|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| thats something it will do if it has --remove switch. till then, use hashcat cpu version to do it / see how it behaves |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-13-2011, 08:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
Post: RE: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
| maybe i should limit this to like 800 or so in next release |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
23,291 |
02-13-2011, 08:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
Post: RE: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
17,323 |
02-13-2011, 08:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [hashcat] MD5 frrom Linux
Post: RE: [hashcat] MD5 frrom Linux
| $2a$ is not supported, its blowfish not MD5 |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
7,375 |
02-13-2011, 12:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Not sure; Bug or Me??
Post: RE: Not sure; Bug or Me??
| nice catch, Tommie_c. its a bug and i have fixed it. if you are interessted in a fix beta PM me. fix log:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.36# cat word
Amistad
Athens
Atlanta
Beaumont
Berkeley
Buffalo... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
5,230 |
02-15-2011, 12:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MultiGPU Verify Usage on Windows
Post: RE: MultiGPU Verify Usage on Windows
| didnt you see this message?
NOTE: When experiencing preformance loss due to mixed GPU types try using the -d option.
mixed gpu types are no longer supported. well you can run multiple instances usin... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
12,382 |
02-15-2011, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-15-2011, 03:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's Linux
Post: RE: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's L...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
36,156 |
02-15-2011, 03:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's Linux
Post: RE: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's L...
| looks good, however if you want to compare performance with other cracker use sha1 since sha1 can not be reversed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
36,156 |
02-15-2011, 05:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's Linux
Post: RE: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's L...
| yes, you can ignore the warning. but no, it will not from 1-12. it search from
5-12 because your mask is ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1. read https://ob-security.info to get more information about --increm... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
36,156 |
02-15-2011, 06:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v0.36
Post: hashcat v0.36
| Download it here: https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
* changes v0.35 -> v0.36:
Code:
--
type: bug
file: hashcat-cli
desc: crashes if using -a 1 or -a 2 in combination with a single rule
cred: sho... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
2 |
15,497 |
02-15-2011, 06:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
Post: RE: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
| ok, i think i can get v0.26 to double the username size to 16 chars. that should be enough? however it will decrease performance a bit. but what do you mean with newline appended? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,750 |
02-16-2011, 10:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-16-2011, 10:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: fp recieved EOL?
Post: RE: ERROR: fp recieved EOL?
| this is something that should not happend and is a big problem. did you changed the wordlist while it was used in an attack? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,094 |
02-16-2011, 05:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
Post: RE: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
| i am not sure if i can make it for oclhc+. maybe in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,750 |
02-16-2011, 05:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| i am in an very experimental phase, here are some (theoretical) updates of the new warp-mode kernels:
mysql: 145 B/s -> 1x = 36.4 B/s
md5: 25 B/s -> 1x = 6.2 B/s
sha1: 11.3 B/s -> 1x = 2825 M/s
this... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-16-2011, 07:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| new version will rock massive in single hash cracking :) check out the forum often, i will release a public beta soon. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-18-2011, 06:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: fp recieved EOL?
Post: RE: ERROR: fp recieved EOL?
| no i can not. looks valid for me. can you reproduce it this way? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,094 |
02-18-2011, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: can the oclHashcat work in the SSH or 3389?
Post: RE: can the oclHashcat work in the SSH or 3389?
| ssh should work, rdp never tested. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,222 |
02-18-2011, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
Post: RE: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
| no, they are there for a reason. for example if i want to play games or watch movies on the same card while i am cracking i need to lower these number to make room for additional calculations by 3rd a... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
23,291 |
02-20-2011, 09:55 AM |
