|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Slow performance on traditional des
Post: RE: Slow performance on traditional des
| Thats very good for the first card, but not for the 2nd. Looks like GPU bios clocked it down due to heat. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,849 |
10-07-2013, 12:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Which one (hashcat/oclhashcat-plus/lite) for which algorithm?
Post: RE: Which one (hashcat/oclhashcat-plus/lite) for w...
| The -s and -l flags will be gone after the fusion, but maybe come back sooner or later OR with an external tool to create fake .restore files that can do the same. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
14,790 |
10-09-2013, 09:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| If you think you found a bug, please post it on TRAC including all information how to reproduce. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-09-2013, 09:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| No, cudaHashcat* uses the driver API, which is completly different to the CUDA runtime |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
10-10-2013, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.15
| Ignore it, oclHashcat-lite will be merged into oclHashcat v1.00 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements
|
1 |
14,720 |
10-10-2013, 10:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| I usually do not like to talk about why is hashcat not open source, because people are very stubborn when it comes to this question. There are 1000 arguments for and against open source (or closed sou... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,494 |
10-12-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| Oh and btw, hashcat is not a fork of JtR. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,494 |
10-12-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
| remember that the .restore file is written only at specific times. it might not be an issue, you maybe stopped to early and it did not had a chance to write the file. especially when you increase the ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-15-2013, 04:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat-plus v0.15
| also note, rule-files are not supported in -a 1 mode. so actually that would be two feature requests. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
2 |
18,839 |
10-15-2013, 04:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat distributed WPA2
Post: RE: oclHashcat distributed WPA2
| oclHashcat-plus works different than oclHashcat-lite. There are two major difference in oclhashcat-plus that you do not have with oclHashcat-lite:
- oclHashcat-lite has a known keyspace when the pr... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
7,106 |
10-15-2013, 04:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can Oclhashcat Open Interface to developers?
Post: RE: Can Oclhashcat Open Interface to developers?
| I don't like that idea.
- There could be 3rd party developers that would start writing support for kernels but only for selling them. This could create a situation that people start thinking the "i... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,665 |
10-15-2013, 05:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)
Post: RE: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)
| lol, try -b --benchmark-mode 1
we may need to lower -n and/or -u for the slow algorithms, too |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
5,554 |
10-15-2013, 05:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5(unix) performance
Post: RE: MD5(unix) performance
|
mrfurious Wrote: (10-13-2013, 02:51 PM)
--
Is the unix version doing many iterations?
--
right, md5crypt is doing 1000 iterations of md5. but theres also some sort of obfuscation build into it, so ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,762 |
10-15-2013, 05:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: snucl
Post: RE: snucl
| I've splittet the thread.
Anyone ever tried that snucl thing? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,914 |
10-15-2013, 05:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: RIPv2
Post: RE: RIPv2
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,442 |
10-15-2013, 05:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| No it's as I said, the driver API is completly different to the CUDA runtime |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
10-15-2013, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite-0.15 crash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite-0.15 crash
| Are you using --benchmark-mode 1? This should create 99% utilization. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
15,377 |
10-15-2013, 05:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: snucl
Post: RE: snucl
| sure no problem, send me the company name as it is reported from clinfo and i will build a new beta |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,914 |
10-16-2013, 09:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
| remember that wpa kernels are very slow, and his system might be much slower than your 7970's :) Maybe for him takes it 1 hours to reach 2% while it's just 5 minutes for you |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-16-2013, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: RIPv2
Post: RE: RIPv2
| Thanks magnum!
In this case you can -not- use use hashcat to crack RIPv2. But it's easy to add.
@digininja: can you provide example hash and plain in their "natural" form? That is extracted wit... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,442 |
10-22-2013, 09:48 AM |
