|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: WPA/WPA2 dictionary attack doesn't work!
Post: RE: WPA/WPA2 dictionary attack doesn't work!
| Try wpaclean (it's in aircrack-ng) before creating the hccap. Or if you used wpaclean already, try creating the hccap without using wpaclean before. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,958 |
05-16-2016, 01:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need Help to find out hash type
Post: RE: Need Help to find out hash type
| You need the source to find about the algorithm used. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
7,713 |
05-16-2016, 01:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ASP.NET Membership Password Hash
Post: RE: ASP.NET Membership Password Hash
| There's just this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#what_is_the_maximum_supported_salt_length |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,366 |
05-16-2016, 01:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: about using old version
Post: RE: about using old version
| Just don't use old versions |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,418 |
05-16-2016, 01:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-3.00 beta syntax
Post: RE: hashcat-3.00 beta syntax
| It uses both, just choose a larger wordlist |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,034 |
05-19-2016, 08:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ASP.NET Membership Password Hash
Post: RE: ASP.NET Membership Password Hash
| No, we don't try it. There are better ways to handle large salts, as described on the wiki I linked |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,366 |
05-19-2016, 08:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Help with MSKerb5 Hash
Post: RE: Help with MSKerb5 Hash
| looks invalid, please see example hash page on the wiki |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
5,732 |
05-19-2016, 08:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Times of cracking single hashes
Post: RE: Times of cracking single hashes
| No, but you can write your own script to do it |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,740 |
05-19-2016, 08:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need Help to find out hash type
Post: RE: Need Help to find out hash type
| Could be anything. As I've said, you need to reverse the algorithm or look into the source. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
7,713 |
05-19-2016, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very low hashrate on two 770s
Post: RE: Very low hashrate on two 770s
| Sounds about right, its pbkdf2-hmac-sha512. What let's you think it should be faster, or what did you expect? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,675 |
05-19-2016, 08:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Got a GTX1080 but cudaHashcat does not work
Post: RE: Got a GTX1080 but cudaHashcat does not work
| You need to wait for the next release, which is soon.
In the meanwhile you can use the beta from hashcat.net/beta |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
2 |
4,507 |
05-28-2016, 05:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-40 benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-4...
| Those are propably wrong. You need to adjust power limit to 120% (afterburner or so) and rerun |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,534 |
05-28-2016, 06:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-40 benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-4...
| Really, wrong. It's always when Nvidia releases a new series, the first driver has a reduced power limit set. After 2-3 driver release cycles they will set it internall to 100% (which is ~120%) from c... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,534 |
05-28-2016, 06:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-40 benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-4...
| It's fast, but not as fast as expected. Theoretical calculations show different numbers. You don't need to overclock, just set the correct power limit. Please rerun with 120%. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,534 |
05-28-2016, 06:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat beta and ubuntu 16.04 summary
Post: RE: hashcat beta and ubuntu 16.04 summary
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
19,539 |
05-30-2016, 09:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Generating random strings
Post: RE: Generating random strings
| No, max. length 55 (and 32 for stdin, which you'd need here). |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
4,086 |
05-30-2016, 10:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat for bitlocker
Post: RE: hashcat for bitlocker
| We need more detailed information how bitlocker algorithms looks like, how hashes (or whatever we use here as alternative) are extracted and how we can verify the results. After that, we can add it to... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,794 |
05-30-2016, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Best approach for [capitalised word] [capitalised word] [1 to 99]
Post: RE: Best approach for [capitalised word] [capitali...
| Use combinator.bin from hashcat-utils to do the combinato part, pipe the results to hashcat using its stdin feature, add rules for the digits and the capitalize part |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,956 |
05-30-2016, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-40 benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-4...
| ^ check those, it's what you wanted to see :) |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,534 |
05-31-2016, 12:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-40 benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-4...
|
KT819GM Wrote: (05-31-2016, 09:47 PM)
--
Atom, can you explain in short, why cards like HD6990 so shitty in (descrypt, DES(Unix), Traditional DES) comparing to this card?
--
I'd need to rewrite it ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,534 |
06-01-2016, 11:05 AM |
