|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Domain Cached Credentials
Post: RE: Domain Cached Credentials
| ok i have a beta ready. next version v0.20 will have domain cached credentials (DCC) support |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
18,226 |
06-04-2010, 09:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What linux distro do you recommend?
Post: RE: What linux distro do you recommend?
| not sure if the distribution make a diffrence. ubuntu 9.x has been tested a lot and it works fine on there. more important is that the cpus support sse2 :)
$ grep sse2 /proc/cpuinfo |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,360 |
06-04-2010, 01:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: mysql5
Post: RE: mysql5
| ok i have a beta ready. next version v0.20 will have MySQL4.1/MySQL5 support :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
9,933 |
06-04-2010, 08:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and memory
Post: RE: oclHashcat and memory
| next version v0.20 will have wordlist segmentation. this allows wordlists to be of arbitrary size. limited memory will no longer be an issue. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
7 |
22,894 |
06-01-2010, 11:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
Post: RE: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
| as you said, hashcat is very fast in doing dictionary attack. even on my biggest wordlists that are greater than 1gb it is finished in less than a minute. why adding dictionary attack on oclHashcat? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,356 |
06-01-2010, 09:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Per position charset support
Post: RE: Per position charset support
| i am not sure if i understood you 100% correctly. but if i do, then you are lucky. it is already implemented in.
using the mask you described, you need to run oclhashcat 6 times
oclHashcat.exe examp... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
11,975 |
05-30-2010, 02:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What are rules?
Post: RE: What are rules?
|
elimist Wrote:
--
What are rules?
--
they are used to manipulate words from your dictionary a bit like changing the original case, appending numbers and so on...
elimist Wrote:
--
does my word ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
9,003 |
05-30-2010, 09:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA-256
Post: RE: SHA-256
| thanks. what speed do you expect? i mean, which gpu cracker are you currently using to crack sha-256? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
9,914 |
05-29-2010, 07:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Post: RE: Driver/SDK version message
| this is an ATI related problem and comes up due the combination of two single problems. first, to get the full performance out of ATI it requires vectorizing. this means it is best crunching 4 passwor... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,060 |
05-29-2010, 07:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat cracking special chars error
Post: RE: hashcat cracking special chars error
| it reads 40 chars of the line to be the hash, yes, regardless of the position of the seperator. the reason therefore is the problematic hash:salt format. it is possible that the seperator char itself ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,100 |
05-29-2010, 06:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueReadBuffer() -5
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueReadBuffer() -5
| hey, thats a new one. which ubuntu version are you using and which nvidia driver? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,709 |
05-27-2010, 08:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat cracking special chars error
Post: RE: hashcat cracking special chars error
| no. hashcat is complaining about an -unmatched seperator-
this mean either your hash is not exactly 40 bytes or on pos 40 + 1 is not the expected seperator char or you have wrong -m mode.
but, if i... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,100 |
05-27-2010, 05:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat cracking special chars error
Post: RE: hashcat cracking special chars error
| hashcat format is hash:salt, not salt:hash |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,100 |
05-27-2010, 04:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
| iirc, the character ^ is (was?) the escape character on windows shell. so it is possible to create problems. not really sure about.
at least on my win7 box it does not crash, it worked as expected. b... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,041 |
05-27-2010, 09:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
Post: RE: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command lin...
| k9 is correct. but i admit, 0.00M/s can confuse a bit. so i planned to change speed-display in the next release v0.20 a bit. speed display will be more user-friendly so that it dynamically recalculate... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
30,398 |
05-27-2010, 09:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: mysql5
Post: RE: mysql5
| oclHashcat will support MySQL4.1/MySQL5 in a later version. in the meanwhile you can use hashcat v0.34. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
9,933 |
05-27-2010, 09:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| please try it exactly this way:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -n 80 --gpu-loops 1024 -m 0 -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1
if this does not work, same problem was reported and solved here: https://hashcat.ne... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,798 |
05-25-2010, 02:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
| its working perfectly..
if you have 180M/s in single-hash and you load 340k salts then the expected speed-drop is 180.000.000 / 340.000 = 529 words/sec. thats why it shows you 0M/s but actually its... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,025 |
05-25-2010, 02:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
Post: RE: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
| for best results, please use one of the following commands (like spoq did):
NVIDIA:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash --gpu-loops 1024 -m 0 -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1
ATI:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -n 80... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
41 |
128,066 |
05-25-2010, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
| oclHashcat does not cache 1st md5($pass) which is why it can handle more than 500 salts. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,025 |
05-25-2010, 01:10 PM |
