you going to crack and what attacks do you plan to run? |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
14 |
4,531 |
01-16-2020, 10:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Gpu Limit
Post: RE: Gpu Limit
| If you are only going to do bruteforce you might get away with a repurposed mining rig, but you should be aware that those will have low performance for pretty much everything other kind of attack and... |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
14 |
4,531 |
01-17-2020, 01:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Catalyst 11.12
Post: RE: AMD Catalyst 11.12
| on my 5850 the speed is about the same, but more likely +1% than -1%. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
15 |
31,830 |
12-18-2011, 12:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
| the algorithm does not feature salts. You cannot do this with any hashcat version. |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-23-2012, 01:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
| as atom already said, it is not possible to do this with NUL-bytes.
edit: sorry, i mixed the different hashcat versions.
with oclhashcat-* you can use the --hex-charset option with an appropriat... |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-23-2012, 01:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
| as sha256 does not feature salts you simply pretend it was part of the actual plain and therefore use the --hex-charset option. |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-23-2012, 04:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Restore from settings
Post: RE: Restore from settings
|
radix Wrote: (03-18-2012, 01:14 PM)
--
Hashcat already contains a feature to restore a session based on your command line.
--
only -lite has a real restore feature |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
15 |
45,550 |
03-18-2012, 03:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
| It doesn't really decrement, but there is an overflow.
The reason for having so many rejected ones appearing right after starting is simple: olchashcat-plus caches a part of the dict and at first s... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,230 |
04-25-2012, 09:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.08
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.08
| That's really a great step forward. The changelog is simply overwhelming! Thank you for all the effort you put into hashcat! |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
15 |
58,086 |
05-01-2012, 10:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,230 |
05-13-2012, 09:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Start From Stop At Brute Force
Post: RE: Start From Stop At Brute Force
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
29,325 |
06-01-2012, 09:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Start From Stop At Brute Force
Post: RE: Start From Stop At Brute Force
| 1. use custom charsets
2. ???
3. profit! |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
29,325 |
06-02-2012, 12:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Start From Stop At Brute Force
Post: RE: Start From Stop At Brute Force
| what exactly do you think you could leave out?
instance one: -1 ABCDEFGHIJKLM
instance two: -1 NOPQRSTUVWXYZ
nothing easier, neater and more universal. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
29,325 |
06-02-2012, 01:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Start From Stop At Brute Force
Post: RE: Start From Stop At Brute Force
| you set the custom charset mask for the first char only. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
29,325 |
06-02-2012, 01:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Start From Stop At Brute Force
Post: RE: Start From Stop At Brute Force
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (06-02-2012, 12:38 PM)
--
I thought he meant this ...
Code:
--
oclHashcat-plus32.exe --hash-type 2500 -1 ABCDEFGHIJKLM test.hccap -o Found.txt ?1?u?u?u?u?u?uA
--
Then...
Code:
... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
29,325 |
06-02-2012, 01:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 6970 users wanted
Post: RE: 6970 users wanted
| really awful bug. Is there no way to workaround this? |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
15 |
28,649 |
07-18-2012, 11:05 AM |
