|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
|
mastercracker Wrote: (08-07-2012, 04:48 AM)
--
For the test-plus.pl, some of the perl modules are a pain to install when you don't know how to do it properly (I learned the hard way what is the easy ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-09-2012, 11:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
|
mastercracker Wrote: (08-06-2012, 07:42 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (08-06-2012, 02:08 PM)
--
did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested?
--
No. Are we supposed to do that? I ju... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,280 |
08-09-2012, 11:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
| There is a new BETA version up, please retry everything. I did several changes. The BUG with the PROMPT still exists, I will fix this later |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,280 |
08-09-2012, 11:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| wonderful report. will work on it |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| reproduced:
Quote:
--
- For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working.
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass)... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 11:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working.
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 2 does not work on bruteforce.
- For -m 110 sha1($pass.$salt), Br... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 12:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
Prompt is not shown sometimes
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 12:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Left:
Quote:
--
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
- For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack works (-a 0) but all the othe... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 12:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
--
Left:
Quote:
--
- For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack work... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 12:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack works (-a 0) but all the other attack mode fails.
- For -m 1710 sha512($pass.$salt), dictionary worked f... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 01:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| I have uploaded a new beta b43, please retry everything (not just the stuff that was marked as buggy) because of bugfixes new errors can appear somewhere. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-10-2012, 01:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.09b44 known bugs left
Post: 0.09b44 known bugs left
| overall:
-m 11 broken
-m 141 broken
-m 1800 broken (amd tested, nv not yet) on pw length 1 and 3
multihash (singlehash worked!), tested in -a 0
-m 1400 broken (amd tested, nv not yet)
-m 1410 broke... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,796 |
08-10-2012, 10:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.09b44 known bugs left
Post: RE: 0.09b44 known bugs left
| fixed in b45 (not yet uploaded)
Quote:
--
-m 1400 broken (amd tested, nv not yet)
-m 1410 broken (amd tested, nv not yet)
-m 1420 broken (amd tested, nv not yet)
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,796 |
08-10-2012, 10:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| ok i will close this thread, lets continue on the v44 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,149 |
08-12-2012, 06:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: Now for NVidia
|
Quote:
--
I am not sure what the definition of "broken" is but for sure, 1400, 1410, 1420, 2600, 2611 are not broken in my setup. My only concern is my forceware that is not recent. I will do the t... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-12-2012, 06:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,280 |
08-12-2012, 06:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.09b44 known bugs left
Post: RE: 0.09b44 known bugs left
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,796 |
08-12-2012, 06:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| mastercracker, are you testing on single hash or multihash? its two different kernels |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-12-2012, 06:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| fixed (on amd)
Quote:
--
- For -m 0 MD5, bruteforce of length 2, 4 and 8 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 2,4,8 and 12 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 100... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-12-2012, 07:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| i will remove the fixed issues from the original post, so its easier for me to track them |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-12-2012, 07:44 PM |
