|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Winblows: System wont see 3rd GPU? Any advice?
Post: RE: Winblows: System wont see 3rd GPU? Any advice?
| i never used more than 2 nvidia card on a windows machines so i cant say anything about it. from my experience with amd it was neccessary to "active" the card and sometimes it was neccessary to connec... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
4 |
11,498 |
11-01-2011, 10:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Cpu + gpu for wpa/wpa2 how to set ?
Post: RE: Cpu + gpu for wpa/wpa2 how to set ?
| you can not pause in stdin mode since all input comes from STDIN, not from keyboard. so there is no input device that oclHashcat-plus could accept and input from user left.
what you can do is to calc... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
21 |
58,355 |
11-01-2011, 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GPU speed sudden reduction
Post: RE: GPU speed sudden reduction
| yeah, installation catalyst and SDK on linux is crazy. check if your distribution itself adds a catalyst package. maybe its enought just to remove it and then the cat 11.4 is used by the system. somet... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
16,851 |
11-01-2011, 10:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: q6600 Cluster
Post: RE: q6600 Cluster
| what you can do is to run 5 instances of oclHashcat*. you just have to split the workload into 5 chunks. see this article to get an idea: https://hashcat.net/wiki/distributing_workload_in_oclhashcat |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
12,822 |
11-01-2011, 10:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - use all handshakes
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - use all handshakes
| wait, oclHashcat-plus does not handle the handshakes inside the .cap file. it just cracks them. thats why you have to convert them before.
to your question: i am not very experienced with aircrack-ng... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
12,417 |
11-01-2011, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ssh and oclHc+
Post: RE: ssh and oclHc+
| sounds like you are on linux. in this case make sure the user which is logged in into ssh has a valid xsession. this means, exactly the same user must be logged in to X11. thanks to amd for this "feat... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,744 |
11-01-2011, 04:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,185 |
11-01-2011, 06:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - use all handshakes
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - use all handshakes
| i had the same thoughts when writing the wpa kernels. so i talked to aircrack-ng developer misterx and he said you should use the "wpaclean" utility before converting the .cap to .hccap. this wpaclean... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
12,417 |
11-01-2011, 06:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Catalyst 11.10
Post: AMD Catalyst 11.10
| Hey Guys,
I just wanted to let you know that I have tested the latest official Catalyst 11.10 on oclHashcat*.
I will make it short: No change at all. Neither on Window nor on Linux.
The 100% CPU ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
7,414 |
11-02-2011, 01:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: cudaHashcat-plus64.exe error
Post: RE: cudaHashcat-plus64.exe error
| mixed GPU types are problematic. try adding -d 1 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
44,378 |
11-02-2011, 03:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SimpleHash class support?
Post: RE: SimpleHash class support?
| if there is more interesst in this i will think about it. any popular project known using this hash? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
7,616 |
11-03-2011, 12:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi-WPA cracking
Post: RE: Multi-WPA cracking
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,079 |
11-04-2011, 06:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: < 8 Character WPA Passwords
Post: RE: < 8 Character WPA Passwords
| Since the rule engine processes the word before the rejection filter in case of WPA, the word got passed. The word "Monkey123" is greater than length 8. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
14,938 |
11-04-2011, 10:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MaskProcessor From File
Post: RE: MaskProcessor From File
| makes no sense. the reason to have large rule files is to keep gpu busy. |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
7 |
18,801 |
11-05-2011, 05:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Toggle Rule
Post: RE: Toggle Rule
| T is the function, means "toggle-case". This function requires exactly one single parameter.
T0: 0 is the parameter = change case of position 0
T1: 1 is the parameter = change case of position 1
T9:... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
16 |
36,132 |
11-05-2011, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: < 8 Character WPA Passwords
Post: RE: < 8 Character WPA Passwords
| maybe because it is not 8 - 16. its 8 - 15. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
14,938 |
11-05-2011, 05:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Toggle Rule
Post: RE: Toggle Rule
| Yes, but that is EXACTLY the optimization in it and what makes the toggle case that efficient. if you have upper case chars in your password you do it to make it harder to crack the pass. that also me... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
16 |
36,132 |
11-05-2011, 05:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MaskProcessor From File
Post: RE: MaskProcessor From File
| i know what you mean. but if you do it like this, all password condidates run through the STDIN stream. no mutation on GPU = low gpu utilization = slow speed.
|
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
7 |
18,801 |
11-05-2011, 05:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Toggle Rule
Post: RE: Toggle Rule
| if you want to do real toggle-case attack you can use hashcat in --stdout mode. you would not need rules then. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
16 |
36,132 |
11-05-2011, 05:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Toggle Rule
Post: RE: Toggle Rule
| there is no reason to implement it in oclHashcat-plus since there is no improvement (neither in speed nor in flexibility) in comparisation to piped attack. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
16 |
36,132 |
11-05-2011, 11:32 PM |
