|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
| hashcat does not check for the empty string. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,496 |
05-21-2012, 09:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
|
Mangix Wrote: (05-22-2013, 02:44 PM)
--
Is it me or is a titan faster than a 7970 at Whirlpool based on those results? If so, why?
--
orks and golems are also damn fast! |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-22-2013, 11:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.12 kernel error
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.12 kernel error
| probably the old (newer) driver has not been properly removed. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
11,691 |
01-13-2013, 10:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hashcat.hcstat: No such file or directory". Is this wanted?
Hash type naming is in... |
|
undeath |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,312 |
06-28-2012, 07:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.08 notes
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.08 notes
| Either my monitor is broken or you get 99% GPU usage. Also you're complaining about not having a big speed increase after a version bump? lol.
Quote:
--
And I have scanned from 0 to 34 % with OCL ... |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
16,491 |
12-14-2011, 12:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite not working
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite not working
| in general you can stick to this rule: every mid-range/high-end desktop gamer card which is not too old is supported. (recommended AMD 5000 series or later) |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
10,382 |
01-30-2012, 03:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
|
kigg Wrote: (04-08-2012, 07:33 PM)
--
I think it is like this because the code isn't optimised for the new 28nm cards.
--
It is, and has always been, because Nvidia cards suck at GPGPU.
https://i... |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
23 |
70,083 |
04-08-2012, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite 0.09 linux x64 hd5970 50% GPU Usage
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite 0.09 linux x64 hd5970 50% GPU ...
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
12,066 |
10-17-2012, 09:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite / oclHashcat-plus: New Feature : True base64 parser
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite / oclHashcat-plus: New Feature...
| the average user will probably have no benefit from this feature, but i think it might be quite cool in some special cases. |
|
undeath |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,639 |
06-08-2012, 02:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat+ v0.12 does not see the second card
Post: RE: oclhashcat+ v0.12 does not see the second card
| old versions are not supported any more. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,895 |
04-23-2013, 04:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Looks like something is off to me. Check the outputs in the first post, atom. |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,898 |
04-29-2016, 05:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
halexan Wrote: (05-03-2016, 05:49 AM)
--
Is there any method to narrow the gap?
--
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 10:43 AM)
--
Basically 1) add a rule (important!) and 2) add -w 3
--
note: preferably a ru... |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,898 |
05-03-2016, 12:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.33
| I can confirm this problem:
cudaExample0.sh
cudaHashcat 1.31 @ 750Ti
Started: Thu Feb 26 17:39:51 2015
Stopped: Thu Feb 26 17:41:29 2015
>>> 98s
cudaHashcat 1.32b16 @ 750Ti
Started: Thu Feb 26 17:2... |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,907 |
02-26-2015, 06:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.20
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.20
|
donjuaan Wrote: (05-16-2014, 10:07 PM)
--
Radeon HD 4500/5100 Series graphics card.
--
no, not compatible. |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
44 |
160,918 |
05-16-2014, 10:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running with
Post: RE: oclHashcat running with
| Old versions are time bombed and will not work any more. |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,581 |
03-02-2015, 08:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat on desktop apu and decryt
Post: RE: oclHashcat on desktop apu and decryt
| what error are you getting and why do you use --force? |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,353 |
06-01-2015, 11:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat new features / algorithms
Post: RE: oclHashcat new features / algorithms
| Seeing the "No new algorithm, add true support for utf-16" option reminds me that true UTF-8 support would be great. Like UTF-8 aware rules, masks aso. |
|
undeath |
Organisation and Events
|
23 |
52,613 |
10-09-2014, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat Help Plz
Post: RE: oclHashcat Help Plz
| tl;dr
posting your hashes is forbidden |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
18,136 |
06-12-2014, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat FPGA support
Post: RE: oclHashcat FPGA support
| Looking at the performance of various FPGA boards a GPU is probably faster. With custom asics this might look different.
Please stop talking about "decryption" in the context of hashes. |
|
undeath |
Hardware
|
6 |
16,557 |
06-27-2016, 07:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
Post: RE: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
| the ntlm hash for your password is 8E066685EF3164FCC65DA14DFDF89535 |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,301 |
11-17-2015, 04:54 PM |
