|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| That could explain it. Can you completely uninstall in one of the windows 7 machines the drivers. Also make sure the OpenCL.dll is removed (I think it will be not uninstalled). Then remove it by hand,... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
Post: RE: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
| Cool, thanks for reporting back |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,943 |
06-30-2016, 05:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
Post: RE: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
| Both errors go back to some broken OpenCL installation |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,943 |
06-30-2016, 12:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
|
winxp5421 Wrote: (06-30-2016, 11:59 AM)
--
i have 5 machines total 3 are windows 10 and 2 are windows 7.
windows 10 machine one (nvidia) no issues
windows 10 machine two (amd) catalyst 15.12 missin... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 12:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| Good because I tested the CPU version of Intel myself and it worked. However I did not test the GPU version. So that means both AMD and Intel (at least the GPU part) have a different JIT than NVidia f... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
|
l30n Wrote: (06-30-2016, 09:51 AM)
--
Well, I don't have AMD
Quote:
--
OpenCL Platform #1: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
- Device #1: Intel(R) Core(... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 09:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| Maybe a general AMD + windows problem? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 09:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00 + ntlm performance
Post: RE: hashcat v3.00 + ntlm performance
| It was always that fast (in oclHashcat), I just didn't backport the optimizations to hashcat-legacy. If you want to know more about the partial reversal used read this: https://hashcat.net/events/p13/... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,354 |
06-30-2016, 09:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| Look like AMDs OpenCL runtime (on windows only) silently ignores the -I parameter. It's configured correctly, as you can see in the debug output:
Quote:
--
-I "C:/Users/tv/Desktop/HTPHashcat3/ha... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 09:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00 + bcrypt
Post: RE: hashcat v3.00 + bcrypt
| It's unknown yet, happend after the move from CUDA to OpenCL. I will look into it when I have some time |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,334 |
06-30-2016, 09:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00 + The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali)
Post: RE: hashcat v3.00 + The-Distribution-Which-Does-No...
| Try with --gpu-temp-disable if this does any change |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,451 |
06-30-2016, 08:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00 + older nvidia
Post: RE: hashcat v3.00 + older nvidia
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
7,432 |
06-30-2016, 08:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00 error
Post: RE: hashcat v3.00 error
| Please try again and add --gpu-temp-disable |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,694 |
06-30-2016, 08:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What means "1024/4096 MB allocatable"
Post: RE: What means "1024/4096 MB allocatable"
| OpenCL has a bit a strange policy on memory allocation:
Quote:
--
Max size of memory object allocation in bytes. The minimum value is max (1/4th of CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE, 128*1024*1024)
--... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
4,416 |
06-30-2016, 08:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00 + older nvidia
Post: RE: hashcat v3.00
|
rico Wrote: (06-29-2016, 11:02 PM)
--
> Note that with older NVidia GPUs, and by old I mean before maxwell chipsets, there is a drop in performance.
You weren't kidding, WPA hashrate down 43% on m... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
7,432 |
06-29-2016, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel CPU OpenCL with Radeon?
Post: RE: Intel CPU OpenCL with Radeon?
|
dTest Wrote: (06-29-2016, 11:10 PM)
--
I'm just a bit OCD about error messages :P )
--
Haha, welcome to the club, me too. To get rid of it, you just need to set an environment variable:
CPU_MA... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
15,339 |
06-29-2016, 11:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00
Post: hashcat v3.00
| [hr]
hashcat v3.00 release notes
[hr]
There are a multitude of changes with this release; I'll try to describe them all at the level of detail they deserve.
You can download here: https://hash... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
129,162 |
06-29-2016, 05:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
Post: RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
|
unixm Wrote: (06-29-2016, 12:38 PM)
--
Is there a possibility that using values other than what's specified as recommended for WPA2 for example 16 /16 would cause it to skip the correct value or is i... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
7,409 |
06-29-2016, 03:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
Post: RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
| The direct use of -n and -u will no longer be supported with hashcat v3.00 which will automatically tune them for you. You will be able to select a configuration based on the following profiles:
... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
7,409 |
06-29-2016, 12:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Crimson 16.6.1 only 32bit oclhashcat working
Post: RE: AMD Crimson 16.6.1 only 32bit oclhashcat worki...
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
8,959 |
06-29-2016, 11:59 AM |
