|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat on GTX 480
Post: RE: oclHashcat on GTX 480
| update it to the latest stable version and it will work |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
27,640 |
10-04-2010, 01:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GUI for oclHashcat?
Post: RE: GUI for oclHashcat?
| you may want to ask hakre since he is the one who wrote the hashcat gui overlay :-) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,228 |
10-06-2010, 09:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ugh Help PLEASE!!! i cant get hashcat to work
Post: RE: Well i followed all the videos and this is wha...
| something really makes no sense on this. especially not using md5($pass.$salt) in combination with -e brute-vbulletin.salt
what exactly do you want to do? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
8,830 |
10-08-2010, 04:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 speed improvement ideas
Post: RE: MD5 speed improvement ideas
| man, this is nice. thanks for the explanation and thanks for placing this on our forum. you should come to our irc channel! i've added it to hashcat v0.35. here is how it changed: 9.17M/s -> 9.34M/s. ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
20 |
56,897 |
10-10-2010, 10:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: EGB v1.7
Post: RE: EGB v1.7
| thx for info. lets do some benchmark and update the comparisation page... :) |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
9,349 |
10-10-2010, 10:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: load/save from/to http-server
Post: RE: load/save from/to http-server
| nice idea but as long as you can do it with external commands there is no real need for it. also, from an architectonic view its somehow strange to add a http client to a password cracker. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
9,188 |
10-10-2010, 11:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 speed improvement ideas
Post: RE: MD5 speed improvement ideas
| this is something i already implemented long time ago. since it gives no performance improvement i removed it (i prefer to have a clean and easy to read source). i guess the compiler already optimized... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
20 |
56,897 |
10-11-2010, 12:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ATI and Nvidia - same system?
Post: RE: ATI and Nvidia - same system?
| you say its crashsing. is it really crashing? i mean theoretically it should catch the exception and give an appropriate error message. if this is not the case its a bug. just want to be sure about it... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
13 |
33,095 |
10-13-2010, 10:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 speed improvement ideas
Post: RE: MD5 speed improvement ideas
| dont get me wrong. this was very constructive stuff. i hoped more threads like this would pop in :-) thanks again for your improvement tips. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
20 |
56,897 |
10-13-2010, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Single hash use on command line
Post: RE: Single hash use on command line
| its not so hard to add this. but -h is already in use. i'll add it if i have some spare time. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,640 |
10-13-2010, 10:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ATI and Nvidia - same system?
Post: RE: ATI and Nvidia - same system?
| cat 10.9 and sdk v2.2 is perfect. but you may need to use latest beta, i will send you link in PM |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
13 |
33,095 |
10-13-2010, 10:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Implementing OclHashCat Distributed Problems
Post: RE: Implementing OclHashCat Distributed Problems
|
Quote:
--
1) Is there a way to define a custom char set of special characters.
ie) -1 '|?
I don't think there is,
--
sure you can exactly do it that way (and you may need to escape them ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
6,425 |
10-13-2010, 10:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 speed improvement ideas
Post: RE: MD5 speed improvement ideas
| again, this is awesome! i've added it to hashcat on complete round 3. speed changed from 9.34M/s -> 9.47M/s. i think i can port it to oclHashcat, too. more infos later. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
20 |
56,897 |
10-15-2010, 01:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 speed improvement ideas
Post: RE: MD5 speed improvement ideas
| works! changes on GTX465 with oclHashcat: 968.6M/s -> 983.8M/s |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
20 |
56,897 |
10-15-2010, 03:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 speed improvement ideas
Post: RE: MD5 speed improvement ideas
| added this to oclHashcat on ATI and NV. no speed improvements at all. i guess this was already optimized by compilers. hashcat supports pw length up to 55 chars and i think it should so that means tha... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
20 |
56,897 |
10-17-2010, 10:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat ATI Domain Cached Credentials
Post: RE: oclhashcat ATI Domain Cached Credentials
| i can reproduct this on ATI. NV is not affected. i have it already fixed in v0.24 beta version. i will send you link to beta in PM, pls verify that it is fixed. nice catch, thanks for reporting :-) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
19,909 |
10-18-2010, 03:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with -l and -s
Post: RE: Problem with -l and -s
| the parameter -l is currently not supported on oclhashcat. it requires a complicated rewrite of the scheduling engine. if you need distributed oclhashcat in wordlist-mode, you currently need to split ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
12,488 |
10-18-2010, 03:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
Post: RE: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
| gee, i remember there was such an issue in a very old oclhashcat version. i can not reproduce this on v0.23. neither on ATI nor on NV. make sure you have the latest version installed. oh and v0.24 is ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,948 |
10-26-2010, 09:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
| i dont know if there are any technical reasons for not adding zip or aes to gpgpu based cracking. i never looked into them. hc and oclhc are made for competition and these competitions usually base on... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
10-26-2010, 09:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
Post: RE: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
| for plain dictionary attack use cpu hashcat |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,948 |
10-27-2010, 07:14 AM |
