|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| OK, there was a huge bug on nvidia. All nvidia users reset to zero and download b92 and try again :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,310 |
06-27-2012, 12:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
Post: RE: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
| I can not reproduce it :( I even used a 32 bit version:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.09# ./oclHashcat-plus32.bin --hash-type 2500 --rules-file Diminishing_Password.rule test.hccap passlist... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
11,346 |
06-26-2012, 11:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| RC version (without beta-tag) is in /beta |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,310 |
06-28-2012, 12:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| GUYS check it out, its in /beta.
Tomorrow is release. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,310 |
06-28-2012, 04:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
|
undeath Wrote: (06-28-2012, 07:54 PM)
--
it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hashcat.hcstat: No such file or directory".... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,310 |
06-28-2012, 09:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
|
atom Wrote: (06-28-2012, 09:36 PM)
--
undeath Wrote: (06-28-2012, 07:54 PM)
--
it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hash... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,310 |
06-28-2012, 09:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| I have only good experience with 12.6 and tbh i recommend it to people. the advantage over 12.4 is that it does not have these ugly ASIC hangs. from performance perspective there is no difference. but... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,193 |
06-29-2012, 10:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| I just updated to 12.6 (final, not beta) on all my linux and windows machines. I can not reproduce this. Any specific command-line I can run? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,193 |
06-30-2012, 08:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| yeah crossfire always caused problems in the past. if you can, remove the crossfire bridge and try again. its worth trying it |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,193 |
07-01-2012, 09:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
| Yeah, oclHashcat-plus 0.09 requires more RAM because of SHA512. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,481 |
07-03-2012, 09:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
| Wait, thats a feature! :)
I dont want to have two parameters where one defines a single-hash and onle defines a hash-file.
I prefer to have that automatically checked. That means oclHashcat checks i... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-04-2012, 10:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,724 |
07-04-2012, 10:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
| that might be correct for md5 but there are so many other hashes that allow all chars like the base64 ones. so that would require a special parser for each hash type. a lot of work... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-05-2012, 12:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
| it would be easier to build hash-type specific memory segments than to load chunks, but that is something with not so high priority yet on my todo list |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,481 |
07-07-2012, 04:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| Guys, I am working on this :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,120 |
07-09-2012, 09:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Beta 0.09 missing?
Post: RE: Beta 0.09 missing?
| Yeah, very big changes and ways to unstable now. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
3,839 |
07-09-2012, 09:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
| OK, I can do that. Thank you. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-09-2012, 09:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Beta available
Post: New Beta available
| Hey Guys,
added latest beta Versions on the Server:
hashcat (Thanks to Xanadrel!):
desc: added -m 1420: sha256($salt.$pass)
desc: added -m 1410: sha256($pass.$salt)
desc: added -m 1720: sha... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,498 |
07-30-2012, 10:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| now thats a nice report mastercracker. i need to reproduce some of them while others i know are already known:
Quote:
--
- Status bar at the bottom not always appearing (really intermittent).
... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-05-2012, 08:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
| did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,280 |
08-06-2012, 02:08 PM |
