|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| I am thinking about dropping support for permutation-attack from oclHashcat-plus. It will still stay in hashcat CPU and in hashcat-utils as well as stand-alone binary.
Thoughts? Who uses it? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,335 |
08-13-2012, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
Post: RE: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,283 |
08-13-2012, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| Fixed @ AMD:
Quote:
--
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), bruteforce on length 2 and 4 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 130 sha1(unicode($pass).$salt), bruteforce on length 2 and 4 fails... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-13-2012, 10:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| sorry?
toggle rules and permutation attack have nothing in common |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,335 |
08-13-2012, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| yeah i agree.. other thoughts? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,335 |
08-13-2012, 10:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| it costs me a lot of time developing the kernels. 25% of these are because of permutation attack. program architecture will be smaller and the diskspace reduces because we dont need the _a4 kernel any... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,335 |
08-13-2012, 12:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| OK, if no one explicitly cares about this feature I think we can remove it. It will still stay in the repository if we need it back. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,335 |
08-14-2012, 09:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| fixed:
Quote:
--
-m 11 broken
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-14-2012, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-14-2012, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: HD5750 on v45
|
mastercracker Wrote: (08-14-2012, 06:20 PM)
--
I did not do all algos on v47 as it takes a lot of time but I can confirm that everything works for -m 11 on my HD5750. Was there anything else changed... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-14-2012, 11:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| when you find some time, please redo all tests with v47, i am a bit confused now whats all fixed and whats still left.
at least two things i know that are not working:
- -m 1800 sometimes does not w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-14-2012, 11:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
|
Quote:
--
As a final note, I don't know what the exact problem was with -m 11 and what was the fix but in the real world, there are also Joomla with 16 characters salt. Ideally to crack those we w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,468 |
08-15-2012, 03:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
| Thanks mastercracker!
Quote:
--
-m 2711 only dictionary (-a 0) attack works.
-m 2811 only dictionary (-a 0) attack works.
--
This is interessting. The same happens on AMD, so maye there is a shar... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,355 |
08-17-2012, 11:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| Thanks mastercracker!
I have removed the bugs that have been fixed by cat 12.8 in your original post.
Also notice it might be neccessary to compile the kernels again with cat 12.8 but currently this... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,644 |
08-17-2012, 11:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| v48 is up but this is only compiled with catalyst 12.8. there should be no changes to the stated bugs. there is no need to test again before i fixed them. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,644 |
08-17-2012, 11:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
| v48 is up but this is only compiled with cuda 5.0. there should be no changes to the stated bugs. there is no need to test again before i fixed them.
cuda 5.0 however produces massive performance inc... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,355 |
08-17-2012, 11:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| I tried to reproduce this one:
Quote:
--
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 12 fails. Everything else works.
--
But it was cracked fine. Please verify |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,644 |
08-19-2012, 04:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 12 fails. Everything else works.
--
New version is up, other bugs still exist. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,644 |
08-20-2012, 01:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| fixed:
Quote:
--
-m 141 Nothing works
--
New version is up, pls test |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,644 |
08-21-2012, 11:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
| fixed:
Quote:
--
-m 141 Nothing works
--
New version is up, pls test |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,355 |
08-21-2012, 11:53 AM |
