Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Using multiple dictionaries [noob question..]
Post: RE: Using multiple dictionaries [noob question..]
Also -a6 and -a7 mode will support this with v0.15. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
13,907 |
08-12-2013, 03:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: One 7970 running slower than other??
Post: RE: One 7970 running slower than other??
In this case its your wordlist which is to small. Try a bigger one like rockyou.txt |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
21,046 |
08-14-2013, 11:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat
Post: RE: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat
Yes, WPA is A LOT slower than raw MD5 :)
See benchmark tables to get an idea: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/#performance |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,935 |
08-14-2013, 11:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slower than version 0.08
Post: RE: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slow...
For WPA, especially use -u 4096 - should be faster than 0.08 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,044 |
08-18-2013, 12:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible minor bug in OclHashcat-Plus
Post: RE: Possible minor bug in OclHashcat-Plus
ADL_Overdrive5_Temperature_Get(): -1 is also often seen due to old GPU bios |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,001 |
08-19-2013, 03:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slower than version 0.08
Post: RE: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slow...
Yes, if you change performance settings you have to redo all work. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,044 |
08-24-2013, 09:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
Don't post errors if you use --force |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,654 |
08-28-2013, 12:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: multi rules debugging
Post: RE: multi rules debugging
no, multi rules are combining rules, not running them in a sequence. therefore, mastercrackers suggestion is correct. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
10,370 |
08-28-2013, 12:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: [fingerprint] combinator attack v0.13 bad, v0.15 good FYI upgrade!
Post: RE: [fingerprint] combinator attack v0.13 bad, v0....
Quote:
--
One last note about performance. There was a change to the status-display of the speed value which does not affect the real performance. With new oclHashcat-plus v0.15 the speed that is s... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,274 |
08-28-2013, 12:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
Right but the kernel was generated and cached and is now reused. Remove old *.kernel files in kernels/4098/ to make sure no old version using --force is used. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,654 |
08-28-2013, 12:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690)
Post: RE: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plu...
AMD has both more raw power and a the better integer instruction set (floating-point doesn't matter) and thus it's better for crypto, since crypto only uses integer instructions. That's the reason why... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,586 |
08-29-2013, 09:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Radeon HD 7470m -- oclHashcat-plus64.exe has stopped working
Post: RE: Radeon HD 7470m -- oclHashcat-plus64.exe has s...
Guess you have a problem now, since you installed the SDK. Remove the SDK and the driver with AMD buildin tools, then the most important step, remove it again using driver fusion soft (free version is... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
19 |
29,833 |
08-29-2013, 09:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Yes, you just need to copy the first 512 byte. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,766 |
08-29-2013, 09:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: --seq-max in hashcat plus?
Post: RE: --seq-max in hashcat plus?
-q will not be possible inside any hashcat version, it takes to much of a special algorithm. But yes, you can feed oclHashcat-plus (I guess you're talking about oclHashcat-plus not hashcat since you p... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,969 |
08-29-2013, 09:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: --seq-max in hashcat plus?
Post: RE: --seq-max in hashcat plus?
You might want to add --status and --status-timer=1 to see what it's doing |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,969 |
08-29-2013, 09:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: Radeon HD 7470m -- oclHashcat-plus64.exe has stopped working
Post: RE: Radeon HD 7470m -- oclHashcat-plus64.exe has s...
ERROR: clBuildProgram() -11 is it still that error or did it change? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
19 |
29,833 |
08-29-2013, 11:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Radeon HD 7470m -- oclHashcat-plus64.exe has stopped working
Post: RE: Radeon HD 7470m -- oclHashcat-plus64.exe has s...
hmm well its hard to say. never say someone with hd7470m before, maybe its just a driver issue and will self-fix with the next stable driver |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
19 |
29,833 |
08-29-2013, 03:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Syntax for Truecrypt-Boot-Mode
Post: RE: Syntax for Truecrypt-Boot-Mode
As for the images, you just need the first 512 byte from block device (or harddisk image). See https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes
You need -m 6241. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,713 |
09-03-2013, 02:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
Post: RE: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
Yes, it's true, it's slower, but not 50%. From my tests single hash MD5 with rule based attacks drop is around 25%
Make sure to read the release notes. You need to prepare your dictionaries |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
17,912 |
09-03-2013, 07:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: Can I use v0.14 for DES's key?
Post: RE: Can I use v0.14 for DES's key?
Raw DES is not supported. If you want it added, please create a ticket on TRAC and add some examples. Why v0.14? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,041 |
09-04-2013, 07:41 AM |