Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.
hashcat Forum › Search
Results

Search Results
Post Author [asc] Forum Replies Views Posted
    Thread: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13 on Win7 x64
Post: RE: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13...
it's only recognizing one card.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 10,878 02-04-2013, 07:19 PM
    Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
get some 5gb partition, install ubuntu there and test of it works. If it does your other installation is screwed.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 32 54,727 02-04-2013, 07:22 PM
    Thread: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13 on Win7 x64
Post: RE: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13...
so you only need to figure out where your second card went to.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 10,878 02-04-2013, 07:49 PM
    Thread: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13 on Win7 x64
Post: RE: Performance issue, 2x6990 oclHashcat-plus-0.13...
the speed for one card is fine. No idea about the second card.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 10,878 02-04-2013, 08:17 PM
    Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.14
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
HD4000 series is not supported anymore.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements 35 89,008 02-04-2013, 08:18 PM
    Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
can reproduce Code: -- ../oclHashcat-lite-0.14/oclHashcat-lite64.bin deadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeef:abcdef -m110 "?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?a?d?a?d?d" --pw-min=10 --pw-max=12 --hex-salt oclHashcat-li...
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 10 18,755 02-05-2013, 11:46 AM
    Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
this is not related to this bug and should therefore be in a new thread. Also hashcat works heavily multithreaded, unless you run on cpu with -n1 it will always "mix" the results.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 10 18,755 02-05-2013, 06:10 PM
    Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
what i said applies to every version of oclhashcat-* too.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 10 18,755 02-05-2013, 06:55 PM
    Thread: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
Post: RE: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
Quote: -- Warning: cudaHashcat-plus64.bin is running from /opt/oclhashcat-plus-bin so be careful of relative paths. -- mastercracker Wrote: (02-06-2013, 03:09 PM) -- In this case it consider that a...
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 9 33,732 02-06-2013, 03:09 PM
    Thread: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
Post: RE: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
hashcat doesn't care for file extensions. Just read the goddamn error msg... Quote: -- Warning: cudaHashcat-plus64.bin is running from /opt/oclhashcat-plus-bin so be careful of relative paths. --
undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 9 33,732 02-06-2013, 04:40 PM
    Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
all in all the performance is ok. you can tweak --gpu-loops and -n to get some improvement.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 32 54,727 02-06-2013, 11:19 PM
    Thread: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
Post: RE: WARNING: Hash 'crackme': Line-length exception
mastercracker Wrote: (02-08-2013, 07:39 AM) -- There has to be a space between -m and 500 also... -- no space needed.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 9 33,732 02-08-2013, 03:03 PM
    Thread: Building 8xhd7970
Post: RE: Building 8xhd7970
for hashcracking PCIe x1 is sufficient for the GPUs. You don't need 8x PCIe x16. Biggest problem will be cooling. Experience of most people is: not more than 4 cards per case (unless you have an open...
 undeath Hardware 11 18,844 02-08-2013, 06:11 PM
    Thread: What type of hash is this?
Post: RE: What type of hash is this?
either SHA3 or some kind of encryption.
 undeath General Talk 2 6,654 02-08-2013, 07:52 PM
    Thread: HELP!!!
Post: RE: HELP!!!
Maybe put your finger into the fan while it's spinning. Will remove dust and stuff. And is 1125MHz really everything you can do to that card?
 undeath Hardware 28 44,389 02-09-2013, 01:22 AM
    Thread: Min/Max Password Length
Post: RE: Min/Max Password Length
liquiz Wrote: (07-24-2013, 02:14 PM) -- The plan is to bruteforce 1-8 then use oclhashcat for 8-16 and then use hashcat for 17+. -- I lol'd. What's your keyspace like? 5 characters?
 undeath Old hashcat Support 3 15,781 07-24-2013, 06:29 PM
    Thread: automatic password rule analysis and generation
Post: RE: automatic password rule analysis and generatio...
wow, that's a very cool article. Thanks for linking!
 undeath User Contributions 1 7,015 02-14-2013, 01:40 AM
    Thread: IKE file testcase for oclHashcat
Post: RE: IKE file testcase for oclHashcat
you are improperly saving the file then.
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 28,017 02-14-2013, 04:21 PM
    Thread: [solved] How to remove numbers from dictionary .txt or .dic
Post: RE: How to remove numbers from dictionary .txt or ...
msys/mingw is your friend
 undeath General Help 7 12,710 02-14-2013, 04:25 PM
    Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
squadx Wrote: (02-20-2013, 06:18 PM) -- So to be clear what I am reading "Sure, you can easily do -1 012345 9?1?d?d?d?d?d?d " So to get the remainder of the values in that 9000000000-999999999 Afte...
 undeath Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 28 41,890 02-20-2013, 07:34 PM