|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
| i forgot about the joomla effect. you are right, they have 32 bytes. i will bring it back in next version. but yeah, it will require an additional if () so the performance will drop a little bit. its ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
02-20-2011, 09:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: can the oclHashcat work in the SSH or 3389?
Post: RE: can the oclHashcat work in the SSH or 3389?
| thanks sono, thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,222 |
02-20-2011, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| there is no such 12 character limit. you can already use a 8 + 4 mask (8 on the left, 4 on the right). 0.26 will include BFI_INT, otherwise these numbers wouldnt be possible :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-20-2011, 10:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's Linux
Post: RE: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's L...
| that is absolutly correct. the brute-force idea was ok in the past where hashes were ciphers and therefore limited somehow. for example DES which is limited to 8 chars or its children like LM which is... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
36,156 |
02-20-2011, 10:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: question mark in special charset
Post: RE: question mark in special charset
| currently you can not specify the question mark because there is no escape character in parsing routine :-) v0.26 will have hex charset support... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
9,528 |
02-21-2011, 12:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26b
Post: oclHashcat v0.26b
| Hello hashcat community,
as some of you guys already know, i started to play around with the BFI_INT instruction (required me to hack the binary kernels of oclHashcat). It was much fun when it work... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
15 |
43,756 |
02-21-2011, 03:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Im need help for crack this whit new version v0.26
Post: RE: Im need help for crack this whit new version v...
| salted algos not supported in v0.26 beta |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,088 |
02-21-2011, 06:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26b
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26b
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
15 |
43,756 |
02-21-2011, 06:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: why use 2x HD5970 sametime just one work?
Post: RE: why use 2x HD5970 sametime just one work?
| fix your driver installation to get 2nd hd5970 working. do not enable crossfire. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,762 |
02-22-2011, 03:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
02-22-2011, 03:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ bug?
Post: RE: oclhc+ bug?
| can you try with md5 instead of dcc? dcc had problems in oclhc, too |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,261 |
02-23-2011, 09:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: maskprocessor --increment
Post: RE: maskprocessor --increment
| crunch is a mask processor? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
13 |
30,795 |
02-24-2011, 06:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ bug?
Post: RE: oclhc+ bug?
| everything is fine! not a bug. both oclhc and oclhc+ just can not crack hashes with plain of length >= 16 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,261 |
02-25-2011, 12:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: maskprocessor --increment
Post: RE: maskprocessor --increment
| cool, did not know that. is it also that fast as mp? for example, if i do:
root@sf:~/maskprocessor-0.64# time ./mp64.bin ?l?l?l?l?l?l -o /dev/null
real 0m2.838s
user 0m2.720s
sys 0m0.110s... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
13 |
30,795 |
02-25-2011, 12:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
| that was a good hint mastercracker. i found somthing. it is exactly as i said in the beginning. it is salted with a null-byte. or better said its the unicode version of something. take the first examp... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-26-2011, 09:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NooB question oclhashcat+
Post: RE: NooB question oclhashcat+
| p = 0 means you just have no passes cracked |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
6,311 |
03-02-2011, 11:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to
Post: RE: How to
| md5crypt is slow but at least you know how the pass is generated. i recomment you to use maskprocessor and pipe it into oclhc+ (one of oclhc+ feature is reading from stdin):
./mp64.bin -1 ?u?d ?1?1?1... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
24,166 |
03-05-2011, 10:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Distributed oclhashcat version
Post: RE: Distributed oclhashcat version
| this is already possible. see blandys successfull approach to get the idea behind: https://www.md5decrypter.co.uk/projects.aspx |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
20,744 |
03-08-2011, 06:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to convert an IgHashGpu command line in olchashcat
Post: RE: How to convert an IgHashGpu command line in ol...
| sl3 cracking not yet supported |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
11 |
28,403 |
03-08-2011, 11:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to convert an IgHashGpu command line in olchashcat
Post: RE: How to convert an IgHashGpu command line in ol...
| no, it is limited to 15 chars (for optimization reasons) but sl3 requires 24 chars |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
11 |
28,403 |
03-09-2011, 10:37 AM |
