|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: des key collision?
Post: RE: des key collision?
| Do you mean having 2 different keys that produce the same CT out of the same PT? Sure, that's possible: https://twitter.com/hashcat/status/775345537210019841 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,486 |
02-10-2017, 02:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
| The thing is if you would have any experience in programming you wouldn't have said so. A function will not make it faster, it will make no difference at all. The compiler will recognize a fixed numbe... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-10-2017, 03:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
abdou99 Wrote: (02-10-2017, 02:29 PM)
--
If you are saying that both values: 0 and 1 are crackable
so what's the news?
value = 0 ==> 50% Crackable
value = 1 ==> 100% Crackable
is that what are ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-10-2017, 03:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: des key collision?
Post: RE: des key collision?
| Yeah right, it's 3DES, but the same would occur to DES, just with less "collisions". I just used that example because it was the only one I had. I was able to increase the speed of the BF because I co... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,486 |
02-10-2017, 05:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: des key collision?
Post: RE: des key collision?
| Yes, you need to go through all of it, and that's your problem because you can't search a 2^112 bit keyspace no matter how fast the kernel is |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,486 |
02-10-2017, 07:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: Please vote
| I can increase rule-based attack speed but for the price of a decreased brute-force attack speed.
I can not guarantee the numbers, but after the change all modes will have the same speed.
The speed... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-10-2017, 07:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
| I think it's mostly copy / paste of the -m 14000 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
12,932 |
02-10-2017, 07:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: RE: Please vote
| For those haven't seen it: There's a voting system on top of this thread |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-10-2017, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: RE: Please vote
| OK, poll is closed now. Bad thing is that I've found in the meanwhile that the idea didn't work out, so everything will stay as-is :) |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-11-2017, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
| This is another episode of the great AMD OpenCL runtime! I've just tested it locally with my NV GTX1080 and AMD RX480 with the same hashcat version (v3.30-157):
NV:
Quote:
--
$RAR3$*0*b14426c0cf7c9... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-13-2017, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
| It's not hard to understand if you know OpenCL in detail, Crypto schemes like PBKDF2 and how to optimize it as an attacker, HMAC and how to optimize it as an attacker, SHA1 and how to optimize it as a... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-13-2017, 11:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Truecrypt Issues
Post: RE: Truecrypt Issues
| If this is not a boot device it makes not sense to attack it with 624x, so why should you. It will just increase the time. For the other three modes 6213, 6223 and 6233: Just run them in a sequence |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,793 |
02-13-2017, 11:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
| I've found a workaround using a volatile variable, but I can't say how much it dropped the performance because the value before was wrong because of that OpenCL runtime error. Anyway, it should work o... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-13-2017, 12:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-13-2017, 12:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCrypt hashes?
Post: RE: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCry...
| Not a bug, your wordlist is too small (198172 candidates), there's simply no restore checkpoint possible with it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,891 |
02-13-2017, 02:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCrypt hashes?
Post: RE: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCry...
| That's because you did check only 348 words yet (28780880 / 82563). You threads alone do 256, not even counted the shader or the -n multiplicator. For sure you didn't reach a checkpoint for restore. P... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,891 |
02-13-2017, 11:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: help me
Post: RE: help me
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,079 |
02-13-2017, 11:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
| 59xx series is dead, even AMD dropped it from the drivers. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,943 |
02-13-2017, 11:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| You can use the 3rd (optional) parameter of cap2hccapx to select a specific ESSID only. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-15-2017, 09:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
Post: RE: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
| Rewrite it to get rid of the includes and we will think about it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
6,346 |
02-15-2017, 09:02 PM |
