Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Kerberoasting not working
Post: RE: Kerberoasting not working
Why are you using force? What is hashcat's status when it finishes? |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
2,397 |
02-21-2020, 12:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Kerberoasting not working
Post: RE: Kerberoasting not working
https://i.imgur.com/j5mxSIW.png
Quote:
--
* Device #1: Intel's OpenCL runtime (GPU only) is currently broken.
We are waiting for updated OpenCL drivers from Intel.
You can use --force to override, b... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
2,397 |
02-21-2020, 12:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Kerberoasting not working
Post: RE: Kerberoasting not working
TealAlex Wrote: (02-21-2020, 09:41 AM)
--
I'm sorry, I'm new to hashcat. As there was no error message, I was assuming what I'm doing is working correctly....
--
Well, there was an error message bu... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
2,397 |
02-21-2020, 01:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: Combinator
Post: RE: Combinator
It's not directly supported. For best performance in your case do it like this:
1. create combined.txt
hashcat -a1 word1.txt word2.txt --stdout -o combined.txt
2. pipe in hybrid combined + mask
hash... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,615 |
05-20-2020, 02:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: Combinator
Post: RE: Combinator
It would work that way but since there are only 3*4=12 words it would be very slow. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,615 |
05-20-2020, 04:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Combinator
Post: RE: Combinator
The case at hand doesn't have much to do with I/O but hashcat's scheduler/parallelisation. Without having any idea about how hashcat's implementation actually works I think you can imagine it to sched... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,615 |
05-21-2020, 02:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: Generator of fortune
Post: RE: Generator of fortune
owein Wrote: (06-18-2020, 05:20 PM)
--
Back to the administrators: please unblock thus thread.
--
this thread is neither locked nor hidden nor anything similar. |
|
undeath |
User Contributions
|
8 |
2,022 |
06-19-2020, 02:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
Post: RE: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
-O is using a different kernel that has some optimizations and should run faster but only works for passwords up to a certain length (depending on the specific hashing function). This length is usuall... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,281 |
06-24-2020, 12:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
Post: RE: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
led5150 Wrote: (06-25-2020, 01:20 AM)
--
Funny enough, it does find it without the -O flag. Would it be safe/reliable to use without it?
--
Unfortunately that's not safe to say. Fact is, there is... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,281 |
06-26-2020, 03:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: RE: Rules in 16800 don't work?
I expect your password is not actually WORD123 but something different. Because WORD123 is only seven characters and thus not a valid WPA2 password.
WPA2 has a minimum password length of eight char... |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
8 |
1,341 |
06-30-2020, 10:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: RE: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Yes, without using -S words from your wordlist shorter than eight bytes will be rejected. |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
8 |
1,341 |
06-30-2020, 11:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: First Attempt, does this look alright?
Post: RE: First Attempt, does this look alright?
hashcat has predefined character sets and I highly recommend them over specifying each letter by itself. Also, the command in the first post seems to have ?1=?2 and ?3=?4 that doesn't make sense. More... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,060 |
07-17-2020, 11:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: Devices being skipped
Post: RE: Devices being skipped
-D is for device types (2 in your case), -d is for individual devices. Try that instead. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,249 |
07-25-2020, 01:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23 (DES support)
Post: [split] Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23 (DES su...
*shock* DES is no option anymore? |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
17,092 |
07-13-2010, 07:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: [split] Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23 (DES support)
Post: RE: Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23
sad to hear this, as I often see DES used on unix systems (of course not for the root acc xD ).
One of the advantages of the DES hash is the support by perl crypt(), whats the reason for being used b... |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
17,092 |
07-14-2010, 07:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Post: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Hi,
i'd like to request a function for oclHashcat-plus to be able to resume a previous cracking process, similiar to the -s switch in hashcat.
(same goes out for oclHashcat, but as this one does... |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,185 |
10-16-2011, 10:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
i found an easy way to resume wordlists without needing to split them. I described it on the wiki page:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/oclhashcat_plus#dictionary_loading |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,185 |
11-01-2011, 05:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Need Help: Trying to Brute Force a salted SHA1 hash for a geocaching puzzle.
Post: RE: Need Help: Trying to Brute Force a salted SHA1...
if you read the documentation/wiki/help you had realized -plus does not support masks (and only passwords up to 15 chars).
The need of double quotes around the string if spaces are used is not hash... |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
21,639 |
11-20-2011, 02:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Need Help: Trying to Brute Force a salted SHA1 hash for a geocaching puzzle.
Post: RE: Need Help: Trying to Brute Force a salted SHA1...
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
21,639 |
11-20-2011, 09:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcatplus debug mode to show rules output
Post: RE: hashcatplus debug mode to show rules output
oclhc-plus does the same rule processing as hashcat. So why don't you use hashcat to see what your rules are doing? |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
16,034 |
12-02-2011, 02:36 AM |