Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: XNMI rule function is not working ?
Post: RE: XNMI rule function is not working ?
rules annotated with "+" on the rules wiki page (https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack) only work with the legacy hashcat-cpu version. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
1,193 |
09-27-2019, 04:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: Yet another "No hashes loaded"
Post: RE: Yet another "No hashes loaded"
are you using the correct mode? |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,195 |
05-25-2015, 01:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Yet another hash identification problem
Post: RE: Yet another hash identification problem
rurapenthe Wrote: (03-31-2012, 07:16 PM)
--
I tried it on 2 sites that crack passwords and both identified it as SHA1. unless its a false-positive. Hashcat usually complains if the hash is incorrect ... |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
16,801 |
03-31-2012, 10:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
get some 5gb partition, install ubuntu there and test of it works. If it does your other installation is screwed. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-04-2013, 07:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
all in all the performance is ok. you can tweak --gpu-loops and -n to get some improvement. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-06-2013, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: zip compressed wordlist
Post: RE: zip compressed wordlist
Such a feature would bloat hashcat. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
6 |
13,784 |
11-07-2012, 08:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: zip compressed wordlist
Post: RE: zip compressed wordlist
I'm pretty sure the zcat command and all others only work with gzip, not zip. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
6 |
13,784 |
11-08-2012, 12:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: [all versions] generic salt handler
Post: RE: [all versions] generic salt handler
i know this can be archived with rules, but only on a per-salt basis. Lists with different salts are hard to cover. |
|
undeath |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
14,149 |
10-23-2011, 01:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: [ask] cap to hccapx
Post: RE: [ask] cap to hccapx
I only know of C implementations |
|
undeath |
User Contributions
|
6 |
6,453 |
12-06-2017, 06:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: [ask] cap to hccapx
Post: RE: [ask] cap to hccapx
If you already have one for hccap it should be easy to adopt to hccapx. |
|
undeath |
User Contributions
|
6 |
6,453 |
12-06-2017, 07:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
can reproduce
Code:
--
../oclHashcat-lite-0.14/oclHashcat-lite64.bin deadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeefdeadbeef:abcdef -m110 "?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?a?d?a?d?d" --pw-min=10 --pw-max=12 --hex-salt
oclHashcat-li... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 11:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
this is not related to this bug and should therefore be in a new thread. Also hashcat works heavily multithreaded, unless you run on cpu with -n1 it will always "mix" the results. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 06:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
what i said applies to every version of oclhashcat-* too. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 06:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug] Hashcat v0.41 & oclHashcat v0.09 crash
Post: RE: [Bug] Hashcat v0.41 & oclHashcat v0.09 crash
cannot reproduce with hashcat 0.42
at least oclHashcat-plus-0.10rc2 seems to work fine, too.
//edit: can reproduce with 0.09, supposedly already fixed in the latest beta. |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,416 |
12-07-2012, 11:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: [bug] oclHashcat-plus not printing plains
Post: RE: [bug] oclHashcat-plus not printing plains
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,478 |
11-07-2011, 02:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: [b] hashcat problems.. please help! thank you [/b]
Post: RE: [b] hashcat problems.. please help! thank you...
you need to define a custom charset and a mask. Currently your mask is "abcdef0123456789". |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
10,346 |
03-30-2015, 06:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Copying] for a long time
Post: RE: [Copying] for a long time
dict is too small. You might need to do this attack differently. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,424 |
05-07-2018, 07:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Copying] for a long time
Post: RE: [Copying] for a long time
efficient attack, ugly edition:
combine salt with each dict word and run -a3 with the mask only
alternatively use --stdout and simply pipe in the -a6 candidates. You don't have proper status but it's... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,424 |
05-07-2018, 09:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Can someone teach me how to crack SMF (sha1($salt.$pass) ) pass with hashcat?
Post: RE: [Help] Can someo
https://hashcat.net/wiki/ |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
21,612 |
05-22-2012, 03:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
doesn't help much with a joomla hash :) |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
12-16-2011, 02:37 PM |