Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
|
|
Thread: caching segment, please wait ...
Post: RE: caching segment, please wait ...
Please switch to hashcat 3.00 beta, hashcat 2.xx (even if still in release mode) no longer supported. Things change soon. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,509 |
06-01-2016, 11:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1080 Founder's Edition Build
Post: RE: GTX 1080 Founder's Edition Build
Not sure what you're expecting from us |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
10 |
16,367 |
06-01-2016, 11:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 and UTF8
Post: RE: SHA1 and UTF8
https://www.rurapenthe.me/2013/09/cracking-hashes-with-other-language.html |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
18,352 |
06-01-2016, 11:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat for bitlocker
Post: RE: hashcat for bitlocker
Sorry, not enough information |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,794 |
06-01-2016, 11:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: extrem slow cracking
Post: RE: extrem slow cracking
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,206 |
06-03-2016, 10:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: How build it from source? [Windows7]
Post: RE: How build it from source? [Windows7]
cuda is deprecated, hashcat 3.00 uses opencl for nvidia gpu |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
6,333 |
06-03-2016, 05:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: Question regarding benchmark output
Post: RE: Question regarding benchmark output
In this case both, since md5crypt has exactly 1000 iterations. However what you see is the -u setting |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,058 |
06-03-2016, 10:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 and UTF8
Post: RE: SHA1 and UTF8
While thinking a bit on it, I think that's also the way to go if we would add real multibyte support into hashcat. Otherwise you'd end up in too many branches. We also need to keep the same length for... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
18,352 |
06-03-2016, 10:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
I'm talking about the binary distribution inside the .7z archives. I'm wondering if we can drop those binaries for 32 bit. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-04-2016, 12:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
royce Wrote: (06-04-2016, 02:50 PM)
--
Suggestion: Separate them out into their own .7z archives.
That way, you can track whether anyone is downloading them. If no one is using them, you can drop... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
undeath Wrote: (06-04-2016, 07:23 PM)
--
Is there any sane reason to run hashcat on a non-64bit system? Other than failing to install the correct OS arch I mean.
--
There's some algorithm that can ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
There's also the problem that there's no nvml.dll for 32 bit on Windows. That makes hardware management on NVidia a bit problematic, but users could misinterpret it and falsly assume hardware manageme... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hardware Review Please
Post: RE: Hardware Review Please
|
atom |
Hardware
|
13 |
15,138 |
06-06-2016, 11:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Question regarding benchmark output
Post: RE: Question regarding benchmark output
No, it's only for slow hashes |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,058 |
06-06-2016, 11:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hardware Review Please
Post: RE: Hardware Review Please
I don't know, the whole configuration looks wrong for me, but I'm not that much of a hardware specialist.
CPU, RAM and Board is OK. Power is good but you may need to think about how you manage 2 of ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
13 |
15,138 |
06-07-2016, 09:05 AM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1080 FE Temperature & Power Requirements
Post: RE: GTX 1080 FE Temperature & Power Requirements
Just as a reference, here's results of my 2x1080 system:
Code:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# ./hashcat /root/single -a 3 -w 3 --powertune-enable ?b?b?b?b?b?b?b -m 900
hashcat (v3.00-beta-146-g106e781) ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
20 |
27,830 |
06-07-2016, 09:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Integrated AMD GPU with oclHashcat
Post: RE: Integrated AMD GPU with oclHashcat
AMD's APU and other accelerators like Intel PHI or FPGA should work as well |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
13,401 |
06-07-2016, 12:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: v3.0 : *.dic: No such file or directory
Post: RE: v3.0 : *.dic: No such file or directory
I've put up a new beta (62). Please try again with that one. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,768 |
06-07-2016, 12:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: v3.00 beta 63 SHA1 error
Post: RE: v3.00 beta 63 SHA1 error
It's a feature, not a bug. We only test the last 128 bit for correctness. Or said an other way, you will never find two password sharing the same last 128 bit therefore it's correct to do so. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,134 |
06-09-2016, 05:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 and UTF8
Post: RE: SHA1 and UTF8
That's correct, both points. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
18,352 |
06-09-2016, 05:42 PM |