|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: DS2432 brute force
Post: RE: DS2432 brute force
| a sha1 hash consists of 20 bytes so whatever you have there does not seem to be a sha1 hash at all. Actually I have never heard of a hash consisting of 8 bytes. (if your salt consists of 56 bytes it d... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
12,410 |
12-08-2011, 03:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: DS2432 brute force
Post: RE: DS2432 brute force
| as long as you expect the password to only consist of valid ascii characters with no specials or control characters the password should be bruteforced within some days using a recent gpu. But if you e... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
12,410 |
12-08-2011, 04:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.08 notes
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.08 notes
| Either my monitor is broken or you get 99% GPU usage. Also you're complaining about not having a big speed increase after a version bump? lol.
Quote:
--
And I have scanned from 0 to 34 % with OCL ... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
16,487 |
12-14-2011, 12:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: fp recieved EOL?
Post: RE: ERROR: fp recieved EOL?
| the left and right rules must be real hashcat rules. Masks don't work there. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
10,685 |
12-14-2011, 10:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
| doesn't help much with a joomla hash :) |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,943 |
12-16-2011, 02:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Catalyst 11.12
Post: RE: AMD Catalyst 11.12
| on my 5850 the speed is about the same, but more likely +1% than -1%. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
15 |
31,821 |
12-18-2011, 12:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Reverse pass and hash on oclHashcat-plus
Post: RE: Reverse pass and hash on oclHashcat-plus
| i don't think this is something to be handled by the hashcat engine.
Reversing a hash itself can be sone by a simple shell command. Reversing the word can be done by using the "r" rule. With the up... |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
7,532 |
12-20-2011, 12:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Don't work Sha-1(base-64)
Post: RE: Don't work Sha-1(base-64)
| these are not exactly SHA1 hashes but base64(hex(sha1($pass))) ones. You need to base64-decode the hashes before you can crack them. |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
12,360 |
01-18-2012, 10:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Generating new custom dictionary
Post: RE: Generating new custom dictionary
| better not generate a wordlist but create a ruleset to create these words. Saves much space and IO.
If you demand on generating the whole dict, create the ruleset and run it through hashcat using t... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
10,538 |
01-22-2012, 08:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Partially known password + md5 hash + trouble cracking
Post: RE: Partially known password + md5 hash + trouble ...
| hashcat cpu does not support reading words from stdin. Therefore this must either be saved into a textfile temporarily or be archived by a corresponding ruleset. (hashcat cpu does not support multiple... |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
5 |
17,242 |
01-28-2012, 04:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Post: RE: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
| ocl* versions are for GPU only. If you want to crack WPA with CPU you won't manage to avoid aircrack. But be warned, it is really slow. (WPA on CPU in general) |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,477 |
01-29-2012, 02:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat and linux
Post: RE: oclhashcat and linux
|
radix Wrote: (01-29-2012, 11:42 PM)
--
1. both
--
i only partly agree here. Of course it doesn't matter if you use a server or desktop distribution but you need a X server running in order to use A... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,917 |
01-30-2012, 03:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite not working
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite not working
| in general you can stick to this rule: every mid-range/high-end desktop gamer card which is not too old is supported. (recommended AMD 5000 series or later) |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
10,378 |
01-30-2012, 03:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl-lite - load hash from file
Post: RE: ocl-lite - load hash from file
| there is no need for converting the salts to hex unless you cannot escape them properly. (what is always possible) |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
10,399 |
02-01-2012, 07:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: what's ntlm hash format
Post: RE: what's ntlm hash format
| simply leave out the username. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,298 |
02-01-2012, 07:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Question
Post: RE: Simple Question
| Is there any difference in performance? If not, i don't even see a reason for x64 libs. While x86 normally runs fine on almost all x64 OS, this does not apply vice versa.
Nevertheless I personally ... |
|
undeath |
User Contributions
|
8 |
15,448 |
02-21-2012, 07:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need help with script.
Post: RE: Need help with script.
| what's wrong with screen? |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
10,924 |
02-21-2012, 10:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need help with script.
Post: RE: Need help with script.
| lol https://www.manpagez.com/man/1/screen/ |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
10,924 |
02-22-2012, 12:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| the beta versions are not publicly available. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,287 |
02-23-2012, 12:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
| the algorithm does not feature salts. You cannot do this with any hashcat version. |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,800 |
02-23-2012, 01:14 PM |
