|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Piping in words means every single word needs to be copied from your CPU to the GPU. That's slow! You can get away without speed penalties when using slow hash modes, but for fast hash modes that's ba... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-30-2019, 11:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| I'd guess the mask is still too short and doesn't provide enough work. Numbers are pretty close to the benchmark on all cards but the fastest, the 2080. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-30-2019, 09:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
|
Quote:
--
It's acting like a basic dictionary lookup and ignores the rules parameter completely.
--
You're specifying the rules file for the first instance, rules are applied before they hit the seco... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-31-2019, 08:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: DiskCryptor encrypted ISO
Post: RE: DiskCryptor encrypted ISO
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
2 |
2,371 |
07-31-2018, 09:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Distribute calculations and "verification" hashes
Post: RE: Distribute calculations and "verification" has...
| hashcat is using markov chains to try more probable words first. You can have a look at the next candidates by running a command like
Code:
--
./hashcat64.bin --stdout -a3 '?a?a?a?a' -s 5555 -l 20... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,261 |
08-21-2017, 07:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Distribute calculations and "verification" hashes
Post: RE: Distribute calculations and "verification" has...
| Are both tools possibly using different hcstat files? |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,261 |
08-22-2017, 03:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Distributed Computing for cracking a long passwd
Post: RE: Distributed Computing for cracking a long pass...
| oclhashcat-* won't crack anything with more than 15 chars. You probably did not specify --pw-min.
The part with the first four chars being fixed is a limitation of the cracking engine implementatio... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
46,753 |
07-09-2012, 09:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Distributed Computing for cracking a long passwd
Post: RE: Distributed Computing for cracking a long pass...
|
undeath Wrote: (07-09-2012, 09:44 PM)
--
oclhashcat-* won't crack anything with more than 15 chars.
--
epixoip Wrote: (07-09-2012, 04:44 AM)
--
oclhashcat cannot crack passwords > 16 chars.
--
a... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
46,753 |
07-11-2012, 11:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Distributed Computing for cracking a long passwd
Post: RE: Distributed Computing for cracking a long pass...
| pretty useless to define -1 ?d though. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
46,753 |
07-13-2012, 03:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Distributed Computing for cracking a long passwd
Post: RE: Distributed Computing for cracking a long pass...
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
46,753 |
07-25-2012, 07:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself
Post: RE: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself
| "keyspace" in itself seems to be a pretty well-defined word but does not match what hashcat considers "keyspace". Maybe this option should be renamed to something more fitting. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
15 |
20,288 |
11-24-2017, 10:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself
Post: RE: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself
|
royce Wrote: (11-25-2017, 10:38 PM)
--
Yeah, the naming cat is probably already out of the bag.
--
The old options could stay but be left undocumented in --help and a differently named switch with t... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
15 |
20,288 |
11-27-2017, 12:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
| Is there any sane reason to run hashcat on a non-64bit system? Other than failing to install the correct OS arch I mean. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,673 |
06-04-2016, 07:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Does anybody know...
Post: RE: Does anybody know...
|
KT819GM Wrote: (12-11-2012, 09:47 PM)
--
You can ask Jeremi more about these nodes :D
--
hell, that guy is hard to catch |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
5 |
10,896 |
12-11-2012, 10:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Does hashcat support ATI AMD RADEON 550 ?
Post: RE: Does hashcat support ATI AMD RADEON 550 ?
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
8,305 |
06-12-2012, 01:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Does Hashcat support custom hash mode?(Ex: md5(md4($pass).sha1($pass)))
Post: RE: Does Hashcat support custom hash mode?(Ex: md5...
| no
There was an error posting your reply: The message is too short. Please enter a message longer than 5 characters |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,171 |
08-31-2017, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Does it matter?
Post: RE: Does it matter?
| You'll waste a few attempts but besides that nothing. |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
1 |
3,638 |
01-21-2016, 06:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: does not see the second processor 48 cores/ see only 24 cores
Post: RE: does not see the second processor 48 cores/ se...
| Can you show the information hashcat prints at the start of the cracking process? Where it lists the OpenCL devices. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,347 |
10-07-2019, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: does not see the second processor 48 cores/ see only 24 cores
Post: RE: does not see the second processor 48 cores/ se...
| The part that lists all your detected devices |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,347 |
10-07-2019, 11:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: does not see the second processor 48 cores/ see only 24 cores
Post: RE: does not see the second processor 48 cores/ se...
| You took the correct screenshot. For some reason OpenCL doesn't detect your second CPU, which is some problem with the OpenCL runtime. I don't have any experience with multi-cpu setups and no idea wha... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,347 |
10-08-2019, 10:08 AM |
