|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Linux Shadow hashes
Post: RE: Linux Shadow hashes
|
elidell Wrote: (07-12-2017, 01:12 AM)
--
so the hash from the shadow file is as such:
root:$1$DhqYuxhs$p/O7aro1npF4yvkRT7qJK.:16786:0:99999:7:::
--
This is not the hash but the full user entry.
r... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
7 |
12,730 |
07-12-2017, 12:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [solved] How to remove numbers from dictionary .txt or .dic
Post: RE: How to remove numbers from dictionary .txt or ...
| msys/mingw is your friend |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
7 |
12,710 |
02-14-2013, 04:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to know which rules has been used to crack ?
Post: RE: How to know which rules has been used to crack...
| --debug-mode=1 (and additionally: --debug-file=used_rules.rule) |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
12,702 |
08-10-2011, 07:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to know which rules has been used to crack ?
Post: RE: How to know which rules has been used to crack...
| unfortunately only hashcat supports the debug-mode. |
|
undeath |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
12,702 |
08-11-2011, 04:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: new user needing assistance with cracking md5s
Post: RE: new user needing assistance with cracking md5s
| hashcat does not support having usernames supplied with the hashes. You need to crack the hashes and afterwards replacing the hash with the corresponding user using some script. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
6 |
12,670 |
12-03-2011, 01:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: new user needing assistance with cracking md5s
Post: RE: new user needing assistance with cracking md5s
| the hash list must only contain the hashes itself in hex-encoding. No additional characters. In your screenshot every hash is followed by a comma. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
6 |
12,670 |
12-03-2011, 12:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: new user needing assistance with cracking md5s
Post: RE: new user needing assistance with cracking md5s
| actually no fine tuning is necessary if you have a recent GPU (like the 6950). The speed is ok. If you plan to use multiple GPUs make sure not to enable crossfire. Also make sure your power supply is ... |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
6 |
12,670 |
12-03-2011, 10:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speedcheck please
Post: RE: Speedcheck please
|
Rolf Wrote: (10-24-2014, 12:25 PM)
--
Keyspace is different because the second example's output is for a different command (take a look at the mask).
--
not the mask but wrong usage. |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
12,656 |
10-24-2014, 02:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speedcheck please
Post: RE: Speedcheck please
| here's the formular:
(((amount of ram in gb)*(cpu clock speed in GHz))/((hdd size in gb)*(hdd max read speed in mb/s)+(wordlist size in gb)))*ln(1) |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
12,656 |
10-24-2014, 11:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-27-2019, 11:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| can you try with -w3?
Weirdly the loops are much lower for your actual run compared to the benchmark. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-28-2019, 10:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| try hashcat64.exe -m1000 -a3 d:\hashlists\Random\test.txt ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a -w3 -O |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-28-2019, 09:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Piping in words means every single word needs to be copied from your CPU to the GPU. That's slow! You can get away without speed penalties when using slow hash modes, but for fast hash modes that's ba... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-30-2019, 11:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| I'd guess the mask is still too short and doesn't provide enough work. Numbers are pretty close to the benchmark on all cards but the fastest, the 2080. |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-30-2019, 09:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
|
Quote:
--
It's acting like a basic dictionary lookup and ignores the rules parameter completely.
--
You're specifying the rules file for the first instance, rules are applied before they hit the seco... |
|
undeath |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,656 |
08-31-2019, 08:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Scrypt and TMTO question
Post: RE: Scrypt and TMTO question
| Do you even know what TMTO means? It has nothing to do with n, p, r values. (what is r?) |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
12,640 |
06-23-2015, 07:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Scrypt and TMTO question
Post: RE: Scrypt and TMTO question
|
mrleau Wrote: (06-24-2015, 03:04 AM)
--
Please correct me if I'm wrong but it's Time Memory TradeOff and from my limited understanding is used to control Execution time and/or memory usage of the sc... |
|
undeath |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
12,640 |
06-24-2015, 06:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
|
undeath |
General Help
|
9 |
12,636 |
02-20-2015, 11:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
| rules only work on single characters (well, actually bytes), not character sequences. Rules are not delimited by whitespace. Whitespace is just for making them look nicer. |
|
undeath |
General Help
|
9 |
12,636 |
02-23-2015, 04:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
Post: RE: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
| read the license agreement screen and you'll know what to do… you know… text is for reading. |
|
undeath |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
12,627 |
02-10-2015, 08:02 PM |
