|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Sorry but: TrueCrypt USB-Drive
Post: RE: Sorry but: TrueCrypt USB-Drive
| Not sure why you tried skip=1993276928. According to the FAQ you need the first 512 bytes of /dev/sdc1.
Is your password 0123456789 or 123456789? Are you using a hidden volume? |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,678 |
02-27-2018, 03:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Sorry but: TrueCrypt USB-Drive
Post: RE: Sorry but: TrueCrypt USB-Drive
| oh, I think I misread that for "first". Are you sure you are using the correct hash mode? I don't know what Truecrypt's default settings are. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,678 |
02-28-2018, 04:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Sort -u problem
Post: RE: Sort -u problem
| you forgot the leading slash. it should be "/media/" not "media/". "media/" would point to some directory like /your/current/working/path/media/...". Also make sure your external drive is not mounted ... |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
4 |
9,400 |
11-18-2011, 02:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Sorting utf-8 wordlists
Post: RE: Sorting utf-8 wordlists
| how does the sort command you run look like? |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
7 |
15,345 |
06-12-2012, 01:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Sorting utf-8 wordlists
Post: RE: Sorting utf-8 wordlists
| cannot confirm.
Code:
--
[ undeath@p4home: /tmp ] % ~> cat test
öasdf
Ä‘hg4sb5t56
Äwegver
Àsdrvgßsd
Ä‘hg4sb5t56
è weü46zgbe4z
[ undeath@p4home: /tmp ] % ~> sort -u... |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
7 |
15,345 |
06-12-2012, 01:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Special characters in salt
Post: RE: Special characters in salt
| maybe the password is too strong? |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
6 |
11,817 |
07-26-2012, 03:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Special characters in salt
Post: RE: Special characters in salt
| you probably did not save the hash file with the correct charset. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
6 |
11,817 |
07-26-2012, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Special mask attack rules?
Post: RE: Special mask attack rules?
| use https://www.thesprawl.org/projects/pack/ |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
2 |
2,216 |
09-20-2018, 07:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Spectre/Meltdown patch a prob?
Post: RE: Spectre/Meltdown patch a prob?
| For GPU cracking definitely not. For CPU cracking, very likely not. You mostly lose performance when doing IO, which hashcat avoids as much as possible. |
|
undeath |
General Talk
|
2 |
2,431 |
08-02-2018, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed comparison WPA/WPA2 (2500) vs WPA/WPA2 PMK (2501)
Post: RE: Speed comparison WPA/WPA2 (2500) vs WPA/WPA2 P...
| You are confusing PMK and PMKID. The hash mode for the PMKID attack is 16800. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
9 |
4,607 |
01-06-2020, 12:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed comparison WPA/WPA2 (2500) vs WPA/WPA2 PMK (2501)
Post: RE: Speed comparison WPA/WPA2 (2500) vs WPA/WPA2 P...
| It's used to attack a WPA handshake using pre-calculated PMK for a specific SSID. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
9 |
4,607 |
01-06-2020, 01:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed issue with WPA2
Post: RE: Speed issue with WPA2
| 1. do your masks have a static prefix? are you using rules with the wordlist?
2. 2501 WPA PMK, not WPA PSK. If you don't know what PMK means you don't need it.
3. estimated time is only for the mask... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,642 |
07-06-2018, 02:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed issue with WPA2
Post: RE: Speed issue with WPA2
| given your low-end hardware the numbers you see seem plausible. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,642 |
07-07-2018, 11:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed of crack for WPA/WPA2 hash
Post: RE: Speed of crack for WPA/WPA2 hash
| The wiki article you mention is about maskprocessor, not hashcat. If you use mp the candidates are generated on cpu.
Using hashcat's a3 mode is always better than using mp if you don't need any spe... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
21,164 |
09-02-2017, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed of crack for WPA/WPA2 hash
Post: RE: Speed of crack for WPA/WPA2 hash
| Yes, if you pipe anything into hashcat (mp/pp/…) it's using your cpu.
In general mask attack will be the fastest mode but with sufficient rules the speed of a wordlist attack should be pretty clo... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
8 |
21,164 |
09-03-2017, 05:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit
Post: RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit
| you missed oclhashcat-plus :) |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
10 |
49,692 |
11-03-2012, 11:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: speed reduce in using rules to generate keys
Post: RE: speed reduce in using rules to generate keys
| what do you mean by "very low speed"? how do you measure it? |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,323 |
03-16-2018, 11:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed running on 8800GT (beginner)
Post: RE: Speed running on 8800GT (beginner)
| everything's alright. WPA is very slow and your card is very old (and an nvidia one). |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,751 |
03-29-2012, 04:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speedcheck please
Post: RE: Speedcheck please
| here's the formular:
(((amount of ram in gb)*(cpu clock speed in GHz))/((hdd size in gb)*(hdd max read speed in mb/s)+(wordlist size in gb)))*ln(1) |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
12,655 |
10-24-2014, 11:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speedcheck please
Post: RE: Speedcheck please
|
Rolf Wrote: (10-24-2014, 12:25 PM)
--
Keyspace is different because the second example's output is for a different command (take a look at the mask).
--
not the mask but wrong usage. |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
12,655 |
10-24-2014, 02:01 PM |
