|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: legacy hashcat question
Post: RE: legacy hashcat question
| There's no true generic kernel. There's always a limit. In theory, you could have a 25gb long bytestream as salt. That would propably exceed your GPU ram. But even such a thing could be supported, but... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,589 |
07-20-2016, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
Post: RE: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
| Try without --username, it takes alot of extra memory. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,674 |
07-20-2016, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat v3?
Post: RE: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat...
|
Quote:
--
In other words, for now, I need to split the provided rules\d3ad0ne.rule into GPU and CPU rules to have all of them run?
--
Yes, that's a pretty good idea.
Quote:
--
Is it planned to ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
23,766 |
07-20-2016, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HC3 not working, vs HC2
Post: RE: HC3 not working, vs HC2
| Do this and it will work:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,994 |
07-21-2016, 09:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
Post: RE: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
| Sure, you need to remove the username first. Use "cut" to do that. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,674 |
07-21-2016, 09:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| This is a nice hack, thanks |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
07-21-2016, 09:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| I've added this hack to the current upstream and created a beta: https://hashcat.net/beta/
Can you please try it out? Make sure to _not_ have set the TMP variable when you try the new beta |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
07-21-2016, 10:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: crack rar
Post: RE: crack rar
| Yes, RAR3 with header encryption and RAR5 is supported. RAR3 without header encryption is not supported. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
10,704 |
07-21-2016, 10:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mask prepend string performance
Post: RE: Mask prepend string performance
| It's not a bug, it's how it's designed. Depending on the hash-type, which you didn't specify, you can workaround this easily. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,525 |
07-21-2016, 10:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mask Attack -> Approaching Final Keyspace
Post: RE: Mask Attack -> Approaching Final Keyspace
| This is pebkac!
Such a keyspace is done in no time: 10 * (4 ^ 12) = 167,772,160 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
14,441 |
07-21-2016, 10:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HC3 not working, vs HC2
Post: RE: HC3 not working, vs HC2
| No, the opposite. OpenCL is faster, but requires a more modern GPU. That is Shader Model 5.0 or higher. See here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B1S_t1Z0KsqByH3pNkYUM-RCFMu860nlfSsYEqOoqco/ed... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,994 |
07-21-2016, 10:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mask prepend string performance
Post: RE: Mask prepend string performance
| If it's MD5, just append the known substring as a salt. That means, have a hash file in this format:
hash:pass
And then use -m 20 to crack it with the mask ?l?l?l?l?l?l
That should give you a... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,525 |
07-22-2016, 10:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Warnings in hashcat v3 not present in cudaHashcat v2.01 - should I care?
Post: RE: Warnings in hashcat v3 not present in cudaHash...
| You propably just haven't disabled the acl for X11, which is required to have fan control if you run hashcat via ssh. See the part with Xsetup here: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=linux_server_h... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
15 |
20,489 |
07-22-2016, 10:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Combinator Attack with Stacked Rules
Post: RE: Combinator Attack with Stacked Rules
| You can't do -a 1 with -r in combination. What I meant is more like this:
$ ./combinator.bin words.dict words.dict | ./hashcat -m 0 -a 0 -r rules.rule
This way you can't specify which rule to ap... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,682 |
07-22-2016, 10:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mask prepend string performance
Post: RE: Mask prepend string performance
| No, that's related to a cryptographic flaw in MD5. But you can exploit it only efficient in a salt-appending situation. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,525 |
07-22-2016, 12:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error running on linux box
Post: RE: Error running on linux box
| read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
8,259 |
07-22-2016, 12:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error running on linux box
Post: RE: Error running on linux box
| New version support both GPU and CPU |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
8,259 |
07-22-2016, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error running on linux box
Post: RE: Error running on linux box
| You just need to get OpenCL working, then hashcat will work, too. The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) may be broken with OpenCL |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
8,259 |
07-22-2016, 02:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error running on linux box
Post: RE: Error running on linux box
| Yes, hashcat can work with CPU only. There's no GPU required. However you might have difficulties to get the AMD driver running without an AMD GPU.
pocl is another alternative. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
8,259 |
07-22-2016, 04:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
07-24-2016, 03:10 PM |
