Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
|
|
Thread: Mask attack issues
Post: RE: Mask attack issues
If we both can't reproduce the issue, the chances that there's no issue is higher than it is user error |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,836 |
02-16-2017, 09:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1080: errors
Post: RE: GTX 1080: errors
Drop the Mesa driver, it's known to break. But it also seems your OpenCL ICD is somehow bugged. I'd recommend to not use The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali), the OpenCL integrati... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
13,777 |
02-16-2017, 07:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask attack issues
Post: RE: Mask attack issues
Should have cracked 8 length passwords. I tried locally and it worked fine |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,836 |
02-16-2017, 07:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
OK, the 15.201.1151.1008 is an older driver version. Unfortionally we can't stick to an older driver version because we need to support new GPU and they need drivers.. :) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,943 |
02-16-2017, 07:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: match column
Post: RE: match column
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_can_i_show_previously_cracked_passwords_and_output_them_in_a_specific_format_eg_emailpassword |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,138 |
02-16-2017, 07:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: Algorithm based bruteforce
Post: RE: Algorithm based bruteforce
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,683 |
02-16-2017, 01:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: md5(md5($salt).md5($pass).$salt)
Post: RE: md5(md5($salt).md5($pass).$salt)
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,368 |
02-16-2017, 01:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1080: errors
Post: RE: GTX 1080: errors
The "Device #1: Graphics Device" is kind of strange. Maybe your GPU does not support this driver. Try again with latest driver version from nvidia site (378.x series). |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
13,777 |
02-16-2017, 01:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
Yeah, I understood that. It's very likely wpaclean will break you cap (as aircrack-ng -J does) so there's no easy way to filter it. That's why I said that cap2hccapx supports filtering. He just need t... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-15-2017, 09:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCrypt hashes?
Post: RE: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCry...
As I said already not if you use a single hash. Since bcrypt is salted, there's not benefit (from a time perspective) then to run them all in a single mode in a sequence. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,891 |
02-15-2017, 09:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
Post: RE: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
Rewrite it to get rid of the includes and we will think about it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
6,346 |
02-15-2017, 09:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
You can use the 3rd (optional) parameter of cap2hccapx to select a specific ESSID only. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-15-2017, 09:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
59xx series is dead, even AMD dropped it from the drivers. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,943 |
02-13-2017, 11:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: help me
Post: RE: help me
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,078 |
02-13-2017, 11:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCrypt hashes?
Post: RE: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCry...
That's because you did check only 348 words yet (28780880 / 82563). You threads alone do 256, not even counted the shader or the -n multiplicator. For sure you didn't reach a checkpoint for restore. P... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,891 |
02-13-2017, 11:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCrypt hashes?
Post: RE: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCry...
Not a bug, your wordlist is too small (198172 candidates), there's simply no restore checkpoint possible with it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,891 |
02-13-2017, 02:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-13-2017, 12:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
I've found a workaround using a volatile variable, but I can't say how much it dropped the performance because the value before was wrong because of that OpenCL runtime error. Anyway, it should work o... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-13-2017, 12:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Truecrypt Issues
Post: RE: Truecrypt Issues
If this is not a boot device it makes not sense to attack it with 624x, so why should you. It will just increase the time. For the other three modes 6213, 6223 and 6233: Just run them in a sequence |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,793 |
02-13-2017, 11:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
It's not hard to understand if you know OpenCL in detail, Crypto schemes like PBKDF2 and how to optimize it as an attacker, HMAC and how to optimize it as an attacker, SHA1 and how to optimize it as a... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-13-2017, 11:31 AM |