Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
uhm, sorry. Seems like OSC is not supported by lite. Due to the way lite works you should not use a mask like 12345678?1?1?1?1 ... because lite relies on the first part of the plaintext not to be fixe... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,862 |
08-06-2012, 01:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
OSC is md5(salt.pass), however it is not supported by lite. Read my other post. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,862 |
08-06-2012, 01:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDto...
AMD 7970 is currently the fastest card i think. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
20 |
27,488 |
01-12-2013, 02:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
looks like another one to skip. AMD fails so much. Thank you for testing, atom! |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,160 |
01-18-2013, 11:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
nobody ever said this driver is officially supported. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,160 |
01-18-2013, 12:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
12.8 runs fine on 3.6.11. 13.1 will too. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,160 |
01-28-2013, 07:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
as speed doesn't even vary between Win and Linux we can safely assume the kernel won't affect performance at all. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
38,160 |
01-28-2013, 08:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: hcstatgen not making 32.1MB files
Post: RE: hcstatgen not making 32.1MB files
epixoip Wrote: (01-30-2013, 02:20 AM)
--
æš•à´š
--
that does not look like it is meant to be utf16. While the first character is chinese the second is not. Looks more like arabic. |
|
undeath |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
20 |
38,797 |
01-30-2013, 01:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: need help about crack hash
Post: RE: need help about crack hash
sorry, but hashcat does not replace brains. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
20 |
32,449 |
09-07-2014, 05:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: 980GTX MSI vs Reference
Post: RE: 980GTX MSI vs Reference
Go to the nvidia page. Look at the picture. If the card does not look exactly the same it's OEM. |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
20 |
41,557 |
05-25-2015, 01:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: Best Affordable GPU for oclhashcat Q4'15 ???
Post: RE: Best Affordable GPU for oclhashcat Q4'15 ???
970 with reference design are very rare. If you're not running a cracking cluster with multiple cards go for a oem design card. Heat will likely not be your main issue with one single gpu. If you're w... |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
20 |
31,053 |
09-19-2015, 03:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
Post: RE: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
use the latest beta version from https://hashcat.net/beta/ to fix the error with your gpu, |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
20 |
6,851 |
10-09-2019, 10:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
Post: RE: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
https://hashcat.net/forum/uploads/avatars/avatar_85.jpg?dateline=1337188913 |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
20 |
6,851 |
10-09-2019, 11:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
Post: RE: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
If the self test is failing hashcat will be unable to crack hashes. This has nothing to do with speed. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
20 |
6,851 |
10-10-2019, 09:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
Post: RE: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
If you bought the card specifically for hashcat the question is why you chose AMD at all. Their OpenCL runtime is known to be garbage and their hardware is poorly suited for hashcat's purposes, compar... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
20 |
6,851 |
10-11-2019, 12:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
Post: RE: Hashcat sees my GPU but not my CPU
it's the GPU it's the OS it you it the driver, not hashcat |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
20 |
6,851 |
10-11-2019, 12:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Really, it would be useful if rejection based on min length can be disabled if there is no technical reason to do so. And for WPA there clearly isn't. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 08:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Well, the thing is, hashcat does obviously not check the candidates but the input words, which is a significant difference. And only performing the check on the input words does not achieve any of the... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 08:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
As I said, an option to skip the check would be nice. Because as you have just demostrated the filter is very crude/imperfect and it can easily cause valid candidates to be skipped. And it does not pr... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
08-31-2018, 10:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
Post: RE: NTLM vs WPA/WPA2 cracking
@royce: but that "better approach" would only include -S I suppose. Given that WPA, on faster hardware, will be throttled by this it's hardly a proper solution. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
19 |
9,937 |
09-03-2018, 11:30 AM |