Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: How it is possible to decrypt vb?
Post: RE: How it is possible to decrypt vb?
DutchKlee Wrote: (09-22-2016, 04:16 PM)
--
rico Wrote: (09-21-2016, 09:46 PM)
--
So now try again with 200GB of lists + rules this time.
--
Tryed it with the dive rule...but is it normal that it w... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
8,308 |
09-27-2016, 03:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: invalid source
Post: RE: invalid source
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,378 |
09-27-2016, 03:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Core dumped or Im doing something wrong?
Post: RE: Core dumped or Im doing something wrong?
Since clinfo is not part of hashcat but crashing too I'd say your OpenCL installation is broken. You need to fix that first. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,828 |
09-28-2016, 02:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Problem with Hashcat and mscash2
Post: RE: Problem with Hashcat and mscash2
Why 10241? If you use 10241 it will not work. Both JtR and hashcat use the $DCC2$ format. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
8,806 |
09-28-2016, 02:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Seeking help with slow hashing speeds
Post: RE: Seeking help with slow hashing speeds
The 170 kH/s sounds about right for WPA with a GTX970. Not sure where you got the 10.5 MH/s from, but not from WPA. To test it, run: hashcat32.exe -b -m 2500
And of course it takes longer if you us... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,621 |
10-01-2016, 08:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01
Post: RE: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01
Toi reduce deskopt lags and power consumption. If you want 2.01 speed, use -w 3 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,213 |
10-02-2016, 05:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01
Post: RE: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01
Just noticed, the 560Ti is pre-maxwell card. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,213 |
10-03-2016, 03:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD R7 240 --> hashcat?
Post: RE: AMD R7 240 --> hashcat?
The GPU is too old, it's not supported, trash it. To make use of the CPU, install an OpenCL runtime for it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
9,290 |
10-03-2016, 03:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat (v3.10) starting in benchmark-mode..Assertion `driver->ctx' failed. Aborted
Post: RE: hashcat (v3.10) starting in benchmark-mode..As...
Try with Intel OpenCL runtime for CPU, not beignet. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,355 |
10-04-2016, 02:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat-gui, windows 8.1, GTX660OC, two GTX570 card issues.
Post: RE: Hashcat-gui, windows 8.1, GTX660OC, two GTX570...
|
atom |
hashcat
|
14 |
15,999 |
10-05-2016, 12:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: Question About NTLM
Post: RE: Question About NTLM
It's exactly as you said.
Code:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# echo -n password | iconv -f utf8 -t utf16le | openssl dgst -md4
(stdin)= 8846f7eaee8fb117ad06bdd830b7586c
--
|
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
9,266 |
10-05-2016, 12:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: Implementing new algorithm questions
Post: RE: Implementing new algorithm questions
> pws[gid].i[0]
No, "i" is an array of u32 values. As most hashes are processed as 32 bit integers (not 8 bit chars) it faster this way. You just have to make sure to handle the endianess of the al... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,267 |
10-06-2016, 05:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: Implementing new algorithm questions
Post: RE: Implementing new algorithm questions
> If my results say the digest is 100% recovered but status is "Exhausted" instead of "Cracked"
It should automatically do that. If not you do not have all the loaded hashes cracked. Maybe you mark... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,267 |
10-06-2016, 05:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Question About NTLM
Post: RE: Question About NTLM
The NTLM kernel does that automatically for you |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
9,266 |
10-06-2016, 05:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: Implementing new algorithm questions
Post: RE: Implementing new algorithm questions
I'm closing this to avoid confusion. Discussion was continued here: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/524 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,267 |
10-07-2016, 02:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: Question About NTLM
Post: RE: Question About NTLM
Maybe this makes it more clear:
Code:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# echo -n password | iconv -f utf8 -t utf16le | xxd
00000000: 7000 6100 7300 7300 7700 6f00 7200 6400 p.a.s.s.w.o.r.d.
root@ht:... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
9,266 |
10-07-2016, 02:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: Can't get hashcat 3.x to use my Radeon 5970
Post: RE: Can't get hashcat 3.x to use my Radeon 5970
Please update your GPU to a more modern one. AMD dropped support for 5xxx and 6xxx series long time ago. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,761 |
10-07-2016, 02:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Figuring out salt from SHA1
Post: RE: Figuring out salt from SHA1
Wait, if you have a salted hash, that salt is a always known because it can't be a secret. Otherwise you simply exported it wrong. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,942 |
10-07-2016, 02:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: a very essential basic question!
Post: RE: a very essential basic question!
If you have a password hash you must have it from some kind of database. That database has the username linked to the hash. It's just not important for hashcat to know. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,846 |
10-07-2016, 02:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat - Can't find OpenCL ICD loader library
Post: RE: Hashcat - Can't find OpenCL ICD loader library
That's strange. It looks for a file named "libOpenCL.so". Can you make sure that file does not exist on your system? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
39,012 |
10-08-2016, 11:40 AM |