|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat using CUDA over OPENCL, why?
Post: RE: Hashcat using CUDA over OPENCL, why?
| You can also use --backend-ignore-cuda |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
411 |
09-30-2020, 02:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-30-2020, 01:44 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (09-30-2020, 12:16 PM)
--
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:14 PM)
--
If this is not a correct place to report some issues/make suggestions... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-30-2020, 02:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat using CUDA over OPENCL, why?
Post: RE: Hashcat using CUDA over OPENCL, why?
| Yes, a simple -d 2 in your case will do the trick. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
411 |
09-30-2020, 02:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
KillerCube Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:51 PM)
--
I think this new attack method is awesome and I would also like to be able to use something like
Code:
--
mypass,passtest,passguess:
--
Of course using... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-30-2020, 12:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:14 PM)
--
If this is not a correct place to report some issues/make suggestions then please let me know and I'll shut up :D
I noticed that this mode doesn't real... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-30-2020, 12:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
Peanutbutter1 Wrote: (09-29-2020, 05:20 PM)
--
This is awesome. Is there any interest in a variation of this attack that, instead of using rules on each individual hash's associated hint, you can pro... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-30-2020, 12:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
royce Wrote: (09-29-2020, 05:03 PM)
--
Wow, this is going to be a game-changer!
If feasible, one UX request: Please do what JtR does here and warn the user about any "calculatable" efficiency thresh... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-30-2020, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: how to limit a character in the mask
Post: RE: how to limit a character in the mask
| You need to generate a maskfile using PACK (you can find it on github). |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
184 |
09-30-2020, 10:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
| Kernel Developer:
There's two changes you typically need to apply to your kernel.
1. Replace "salt_pos" with "SALT_POS"
2. Replace "digests_offset" with "DIGESTS_OFFSET"
That's it. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-29-2020, 04:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
| With commit 04d5e5a119ba4c44bedb5bcccd5a42f82463cca3 I have added a new attack-mode called "Association Attack" (a different name could be "Context Attack"), but let's stick to "Association Attack" fo... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-29-2020, 03:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v6.1.0
Post: RE: hashcat v6.1.0
| I have updated to hashcat 6.1.1 because of a small bug in hashcat.log and, more important, because of a too new GLIBC requirement in the binary package. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
4,016 |
07-29-2020, 12:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v6.1.0
Post: hashcat v6.1.0
| [hr]
Welcome to hashcat v6.1.0!
Download binaries and source code from: https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
[hr]
This release is mostly about expanding support for new algorithms and fixing bugs:... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
4,016 |
07-28-2020, 12:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: RE: Rules in 16800 don't work?
| instead of using:
Code:
--
hashcat -a 0 -m 16800 test.hash word.dict -r test.rule
--
you can also use:
Code:
--
hashcat -a 0 -m 16800 test.hash word.dict -r test.rule -S
--
|
|
atom |
General Talk
|
8 |
1,340 |
06-30-2020, 10:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 6.0.0
Post: hashcat 6.0.0
| [hr]
Welcome to hashcat v6.0.0!
Download binaries and source code from: https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
[hr]
It has been a long time since the last release, and a long journey for hashcat 6.0... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
21 |
87,682 |
06-16-2020, 05:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Using DD to get the hash of a non-system partition encrypted by VeraCrypt
Post: RE: Using DD to get the hash of a non-system parti...
| You're right the information on the wiki is not fully correct. Use bs=512 count=4097 (not a typo) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
861 |
03-29-2020, 02:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New plugin developer guide
Post: RE: New plugin developer guide
| Thanks for the feedback. Note that this documents is meant as a reference guide, not a tutorial. It would be great to have a quick tutorial, too. If you need any support in writing it, hashcat develop... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
1,717 |
03-28-2020, 07:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: DES ECB password search
Post: RE: DES ECB password search
| It's a valid collision. both hashcat1 and harhbat1 are valid keys which will do exactly the same encryption/decryption of every input you give. you can verify with openssl. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
4 |
1,227 |
03-19-2020, 08:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 5.1 incorrect сalculates benchmark
Post: RE: Hashcat 5.1 incorrect сalculates benchmark
| How about the results in benchmark mode? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
1,018 |
03-18-2020, 08:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: DES ECB password search
Post: RE: DES ECB password search
| With clear byte array, do you mean zero bytes? If yes you can use -m 14000 and set the salt to 0000000000000000 |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
4 |
1,227 |
03-18-2020, 08:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: bitlocker Hash-types Mask Attack Unable to crack the password correctly
Post: RE: bitlocker Hash-types 掩码?l?l?l无法正确�...
| There is not enough information provided to reproduce the problem. We need the hashes for the volume. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
2,309 |
03-11-2020, 10:15 AM |
