|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Yet another hash identification problem
Post: RE: Yet another hash identification problem
|
rurapenthe Wrote: (03-31-2012, 07:16 PM)
--
I tried it on 2 sites that crack passwords and both identified it as SHA1. unless its a false-positive. Hashcat usually complains if the hash is incorrect ... |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
16,801 |
03-31-2012, 10:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nead help whit command
Post: RE: Nead help whit command
| https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Using%20the%20spell%20checker |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
31,585 |
04-05-2012, 04:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: question qbout mask and my gpu speed
Post: RE: question qbout mask and my gpu speed
|
Crim3R Wrote: (04-06-2012, 11:53 AM)
--
hi first of all its my first time using hashcat. so sorry for asking noob questions :D
well when im setting the mask like this -1 ?l?u?d?s ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?... |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
13,447 |
04-06-2012, 12:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
| i guess you have to use the --hex-salt option |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,484 |
04-06-2012, 05:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
|
kigg Wrote: (04-08-2012, 07:33 PM)
--
I think it is like this because the code isn't optimised for the new 28nm cards.
--
It is, and has always been, because Nvidia cards suck at GPGPU.
https://i... |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
23 |
70,078 |
04-08-2012, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: where to download autocrack.pl script?
Post: RE: where to download autocrack.pl script?
| This script was for the old oclhashcat and wouldn't work anymore. To beta testers a complete rewrite for oclhashcat-plus is available. I cannot tell you when this will be released in public. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
14,585 |
04-10-2012, 03:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus not working in backtrack r2
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus not working in backtrack r2
| did you try not to install the sdk but only the driver? If you install the sdk it will never work. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
28,782 |
04-10-2012, 06:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| Well, this is not fully correct. The solution is quite simple. Netscape LDAP SSHA has different hashes/salts than OpenLDAP. This should be a separate algorithm.
If i remember right JtR even has dif... |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,257 |
04-10-2012, 06:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
| As you already realized, cracking this is no problem at all. I think "security through obfuscation" applies here. Never do this, when there is a better way of solving your problem!
The reason for c... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
18,052 |
04-11-2012, 01:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Custom password separator in md5($salt.$pass)
| This is because atom creates custom optimized modules per hash type. If anyone requests md5($salt.$pass) with a 9 char salt (your 8 random chars + "/"), your hashes will be as weak as any other salted... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
18,052 |
04-11-2012, 12:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Which drivers for a ATI 5830?
Post: RE: Which drivers for a ATI 5830?
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
13,612 |
04-11-2012, 10:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: cuModuleLoad
Post: RE: cuModuleLoad
| Did you only download+extract the hotfix? You need to copy it over the normal 0.07 files! |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
8,764 |
04-14-2012, 12:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
Post: RE: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
| specify custom charset 1: ?l?d?u and mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
this will run a brutefoce with all passes of length 8. For longer passes you need to specify more ?1.
But this will take very much time... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
21,941 |
04-14-2012, 06:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2x5970 have problam
Post: RE: 2x5970 have problam
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
11 |
22,600 |
04-14-2012, 09:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2x5970 have problam
Post: RE: 2x5970 have problam
| if you run a SL3 rig i recommend water cooling. BTW, please use a spell checker. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
11 |
22,600 |
04-14-2012, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: cHC+64 skips the first hash O.o
Post: RE: cHC+64 skips the first hash O.o
| i think it depends on whether the BOM is set or not. If no BOM is set, everything should be ok. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
10,976 |
04-14-2012, 10:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
Post: RE: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
| There are too many zeros ;)
2.400k = 2.400 * 1000 = 2.400 (the dot is not a thousand-separator)
As is said before, WPA takes very much time. You _cannot_ brute-force this in your lifetime. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
21,941 |
04-15-2012, 01:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
| The problem is AMD's ram management is not that good. You loose much performance on I/O. If you run millions of hashes frequently, better buy some nvidia cards. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-15-2012, 01:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
Post: RE: hashcat-gui v0.5.1 - not work perfectly
| Brute forcing an upper/lower/digit pass of 10 chars will take too much time, no matter what type of hash.
If you however cannot limit the password to a mask, you need to run a wordlist attack and h... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
21,941 |
04-15-2012, 05:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: command problem
Post: RE: command problem
| 0.06 is not supported anymore. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
13,033 |
04-16-2012, 01:06 PM |
